Skip to main content

Democrats control the Colorado Senate by a 20-15 margin.  As in many states, redistricting has added more drama to an already high-stakes election.  As I've written previously, our Reapportionment Commission was made up 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans and 1 Unaffiliated this time.  In the end the Unaffiliated chair of the committee voted with the Democrats.

The map they approved created an especially large number of competitive seats in both houses.  In the Senate, Republican candidates have done as many favors for Democrats as redistricting did.  In the southeast and northwest of the state, 2 seats are now prime opportunities for Democrats in an election where they're otherwise playing defense.

Once again, the numbers used are Bennet-Buck since that is the baseline for Democrats winning statewide.

SD4 (Scheffel-R) - 33%-63%
Nothing to see here in this Douglas County seat.  Safe R.

SD8 (OPEN R) - 46%-47.5%
The first unexpected opportunity for Democrats is here in SD8.  The moderate incumbent Jean White (R) was unseated in an especially nasty primary by Rep. Randy Baumgardner (R) who was redistricted out of his house seat.  White has yet to endorse her primary opponent and Democrats now have hope in this seat against the more conservative and less-likable Baumgardner.  Late in the primary, it came out that Baumgardner was living with an unregistered sex offender.  If Democrat Emily Tracy can raise the money, expect Democrats to hit Baumgardner with this over and over.Lean R.  

SD10 (OPEN R) - 32%-62%
Redistricting left this northern Colorado Springs district with no incumbent.  In another coup for conservatives, Owen Hill (R) beat out Rep. Larry Liston (R) in the primary.  In a world where Larry Liston is a liberal, Republicans have truly gone off the deep end.  Safe R.

SD12 (Cadman-R) - 34%-60%
Drawn out of his seat in SD10, Minority Leader Bill Cadman found himself in the same seat as Sen. Keith King (R).  King stepped aside and now the Minority Leader has a free ride to November 6th.  Safe R.

SD14 (OPEN D) - 56%-38.5%
I have trouble considering this Fort Collins-based seat competitive, but in an open seat situation you can never be sure.  Rep. John Kefalas (D) should be fine here in a Presidential year, he currently represents the more Republican half of the district in the house.  Likely D.

SD17 (OPEN D) - 58%-38%
In another era Republicans may have been able to put up a fight here, but in 2012 Boulder County is almost entirely off-limits for them.  Rep. Matt Jones will have no trouble wining in November.  Safe D.

SD18 (Heath-D) - 76%-20%
Rollie Heath may not be able to win much, but in this seat centered around the City of Boulder, he can't help but win another term.  Safe D.

SD19 (Hudak-D) - 48.5%-45%
Unable to shore up this seat anymore, Democrats were bracing for a tough fight for Evie Hudak (who only won by 2 points in 2008).  But Hudak has proven to be a great fundraiser and tough campaigner.  Add that to missteps by her opposition and this seat appears to be moving further down the list from the #1 target by Republicans, can't be sure until the outside groups really start their efforts here.  Tossup.

SD21 (NEW SEAT) - 55%-36%
This Commerce City seat was created as one of the new Hispanic-majority seats Chairman Carrera worked for.  Taking in the bluest areas of Adams County, Jessie Ulibarri (D) should have no trouble winning and becoming the first Hispanic gay man in the Colorado Senate.  Safe D.

SD22 (OPEN R) - 49%-45%
This seat could almost be considered new.  A last minute creation by Democrats on the Reapportionment Committee, this district transformed SD22 from a south-Jeffco Republican stronghold to a swing district running through Lakewood and Ken Caryl and it's incumbent was drawn completely out of the district.  Rep. Andy Kerr (D) and Rep. Ken Summers (R) have jumped from their face-off in the house to this race.  They've been keeping it close in money and are both able campaigners.  This could be the closest race in the state on Election Day and money will be pouring into this area from both sides and other groups and campaigns.  Tossup.

SD23 (OPEN R) - 41%-53%
In yet another conservative victory, Vicki Marble (R-Crazytown) won over the conservative, but sensible Rep. Glenn Vaad (R).  Unfortunately this sea, was contested by Democrats in 2008, has been drawn even redder than before.  Democrats have no hope here in the near future.  Safe R.

SD25 (Hodge-D) - 47.5%-45%
On paper this is the most competitive seat held by Democrats this election cycle.  Fortunately, Senator Mary Hodge (D) has proven to be an difficult target for Republicans with her moderate profile and support in the business community.  This is not safe by any means, but certainly safer than some of her colleagues in more favorable terrain.  Lean D.

SD26 (Newell-D) - 50.5%-45.5%
When "Landside Linda" Newell won her first election in 2008 by 195 votes, Republicans were furious and have been itching to have it back ever since.  Newell has since developed reasonable profile for this swing suburban district.  Democrats worked hard to shore up this district, but the CO Supreme Court left them with few options, so the district now has an arm reaching into Democratic-leaning unincorporated areas of Arapahoe County and avoids redder turf in Centennial.  Republicans have put up a formidable challenger in businessman David Kerber.  With some ability to self-fund, Kerber has more Cash-on-Hand than Newell as of the last report.  Democrats will be forced to spend a lot of resources to save Newell as a result.  Tossup.

SD27 (OPEN R) - 45.5%-50%
This district should be at least nominally competitive on paper, but Democrats have never been able to put up much of a fight in Centennial.  The Republican candidate, Rep. David Balmer isn't exactly well-liked, but he can raise money like no one else in the legislature.  His Democratic opponent, David Paladino hasn't raised nearly enough money to compete and in less than stellar year for Democrats he probably won't be able to make a race of it.  Likely R.

SD28 (OPEN D) - 51%-42.5%
This southern Aurora-based seat tipped control to Democrats in the 2004 election, but after redistricting it was made redder to help shore up SD26 to the west.  Rep. Nancy Todd (D) is running for this open seat and knows how to campaign, and her opponent has raised almost nothing.  Republicans wont' be able to afford to play here with so many other priorities.  Likely D.

SD29 (Carroll-D) - 52%-42%
As a member of the reapportionment committee, Morgan Carroll took one for the team by absorbing all of rural Arapahoe County.  This definitely pulled the district performance down to earth for this urban northern Aurora district.  Despite the changes, down-ballot this district is safe enough for most Democrats and Republicans won't make a play here.  Likely D.

SD31 (Steadman-D) - 68.5%-27%
Another primary was avoided when Sen. Joyce Foster (D) stepped aside for Pat Steadman when their homes were drawn together in this district, a result of Denver's population growth not keeping up with the rest of the state.  Despite Steadman (the only gay man in the Senate) having a gay opponent, he's safe as can be in this heavily Democratic district. Safe D.

SD32 (Aguilar-D) - 67%-28%
My home district, nothing to see here.  Safe D.

SD33 (Johnston-D) - 82%-15%
The most Democratic district in the state.  Safe D.

SD35 (NEW SEAT) - 45%-49%
Depending on how you slice it, this is where Denver's lost Senate seat went.  This new district stretches from the San Luis Valley to the Arkansas Valley and south-easatern plains.  While certainly trending Republican and voting accordingly at the top of the ballot, this area is ancestrally Democratic and Democrats still do well enough down ballot.  Democrats landed a great recruit in Costilla County Commissioner Crestina Martinez (D).  A young Latina, she has a good chance at this 36% Hispanic district.  Republicans can't let this district slip past them if they want to take the Senate.  Expect heavy spending by the parties.  Tossup.

This leaves 7 Dems and 8 Republicans not up for election this year.  Add the safe and likely seats on both sides and the margin is 16 Democrats and 13 Republicans.  This means Republicans have to take 5 of the remaining seats for a majority.  So there is no margin for error, they have to keep SD8 and sweep all 4 tossups, a feat that seems unlikely in even a neutral year.  The Senate as a whole Leans Democratic.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  CU buffs just shamefully re-signed with GOP radio (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    so super limbaugh station 850 KOA can say "home of the buffs and rush limbaugh!" while it and its blowhards swiftboat and lie and help elect republican regents for the university and defeat progressive initiatives.

    if you don't mind, i'll repeat a suggestion:

    with so much at stake (0+ / 0-)
    it would makes sense to me not to ignore talk radio action in the state.

    the GOP is coordinating their TV  and  radio attacks on dem candidates. the radio is going to do a lot more work over time, basically free (paid by local business sponsors) in general tying in with national themes but also it will be localized. the GOP think tanks will be a source of guest talkers. it'll ramp up toward election time and may include attacks based on rumors and paid callers.

    why can't the state dem party HQ put together a few computers online with some transcription software to automate a searchable database of what the state RW blowhards are saying about their candidates?

    search it a few times a day for attacks and respond to lies and rumors. a candidate that might be particularly strong on alt energy might get attacked on radio by a heritage foundation denier guest, for instance.

     take the results to the media ("here's what the liar said on this station") and challenge the BS instead of waiting for the results to show up weeks later when it's too late as lies in letters to the editor, etc., which is the usual pattern in this country the last 20 years. all state dem campaigns  need to be doing  that for their candidates- if they don't know what's happening on the radio, the right's best weapon, they'r enot really getting their candidates' backs.

    is the swiftboating happening from a soapbox with local university team logos all over it? many of the RW megastations have athletic associations with state universities. are student and staff supporters of the dem candidate OK  with their unis endorsing the GOP and their candidates and radio stations that work to defund their universities, raise their  student aid interest rates and tuition, push racism and sexism, deny global warming, elect regents who do that, etc?

    i recently heard the NM sec of state get a whole hour on the local morning blowhard's show to make excuses for a voter purge happening just before the election. during that show there was an ad for the UNM lobos. that was a week or two after i got a few minutes to talk to the state dem party chair to suggest what i suggested above. he was generous with his time and listened but he said they really didn't have the time or recourses. oh well.

    This is a list of 76 universities for Rush Limbaugh that endorse global warming denial, racism, sexism, and partisan lying by broadcasting sports on Limbaugh radio stations.

    by certainot on Wed Sep 05, 2012 at 08:14:57 PM PDT

  •  What do the percentages correlate to? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Prez performance or Senate (Bennet) performance?

    Hail to the king, baby.

    by KingofSpades on Wed Sep 05, 2012 at 10:14:13 PM PDT

  •  Thanks for this. (0+ / 0-)

    I'm glad things are looking real good there.

    Hail to the king, baby.

    by KingofSpades on Wed Sep 05, 2012 at 10:40:32 PM PDT

  •  what are chances of, (puke), senator coors? (0+ / 0-)

    This is a list of 76 universities for Rush Limbaugh that endorse global warming denial, racism, sexism, and partisan lying by broadcasting sports on Limbaugh radio stations.

    by certainot on Thu Sep 06, 2012 at 07:19:40 AM PDT

    •  Congressman. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ban nock

      I think Perlmutter wins by virtue of outworking Coors.  

      If you listen to fools, the Mob Rules

      by CO Democrat on Thu Sep 06, 2012 at 09:03:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  coors will stand on the buffs-sponsored soapbox (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        ban nock

        850 KOA and gain a lot of votes just for that. students for perlmutter ought to be pissed off.

        like i said in my post above i wish dems would monitor RW radio and respond- who knows what they'll start putting out about perlmutter.

        i just heard limbaugh list a bunch of charges against eliz warren suggesting real estate forecosure profits, high interest loans , shafting the poor, etc. those national charges will probably not be answered by her campaign or her supporters but will be heard all over her state. maybe it's true.

        thanks for the correction- that's a lot better, still not good to have a coors in there.

        This is a list of 76 universities for Rush Limbaugh that endorse global warming denial, racism, sexism, and partisan lying by broadcasting sports on Limbaugh radio stations.

        by certainot on Thu Sep 06, 2012 at 10:09:22 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I've helped Perlmutter a lot over the years. (3+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          certainot, KingofSpades, ban nock

          I'm actually going to do another walk for him this afternoon.  Coors may have the advertising right now, but he doesn't have the energy.  Perlmutter does.  I am worried about this, but I was worried about Frazier 2 years ago more than this.  Perlmutter's pulled through some tough spots before.  He'll beat Coors.  

          If you listen to fools, the Mob Rules

          by CO Democrat on Thu Sep 06, 2012 at 11:42:27 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site