Skip to main content

U.S. Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at his Illinois primary night rally in Schaumburg, Illinois, March 20, 2012. REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES  - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS)
Why can't someone else make these decisions for me?
It's not exactly news that Mitt Romney has taken every position on reproductive rights, short of marching in the streets to demand free abortion on demand. (And given how badly he's losing, don't rule that out just yet.)

So Mitt's latest attempt to flip-flop his way around the issue—this time, during an exercise in hackery with Very Serious Journalist David Gregory—isn't news, exactly, as much as it's the latest episode in Mitt's excellent adventure in flailing and failing:

GREGORY:  I want to ask you one question on the social issue and that is abortion.  You were on this program in 2007 and you said that you would fight to overturn Roe v. Wade.  I know you said this is an issue for the courts.  I ask you now would a President Romney fight to overturn Roe v. Wade? And what would you do in that fight to achieve that goal?
Let's just pause right there to contemplate for a moment why it is that David Gregory has a job. (Thinking ... thinking ... ) He's going to ask Mitt all of one question on "the social issue," and that's his question? That's it? Mitt Romney said something five years ago, and Gregory wants to know if that's still Mitt's position?

Did Gregory not get the memo about the 30,000 positions Romney has taken since then? Did he miss the interview Mitt gave just a few short weeks ago in which he said the issue has been "settled for some time in the courts"? Or does Gregory think that if Mitt says something on a different network, it doesn't count and Gregory doesn't have to know about it?

Of course, Mitt being Mitt, he couldn't even handle the journalistic ineptitude from Gregory without stepping all over himself and saying something stupid:

MR. ROMNEY:  Well, there are a number of things I think that need to be said about preserving and protecting the life of the unborn child.  And I recognize there are two lives involved: the mom and the unborn child. And I believe that people of good conscience have chosen different paths in this regard.  But I am pro-life and will intend, if I'm president of the United States, to encourage pro-life policies.  I don't--

GREGORY:  Just encourage or fight for it to be overturned?

MR. ROMNEY:  Well, I don't actually make the decision the Supreme Court makes and so they'll have to make their own decision. But, I will, for instance, I'll reverse the president's decision on using U.S. funds to pay for abortion outside this country.  I don't think also the taxpayers here should have to pay for abortion in this country.  Those things I think are consistent with my pro-life position. And I hope to appoint justices to the Supreme Court that will follow the law and the constitution.  And it would be my preference that they reverse Roe v. Wade and therefore they return to the people and their elected representatives the decisions with regards to this important issue.

So Romney's most recent position is that this settled-for-some-time-in-the-courts issue should be settled in the courts again, and Romney is hoping to appoint activist judges who will re-settle this settled issue. Because even though every politician, including the ones running for dogcatcher of Podunk, takes a position on reproductive rights, Romney is such a coward that he'd really rather leave it up to someone else. Or forbid reporters from asking him any questions at all. No wonder the Republican Party is running in fear from the issue they usually love to discuss.

Romney's latest—gosh, I sure hope the Supreme Court decides this for me—is yet another shift from the other various positions he's taken, but since Gregory apparently isn't aware that Romney has said anything on the issue since 2007, he obviously is in no position to ask Romney any further questions on the issue—like, oh, say, "What the hell are you talking about? You just said last month that this is a settled issue!"

We'd run out of internet space if we listed all the other follow-up questions Gregory failed to ask—like how Romney plans to protect women's lives if his activist judges overturn Roe v. Wade, just to name one of a million. That Mitt offered yet another take on this issue escaped Gregory completely, but at least Gregory got to check his "social issue" question off the list and Mitt got to offer a bunch of incoherent nonsense without being called on it. Guess that's a win for Gregory and a win for Mitt. As for those voters who might be interested in an actual answer? Too bad, but it's not like this interview was really for them anyway. And besides, they can just wait for Mitt to come up with a new answer. Shouldn't be a long wait.

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Mon Sep 10, 2012 at 09:27 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos, Pro Choice, and Abortion.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site