Skip to main content

A winning convention is one who has the candidate's back.  A candidate who wins has the unwavering support of his convention delegates.  The most effective combination is when the convention is holding up the candidate, not a candidate having to hold up and hold together his convention.

A winning convention is one who cast all 5,200+ delegate votes to its candidate and confirms with no nays.

A winning convention is one whose delegates say 'nay' against having it all to end.

I've been around a minute in this life now and most political party conventions have been stuffy pageants with balloons filled with hot air.

And speeches forgotten the next day.

Maybe because the stakes have never been higher than they are today has caused the DNC to retool their conventions.  Whatever has happened, they need to keep this going.

The Democrats of the past have been afraid to go 'all in'.  They didn't know the difference between being loyal vs. being in lock-step.    We fell in the past because we wouldn't or couldn't be united when it really counted.  

I didn't know who this bunch of folk were, but I like them much better!  A governor telling Democrats to grow a backbone?  What?  

A former President calling out the opposition for having some kind of balls brass for trying to call out the current President on something they did themselves?  Huh?

Speech after speech of we aren't going backwards; we are moving forward?

Got a cold?

Whoop ass speech after speech calling out the GOP on its lies, obstructionism and dirty voter suppression tricks?

What party is this again?

Simply put, this was THE best DNC Convention EVER.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, take your bow.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site