Skip to main content

    Good Morning Kossacks and Welcome to Morning Open Thread (MOT)
We're known as the MOTley Crew and you can find us here every morning at 6:30 Eastern. Feel free to volunteer to take a day - permanently or just once in awhile. With the auto-publish feature you can set it and forget it. Sometimes the diarist du jour shows up much later, that's the beauty of Open Thread...it carries on without you! Just let us know in the comments.

Click on the MOT - Morning Open Thread ♥ if you'd like us to show up in your stream every day.

          Photobucket

Today marks the 92nd anniversary of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, certified on August 26, 1920 commemorating a woman's right to vote.  In 1971 Bella Abzug introduced legislation, which was passed by Congress, designating this date as Women's Equality Day.  

Some of you may not know that women had the right to vote in some states during the 1770s, but by 1784 women began losing that right state by state.  New Jersey was the last state to revoke voting rights for women in 1807.

Although the suffrage amendment was first introduced in Congress in 1878, it took until 1918 for the House to pass it and 1919 for the Senate to pass it as well.  The law then required ratification of three-quarters of the states and in August of 1920 the man holding the crucial vote was a young Tennessean, Harry Burn.

Burn had supported and voted with the anti-suffrage forces, but his mother wrote him a letter begging him to vote for suffrage.  When it came time for his vote he realized that an anti-suffrage vote would produce a 48-48 tie and decided to vote as his mother had urged him. So it was on August 18, 1920, Tennessee became the 36th and deciding state needed for ratification and eight days later, the 19th amendment became law.

This 1914 Illustration shows a little girl standing at the peak of a mountain, holding a banner labeled "Achievement" in one hand and toting bundles labeled "Votes, Equality, and Rights" with the other. She is starting to cry, perhaps because she realizes there is nowhere else to go and now that she has reached the peak, she can't go back.
In many ways I feel the illustration above is as appropriate today as it was in 1914.  Although our voting rights are well established, we are still lugging around the heavy bundles of "Equality" and "Rights".  I do not agree though, that there is nowhere else to go and that we have reached our peak, instead it is if we have cleared one mountain top only to discover we have more climbing to do.  And the load hasn't gotten any lighter.

History is an odd thing.  In this 1999 Letter to the Editor, by Jo Freeman entitled Gender Gaps in Presidential Elections it is shown that the first voting gender gap was noted in the 1928 presidential election with reports indicating that women were ten percent more likely to vote than men.  

As this letter points out, women will vote with the party that supports the promotion of their rights:

What's notable about this history is not merely that there was a gender gap prior to 1980, but that the pattern shifted. Previously the Republican Party had been the beneficiary of woman suffrage; subsequently the Democratic Party was. Furthermore, this change correlates with different attitudes by the national parties toward women and women's rights. While partisan differences were not large prior to 1980, they were present. Historically, it was the Republican Party that was the party of women's rights, and the Democratic Party that was the home of anti-feminism. After the new feminist movement rose in the 1960s-70s, the parties switched sides.
Women are more reliable voters than men -- in the 2004 Presidential Election 54% of women voted as opposed to 46% of men voting and in the 2008 Presidential Election 53% of women voted vs 47% of men.

Clearly the Democrats support women's rights and just as clearly the Republicans do not.  The GOP has shifted so far into extremism that I have begun to wonder that should they gain enough control and enact the abortion/birth control legislation they favor, if our voting rights just might be next under their guillotine.

Just take a look at a sampling of current news headlines:

~ GOP Lawmaker: Planned Parenthood is "Getting Wealthy on Murder For Hire"

~ Personhood USA Files Petition With Supreme Court

~ Court Rules Texas Can Defund Planned Parenthood

~ Human Life Amendment Drafted For Republican Party Platform

~ Alaska Republican Says Women Should Have to Get Permission From Men to Get an Abortion

~ A Giant Step Backwards In Women's Rights

~ Senate Republicans Block Democrats' Equal Pay Bill For Women

~ GOP Stalls Violence Against Women Act Renewal

~ Partisan Politics Hurt Women Worldwide

~ Revictimizing Native Women For Political Purposes

~ Birth-Control Hearing Was "Like Stepping Into A Time Machine"

Let me note that with the exception of three articles, all of the above headlines have appeared within the last 82 days.  What is shocking is the GOP's assertion that there is no "War on Women".  Wrong again, GOP, the only made up war is your friend, Bill O'Reilly's "War on Christmas".

I want to leave you with something powerful. This diary, A Mother's Day Conversation by JeffLieber was published in 2009. It is short and to the point.  I have linked to it several times and it never fails to stir that determination deep inside me to ensure my daughters and granddaughters never have to live without a choice.

Originally posted to MOT - Morning Open Thread on Sun Aug 26, 2012 at 03:30 AM PDT.

Also republished by Feminism, Pro-Feminism, Womanism: Feminist Issues, Ideas, & Activism and Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site