Skip to main content

Making Teflon look sticky
Late last night, on a Friday news dump of course, the federal government announced it is ending its four-year investigation of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio—with nothing:
Federal prosecutors closed an exhaustive four-year FBI criminal investigation and grand-jury probe targeting Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, former County Attorney Andrew Thomas and their top deputies, saying there will be no indictments. Arizona Republic
Here's a PDF of the US Attorney's very short three-paragraph press release, in which they really offer no reasons or background, and simply say their office has ended its probe into the multiple allegations of civil rights abuse, perjury, and misuse of funds. In another letter to County Attorney Bill Montgomery the feds wrote:
prosecution was declined because of a lack of evidence or an insurmountable burden of proof.
Huh? When you consider the details listed in the 2010 Munnell Memo alone, a 63-page document written by a former chief deputy that's filled with cronyism, racism, lies, misappropriation of funds, illegal campaign schemes, and outright fraud, it's hard to imagine how the feds arrived at their "lack of proof" nonsense. That memo cost Arpaio's key aides their jobs, but not him?!

Even some Republicans found the ruling mind-boggling. Former County Attorney Rick Romley, for example, was left scratching his noggin:

Romley said he was "truly puzzled" by the decision not to prosecute. "To say there was insufficient evidence, with the amount of information that we sent their way, sends a horrible message." Arizona Republic
Susan Schuerman was a secretary to County Supervisor Don Stapley, an elected official who was indicted by Arpaio and former County Attorney Andrew Thomas. She was also followed and harassed by the Sheriff's goons, all part of the Arpaio-Thomas strategy to discredit, humiliate, and bully elected officials, staff, and reporters who stood in the way of their police state tactics.
"Having lived through this and witnessed all of these outrageous behaviors ... I'm shocked that no charges would be brought," she said. "It's all politics. I think this is bigger than they are (the Justice Department). I think the Justice Department was inept in their handling of this, and I have almost no faith left." Arizona Republic
County Supervisors Mary Rose Wilcox and Don Stapley have spent millions fighting Arpaio's empty lawsuits, and both have filed counter-suits against his office:
Wilcox expressed shock at the U.S. attorney's decision, stammering for words. "I can't believe it. I can't imagine why they would do that, when there's so much evidence there, particularly from the Thomas case," she said. "I just am floored." Arizona Republic
Another County Supervisor is equally miffed:
Andrew Kunasek, one of five members of the county Board of Supervisors and a victim of Arpaio and Thomas' vendettas, is furious about the decision, which he calls "an assault on our system of justice." New Times
For his part, County Attorney Andrew Thomas was later disbarred for his participation in Arpaio's vindictive schemes. But the feds chose not to file even one indictment against Sheriff Arpaio!

Paul Penzone, who is challenging Joe Arpaio in this November's election, reacted:

"There are obvious failings in the Sheriff's Office. The fact that they did not rise to a level of criminal indictment does not lessen that they are failings." Arizona Republic
We might ask the 400 victims of sex crimes, some children as young as two, crimes Arpaio failed to investigate or prosecute, if there are "failings" at the Sheriff's office. We certainly need to ask the voters of Maricopa County, who've seen this birther blowhard rack up tens of millions of dollars in lawsuits while crime increases, unlike every other county in the state, whether there are "failings" in the Sheriff's office. Let's hope voters see things differently than the US Department of Justice.

The Friday decision, by the way, has no bearing on the long list of lawsuits pending against Arpaio—some filed by politicians and judges who were indicted and harassed by him (like Stapley and Wilcox), others brought by Hispanics who allege racial profiling by the Sheriff's deputies, another filed by reporters who were arrested on bogus charges, and still others filed by the families of prisoners who were tortured or even murdered while in the Sheriff's custody.

No, this isn't over. But the worst part could be this November. Paul Penzone for Sheriff.  

Originally posted to Maggie's Farm on Sat Sep 01, 2012 at 08:53 AM PDT.

Also republished by Baja Arizona Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site