Skip to main content


A month ago Romney "almost" named a Tax Loophole he "might" close ... Uh oh.


What is the carried interest loophole, and why doesn’t Romney want to close it?

by Dylan Matthews, washingtonpost.com -- August 15, 2012

In an interview in Fortune Tuesday, Mitt Romney ducked a question about whether he’d close the “carried interest loophole,” which allows hedge fund managers and other executives at investment firms -- such as Bain Capital executive Mitt Romney -- to pay lower capital gains tax rates on their wages, rather than the regular income tax rates.
“What I’ve said in the past is that if something is a capital gain it should be treated as a capital gain,” Romney responded. “If something is ordinary income it should be treated as ordinary income.”
But that’s exactly the issue -- are the earnings of hedge fund and private equity executives ordinary income, or are they capital gains? In the past, the Romney campaign has signaled that Romney wants to repeal the deduction, indicating he thinks the executives’ earnings are ordinary income, not capital gains.
[...]

Senate Democrats have tried and failed to force these executives to pay normal income tax rates in recent years, a change that would bring in about $17.7 billion in new revenue over 10 years. The argument for the change is that this income is effectively a salary and should be taxed as such.
[...]


Aaah, it kind of looks like it's the Democratic Party who are the ones, trying to raise revenues by "closing Tax loopholes" for "hedge fund managers and other executives at investment firms."

You know, those "Carried Interest" loopholes -- like the kind that made Mitt and his corporate pals super-rich.



This week-end Mitt Romney did not fall for THAT "Tax Loophole" trap again. The "Carried Interest" Tax Loophole -- never mentioned this time -- is safe once again to the deep relief of Romney's super-wealthy-backers.  Whew!  That was close.


Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan Can't Say Which Tax Loopholes They'd Plug

by Laura Bassett, huffingtonpost.com -- Sep 10, 2012

[...]
"Give me an example of a loophole you would close," [David] Gregory said, after trying and failing several times to coax the candidate into giving specifics.

Romney couldn't give one.

"Well, I can tell you that people at the high end, high income taxpayers, are going to have fewer deductions and exemptions," he said. "Those numbers are going to come down. Otherwise they'd get a tax break. Otherwise they'd get a tax break. And I want to make sure people understand, despite what the Democrats said at their convention, I am not reducing taxes on high income taxpayers."
[...]

Let's not forget Mitt's got 12 million jobs to "create" -- from thin air ...


Romney vows to hold down taxes on middle class

by Callum Borchers, Boston Globe Correspondent -- Sep 10, 2012

[...]
In the interview with “Meet the Press,” Romney took a different approach.

He cited reports by Ivy League economists that suggest his tax plan could work, if he closes loopholes the Tax Policy Center deemed untouchable and succeeds in spurring economic growth. And Romney emphasized that the purpose of lowering income tax rates at the top of the scale is to benefit businesses that are taxed as individuals.
[...]


You know those "Job Creators" -- they need every Tax Loophole, Ivy League Mitt can "carry" their way -- whether it's disguised Capital Gains or not.

In Mitt's European-world, "Loopholes" are in the eye of the beholder. One man's Loophole, is simply another man's Tax Haven.



EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site