Skip to main content

Two men, one a real-life hero, the other a fictional character, epitomize the contrast between philosophies of shared aspirations and self-centered egoism. One put a man on the moon, the other launched the Tea Party.

There's a minor boulevard that runs through the heart of a local business park here in Omaha named after a fictional character in Ayn Rand's novel 'Atlas Shrugged.' Forbes magazine contributor Rob Clarfeld described John Galt as epitomizing 'all that is glorious of capitalism in its purist form — innovation, self-reliance, and freedom from government interference." In order words, he's the ideal Libertarian, the quintessential Tea Party candidate. He is the male surrogate, who in a tiresome 64-page monologue propounds much of that Rand thought and believed about society, the winners and the loser, the deserving elite, the undeserving poor.

Galt's name not only appears on street signs, but on coffee mugs and tee-shirts, along with some of Rand's more famous (or infamous, depending on your perspective) quotations, such as "I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."

In contrast, Neil Armstrong, who just passed away, was no less eloquent in his personal philosophy, stating, for example, "I guess we all like to be recognized not for one piece of fireworks, but for the ledger of our daily work." One spectacular piece of fireworks, however, made him far more immortal than Rand's John Galt. He will be forever remembered as the first man to walk on Earth's moon, uttering the now timeless phrase, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind."

What separates Armstrong from Galt, apart from the fact that one is a real life, flesh and blood human being and hero, and the other is the fictitious machination of deeply troubled soul who, as a teenager, witnessed the Bolsheviks appropriate her parents prosperous St. Petersburg pharmacy business in the 1917 Russian revolution, is that what Armstrong accomplished was made possible by the very government program Rand and her libertarian acolytes despise and denigrate. That Apollo mission, and those that preceded it (Mercury, Gemini) and those that followed (Skylab, Space Shuttle, ISS), were only possible through the joint efforts of tens of thousands of people, not to mention, billions in taxpayer dollars. With complete justification, we Americans and those who aided us from Africa to Australia, could hang a banner across the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum's space exhibit stating "We, The People Built This Collectively!"

John Galt and his "I Built It" ilk would never have condoned it, much less funded it. It took vision and the federal government, through NASA, to coordinate such a massive undertaking and pay the bills. Only now, after the technologies have been tried and tested, at government expense, can private companies like SpaceX enter the commercial market for manned space flight.

When Rand published 'Atlas Shrugs' in 1957, the hated Soviets were the masters of space. Sputnik was a wake-up call and the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) became NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration the following year. By 1969, the United States had won the "Race to the Moon," and the process spun off countless new enterprises and products that dramatically increased both the wealth and prestige of the nation. If there is a true, 20th century high water market for America, it had to be that day in July, 1969 when Armstrong radioed from the moon, "Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed."

Originally posted to My EV World on Sun Aug 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight, In Support of Labor and Unions, and Astro Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site