Skip to main content

hungrycoyote has a good write up regarding the The 1965 Charles Cotner Case, and it provides a great brief into the case and some good details. What I would like to focus on in this diary is the importance of elections and our judiciary system.

With that I'll be introducing you to the Indiana Judiciary system and how elections can influence it. Normally when you get to the supreme level, Judges are appointed but very often people lack realization that those appointees often come from lower courts where those judges are selected from partisan elections.

So lets hammer the orange gavel, get beyond the corn fields and look into the Indiana Judiciary system.

Indiana, like many states has a mish mash of various courts. What most people think of court is actually a portion of the total court system that might exist in that state. In Indiana for instance when it comes to constitutional courts we have three constitutional courts. These three courts consist of the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, and the Circuit Court. Each has a very distinct purpose and purveyance when it comes to law. Now that is not the limit of courts in Indiana, thanks to state law we also have a myriad of probate, town/city, and small claims courts as well.

The Circuit Court could be considered the heavy lifter of the three constitutional courts. This is the court that prosecutes offenders of the state law and hears cases presented by the state. As the example of Cotner above, he was prosecuted and heard in the Indiana Circuit court and was eventually sentenced in the Circuit Court.

The Appeals court is just that, they hear appeals from the Circuit Court. When decisions are handed down from the Circuit Court, such as a sentence from a prosecution..when filing an appeal it is heard from bench from an Appeals judge. They weigh the case on merit and decide if necessary to pass it on to the State Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is just that, the end all be all. At least until you file for federal review of the case. They take cases from the Appeal court and review them or defer to the lower circuit court decisions.

That is a lot of judges, so where do all these judges come from?

Well lets start with the circuit courts. In Indiana these judges are actually elected in partisan elections for each county. Yep that's right, D or R these judges actually run election campaigns to get elected to the bench. Well, truth be told they often ride the coat tails of the local prosecutor and assume the same campaign the prosecutors of the county/city but you get the idea. So decisions regarding the mundane are often handled by folks who have been elected in a partisan matter.

We'll get to the importance of that latter, lets keep rolling on the remaining two of Indiana's three major courts.

The remaining portions of the courts are appointed by the governor from a list of three names submitted by the state judicial nominating commission. The Indiana nominating commission is chaired by fine folks chosen by a combination of the Governor appointed positions and another few from the Indiana Bar Association. It is chaired by the chief justice of the Indiana Supreme court and is responsible for both nomination of replacements to the appellate but also for hearing complaints regarding the court.

As you can imagine reading to this point, the Judiciary system is a very self serving and feeding system and that it very often feeds from the Governors office with a smattering dash of local elections influence. However, it is very often that Governor that sets the Judicial tone, or rather his judiciary aids setting the tone based on the influence of outside parties to get X person on the bench or Y person in the court.

But there is a counter to that. Lets revisit those Circuit Courts shall we?

In the majority of Counties in Indiana these circuit courts are partisan in nature. So that yes we have Judges running on either a D or R ticket, however what most people miss is that very often as these judges serve their terms and do their jobs, slugging through the day in and day out of ruling over drug convictions, rape charges, breaking and entering, traffic violations (woe be the judge to end up in traffic court), and even sodomy charges, and that these circuit court judges will in all actuality often end up as potential nominations for the various appellate courts.

So what of that Cotner case of some years back?

There were some mitigating circumstances to the case. Cotner technically pleaded guilty on the assumption that a mitigating circumstance would be applied to his sentence. The Circuit court judge at the time in Jasper County, an elected position remember, decided to vacate any mitigation regarding the case and allow prosecution on full and accept the guilty pleading from the accused.

How did Cotner get his sentence vacated then. Technically speaking he was guilty in accordance with the law, and he plead guilty to said law. I hate to say this, but as a law junkie Cotner got off on a technicality of the 4th amendment meaning that his due process was violated.

The short version of this long version is that his guilty plea was vacated and not allowed to stand because of the fact that previous case law would have vacated his plea based on circumstances involved. Now, had the judge presiding the case (elected judge remember that), done his job he would have recognize this simple technicality and corrected it or rather deferred to the prosecution to correct their case if they wished it to proceed.

In short, had due process been followed Cotner on technical details could have been prosecuted properly and convicted in violation of Indiana law. Or course technically in second review chances are high that a reversal would occurred anyway based on the Griswold decision, but the short long story is that a competent and smart circuit Judge would have caught these facts.

So why would a Judge ignore the duty that is appointed to him when he/she takes a bench? Records are sparse for back in 65 but who knows, perhaps the Judge in Jasper County was facing an election upcoming and getting a conviction with the Cotner case could have given him some ammo towards said election?

So that bring it back to the original point of the diary, that Elections matter. At a local level and at a federal level. Here in Indiana most appointee spots for the Judiciary at both state and local are around 10 years but in your state and local level that may vary. So very often choices made decades in the past can have deep ramifications in the present. And this is what we are presented this year at the federal level really. We are looking at least one appointee at the federal level in the next four years, perhaps even two.

If Mitt gets in office, you can damn sure that the current conservative libertarian leaning court will get another appointee that will strengthen that even further. If Obama is in office however, we have a chance at reversing that conservative stronghold in the Judiciary system.

At least in most state courts, the appointee is for a set term. Granted here in Indiana its merited in decade lengths, but at the Federal level however, its for life...and life matters...big time.

I hope the diary encourages you to look at your state Judiciary, it is often an overlooked part of our civic system and government. However it is an integral part of it that can have long lasting impacts both in policy and implementation of said policy.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (9+ / 0-)

    --Enlighten the people, generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like spirits at the dawn of day. - Thomas Jefferson--

    by idbecrazyif on Sat Aug 25, 2012 at 09:56:33 PM PDT

  •  Wow! Here in Florida our local judges are (5+ / 0-)

    elected too, but they are non-partisan elections. They don't have a D or R, or anything else beside their name. You are just presented with a list of maybe three names to choose from. I don't know for sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing, because in reality you have to know that while they may be registered as Independents, they probably lean one way or another.

    For me, Mitt reminds me of Jeff Bridges in Starman. He's like an alien that hasn't read the entire manual. You know, he's going, "Nice to be in a place where the trees are the right size. -- Robin Williams on Letterman 26 Apr 2012

    by hungrycoyote on Sat Aug 25, 2012 at 10:26:05 PM PDT

  •  Judges in WI are elected (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Carol in San Antonio

    in "non-partisan" races, but these days, nothing is non-partisan.

    The last few WI Supreme Court elections have been marred by electoral fraud, complaints of campaign lies, cronyism and incredible amounts of C-A-S-H.

    It is disgusting.

  •  Keith Hampton for Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (0+ / 0-)

    Slinkerwink's recent diary The Sleeper Race That May Surprise You is about Keith Hampton, who we hope will be the first Democrat elected to a statewide office in Texas since 1994.

    What would you say if there was a statewide race in Texas that was winnable, had a great Democratic candidate, and it would shake up the entire political scene in Texas, and have the pundits eat their cowboy hats?
    Well, we have such a race where Keith Hampton is running against Sharon “Killer” Keller for the Presiding Judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
    Inspired by slink and Keith, I donated to his campaign, and was really astounded when he called me last week in thanks, and to invite me to a fundraiser he's planning for San Antonio in September.  My reaction to his phone call really brought home to me just how important phone banking is!

    I encourage everyone to support Keith Hampton for Presiding Judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals:  Hampton4Judge.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site