Skip to main content

In recent years the United States has witnessed an atmosphere in constant flux on the topic of climate change. Political alliances have formed and disintegrated, legislation has passed and failed and productive discussions have devolved into heated controversy and partisan gridlock. Little consensus on an appropriate response has emerged on Capitol Hill or in political venues across the country.

Meanwhile, climate change in rural America is more real than ever - especially in western forest communities. The effects are visible in drought, invasive species, abnormal wildfire, and extreme weather events. The Center for American Progress reports that during the four decades of the 1960s through the 1990s, the annual acreage burned by wildfire in the U.S. averaged 2,879,054 acres. Between 2000 and 2009 this average rose to 6,941,952 acres burning annually, and nearly 7 million acres have already burned in 2012. From Mexico to Canada, roughly 150 million acres of trees have been killed by pine beetle. These forest health risks, coupled with a nation-wide drought that has devastated over half of all counties in the U.S., are disturbing new trends.

These changes threaten the very foundation of natural resource-based communities that depend on the land for their well-being. But the concerns are not exclusive to rural America. Forests, rivers, and farms provide invaluable services like clean air, water, food, and fiber on which both rural and urban areas depend. Failure to respond to this dilemma will have grave repercussions for us all. However, proposed climate change solutions have often failed to recognize the important role rural communities play in adaptation and mitigation strategies. They have also rarely analyzed the potential economic benefits rural communities could accrue if given a lead role in responding to the issue. Much of this stems from misperceptions about rural America’s ability or reluctance to recognize and respond to climate change. As a result, recent attempts to address the issue have stalled due to a failure to unite rural voices in support of responsive policies.

Rural America has a key role to play in this process, and rural voices must be included in our national discussion if we are to make headway. Sustainable Northwest’s recent publication, “The Cowboy, The Outlaw, and The Kid”, is a series of stories profiling individual and community actions in response to climate change in rural America. These snapshots portray rural leaders in a light that unfortunately few have seen: as creators of innovative and feasible strategies to respond to the changes occurring in the landscapes and communities around them. They include:

•    A private landowner in southwest Oregon has converted a former timber company plantation into a working forest for carbon markets. He’s restored the forest, and the amount of carbon sequestered will offset 242,000 miles of car travel per year for the next 20 years.

•    15 years ago, four of the five sawmills in Lake County, Oregon had closed and local communities were on the verge of collapse. Instead of giving up, the county rallied to create a new natural resource economy by attempting to become the nation’s first county to offset all of its fossil fuel emissions with renewable energy.

•    A young woman in Trinity County, California has developed a climate change adaptation plan for her county and teamed up with the local timber industry, environmental groups, government partners and community members to implement it. They are working to move beyond the bitter divide of the timber wars, and build a new culture and economy based on conservation and sustainable land stewardship.

These rural leaders defy the stigma that is often attributed to rural America with regard to climate change, and momentum is building in other venues as well. For instance, the Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition (RVCC), convened by Sustainable Northwest, is comprised of western rural and local, regional, and national organizations that have joined together to promote balanced conservation-based approaches to the ecological and economic problems facing the West. As long-time participants in the RVCC, the individuals profiled in these stories prove that rural citizens are dedicated to taking up the toughest challenges.

We recognize that climate change is often a casualty of the political process. But these stories aren’t about red vs. blue. They focus on what is certain and simple: Real people, places, and communities joining together and rising up to do something about the real transformations they see in the real world around them. Where others have reacted out of fear and frustration, they choose to frame climate change as the art of the possible; an opportunity where others have voiced only opposition.

But rural communities can’t do this alone. Nearly 30% of U.S. territory is Federal land (rising to 50% in Western states), and we need Congress and land management agencies to respond to climate change by funding and supporting investments in conservation and adaptation planning. Agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Interior are working to identify how climate change will affect our nation’s forests and rangelands and respond to very different future conditions. One of the best things the U.S. Department of Interior and Bureau of Land Management can do right now is develop a climate change adaptation plan that will inform land management decisions, and work with rural communities to make it a reality. We know that rural Americans are rising to the challenge, and we encourage our Federal partners to do the same.

Our collective response to climate change will require unprecedented collaboration, ingenuity, and patience; but solutions stand before us, and it’s time to broaden the conversation. It must be held between communities, businesses, government, interest groups, and youth across the country willing to take leadership on the defining issue of our time. Regardless of background, geography, livelihood, or political preference, climate change is an issue that connects us unlike any other.

Rural people are the first responders to the impacts of climate change. They are those most intimately connected to the land we all depend on, and hold the collective knowledge to steward the resources that sustain us. Rural Americans like those in these stories should be recognized and supported for the invaluable work they perform, and will continue to carry out in years to come.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thank you for this. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    samanthab, salmo

    Rural America often gets left out and behind so I'm glad to see you bringing this to the forefront.

    I've been on the road a bit this summer in the Midwest and have been buoyed to see hundreds upon hundreds of wind turbines, sometimes as far as the eye could see, as I drove along the highways.

    Iowa, about a rural a state as there is, got 18.8% of its electricity in 2011 from wind power and is one of the leaders in the manufacture of wind turbines. Jobs! Good jobs! Indiana is also powering up wind farms and is in the top 10 states for wind power generation. I think that as farmers who have been devastated by the politics of Big Ag start to realize that they can profit by installing wind turbines, they will start seeing other ways that sustainable energy can be of benefit to them. Farmers may be many things, but dumb is not usually one of them. Misguided at times, but not dumb!

    I still have hope!

    Inspiration is hard to come by. You have to take it where you find it. --- Bob Dylan.

    by figbash on Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 09:06:05 AM PDT

  •  Rural Development Strategies (0+ / 0-)

    Part of the idea that rural communities can adapt depends on their ability to prosper by doing so - rural development.  A brief look at the housing and infrastructure in my rural Maine town shows that we have experienced periods of significant wealth.  The resources that produced that wealth are still here, but the policies that let that wealth accumulate and stay in the community no longer exist.  Every state probably has different opportunities and problems, but a collaboration between entities like the USDA and state land grant universities should be able to craft a reasonable patchwork by which to shape the needed state and national changes.  For what it's worth, the sale of local business to national corporations, and the change of railroads to rent seeking organizations seem to me to be the primary culprits in bleeding the rural economy in my state.

  •  Diversity in national green groups (0+ / 0-)

    This is a real problem for groups like the Sierra Club and Green Corps that mostly hire people from urban, privileged backgrounds in the northeast or west coast. They're slow to recognize rural issue and have major problems organizing in rural areas. I'm not sure what it will take to make them change.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site