Skip to main content

Log Cabin
Log Cabin Republicans are positive their party will come around on civil rights sometime in the 21st century.
Message to Log Cabin Republicans: It ain't the party of Lincoln anymore.

A platform subcommittee proved that fact once again Tuesday by adopting planks that Tony Perkins of the hate group known as the Family Research Council took credit for.

In a more explicitly anti-gay stance than in previous years, the 2012 GOP platform reiterates support for a “constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman” as well as “campaigns underway in several other states to” amend their constitutions to define marriage as purely a heterosexual union. The platform also specifically criticizes President Barack Obama's decision to stop defending in court the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act that bars federal agencies from recognizing the legal marriages of gay and lesbian couples. A number of amendments, including one in support of civil unions for both straight and gay partners, were rejected.

It's hard to believe that gay Republicans and their supporters expected anything different given the overall tone of the party these days. Nonetheless, while stating the truism that platforms don't actually have a great impact on policy, Log Cabin Executive Director R. Clarke Cooper said in a press release:

"Tony Perkins may be boasting today about having written an antigay marriage plank into the Republican Party platform, but it will be a hollow and short-lived victory. The obsessive exclusion of gay couples, including military families, from the rights and responsibilities of marriage, combined with bizarre rhetoric about ‘hate campaigns’ and ‘the homosexual rights agenda’ are clear signs of desperation among social conservatives who know that public opinion is rapidly turning in favor of equality.

Unfortunately, what voters can’t see in this document is the significant debate within the Committee. We were pleased to see vigorous debate on amendments in support of civil unions and to delete language regarding DOMA. While these measures failed, the future direction of our party clearly trends toward inclusion."

Well, sure. Just as in the greater population, generational demographics within the GOP are bending toward support for marriage equality and other civil rights issues affecting the LGBT community. Translation: Stubborn anti-gay Republicans will eventually die and the majority of the party's youth will cast off the prejudices of the past. And choose to back freedom. Eventually.

But the current trend has yet to reverse itself in the GOP. It shouldn't be forgotten that demographic trends don't mean that every person under 35 accepts marriage equality and full civil rights for gays, lesbians and transgender persons. In the overall U.S. population, Gallup says that about two-thirds do. But that one-third who don't are undoubtedly heavily represented in Republican ranks. Every generation has its retrogrades. While younger Republicans are no doubt more likely to support gay civil rights than older ones, as proved this year by the efforts on the platform subcommittee by Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry, there is no evidence that the party's "eventually" is just around the corner.

Cooper's view that 2012 may well mark the last time the party's platform will kowtow to the Family Research Council would make Pollyanna blush. As long as the folks who equate opposition to civil unions with opposition to drug abuse and polygamy keep getting the applause and the planks, the party will remain in the dark ages.

Eventually, in a decade or two or three, the leaders of the Republican Party (instead of outlying dissidents within the party) will come to favor marriage equality. In the meantime, people who support it as well as the full platter of civil rights for every American, including LGBTs, already have a party to vote for.

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Aug 22, 2012 at 12:52 PM PDT.

Also republished by Milk Men And Women, Angry Gays, LGBT Kos Community, Kossacks for Marriage Equality, and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site