Skip to main content

Rep. Chip Cravaack has spent a great deal of time promoting HR 5544, the Minnesota Education and Investment Act, as a "win-win" for northeastern Minnesota.  While it does open up new revenue for schools by facilitating a long overdue land exchange between the state and federal government for lands contained within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, Cravaack's bill can hardly be declared a "win-win" because it steals millions from area residents. Indeed, a Republican-authored 'self executing' amendment quietly slipped into the bill in the House Rules Committee strips three counties in northeastern Minnesota of millions they are entitled to under decades old federal legislation co-sponsored by former 8th District Congressman John Blatnik.

Blatnik recognized long ago that the growing amount of land in northeastern Minnesota reserved for wilderness by the federal government created an enormous financial burden for residents and co-sponsored legislation to compensate rural counties for the loss of tax revenue. The Thye-Blatnik Act of 1948 provides for in-lieu-of-tax payments to Cook, Lake and St Louis Counties for federal wilderness land. Payment is calculated based on three-quarters of 1%  of the appraised value of the land. The federal government currently owns 600,000 acres in the BWCAW, and the counties received $6 million from the United States Forest Service in 2012. Under the proposed land exchange, an additional 86,000 acres will be transferred to the federal government and the Congressional Budget Office estimates that Lake, Cook and St Louis Counties will be eligible for an additional $6 million in payments between 2014 - 2022*.

But not if Chip Cravaack and his friends in Washington DC have their way.

Because the bill contained an increase in direct spending, it was deemed to violate the  Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 which  requires budget neutrality. As a result, House Natural Resources Committee Chair Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA)  introduced a 'manager's amendment' in the House Rules Committee that would "ensure that the State school trust lands located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness traded for equal-value federal lands within the Superior National Forest are not used to calculate payments to certain countries under the Thye-Blatnik and the Humphrey-Thye-Blatnik-Andresen Acts."

In other words, in one shady procedural move Chip Cravaack and his Tea Party friends in Washington DC stripped northeastern Minnesota residents of the rights the great Congressman John Blatnik fought for and won for them so many years ago.

The US House of Representatives did indeed pass the Cravaack-sponsored bill containing the language exempting Minnesota school trust lands from the Thye-Blatnik Act on Wednesday, 12 September:

(3) THYE-BLATNIK ACT- The Secretary shall not take into consideration the lands acquired by the United States under this Act in determining the appraised value of National Forest System lands in the State of Minnesota used for purposes of making payments to the State of Minnesota under the Act of June 22, 1948, and the Act of June 22, 1956 (commonly known as the Thye-Blatnik Act and Humphrey-Thye-Blatnik-Andresen Act; 16 U.S.C. 577c through 577h).
Yet Cravaack insists northeastern Minnesota will lose no revenue. The Mesabi Daily News reports:
In a telephone interview Wednesday night, Cravaack said he was extremely pleased that after 34 years a bill to “free these school trust fund lands” had passed the House. He also said that one opponent who said the bill would take dollars away from three counties was “deliberately misrepresenting” the facts. “Cook, Lake and St. Louis counties will not be shortchanged. It will be revenue neutral,” with the only new revenue going to Minnesota schools through mining and logging in the lands opened up outside the BWCAW for development through the exchange.

I don’t know how people can be against this bill. It doesn’t detract from the Boundary Waters at all, while providing more revenue for our schoolchildren. That’s a win-win.

A win-win?

I doubt residents of St Louis, Cook and Lake Counties, already reeling from state budget cuts and loss of local government aid, would think so. $6 million may not seem like much to New Hampshire resident Cravaack and his Tea Party cronies in Washington D.C., but to the cash-strapped counties here in northeastern Minnesota, that's real money.

Cravaack's bill as amended and passed does not serve the common good. It serves only Chip Cravaack, who so desperately needed this land exchange bill to boost his floundering re election campaign that he was willing to sell his constituents out to his Tea Party friends in Washington DC.

 And Cravaack did just that. For $6 million.

*$1 million per year in perpetuity

Cross posted from Iron Country Free Press

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  What is meant by "long over due land exchange" ? (0+ / 0-)

    Who/what/why of said land exchange?

    There are parties who have been dying to develop and settle and otherwise motorize the BWCAW for decades. I need convincing before I tip and/or rec this diary.  The unsubstantiated  need of a land exchange is too much, even though it's totally not ok that Craavack has lost $6mil for those counties; they've always had a rough time up there.

    •  The point of the diary is the $6 million in lost (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ER Doc

      revenue to counties. Cravaack is once again not telling the truth to his constituents and acting against their best interests. Re the land exchange: when the BWCAW legislation was passed in 1978, we lost control over the use of state owned land within the boundaries, and the revenue generated from use of the land. We were not compensated for this loss in any way. All we want is to exchange state land within the BWCAW for federal land outside its borders. This bill is bad for everyone, yet Cravaack is making political hay out of it. Whether one supports the land exchange is not the issue. Again, the issue raised in this diary is the exemption from Thye-Blatnik. It is critical that this be circulated because the mainstream media is totally ignoring the issue.

  •  as much as i dislike/disagree 100% (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ER Doc

    with what the Chipster is doing here i fear it'll win him points in the mostly rural area of NE MN.  

    Lots of folks in those ares (except for places like Ely and Duluth) don't like the BWCA.  They were very vocal opposition to Wellstone when he ran for Senate because of his support for the BWCA.  

  •  Why not just sell the land? (0+ / 0-)

    Handing it over to the feds for a hand-out was insane to begin with, before the $6 million ended up going elsewhere.

    Selling it would get them two paydays: once, when they sell it, and again when they tax it.

    •  The state-owned land is within the limits of BWCA (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      MGross

      It wasn't possible to sell that land. Motorized access & development aren't possible. If the land were transferred to the NPS and accounted for in the same way as the rest of the Wilderness area, the counties involved would be entitled to the $6 million. As it stands, I doubt the state is paying the counties anything for this land now, so strictly speaking, Cravaack is right in that they aren't losing anything, but it would have been nice to have this land counted in with the rest of the federally-owned land. The state will benefit from acquiring land that can be developed, but the counties probably don't get any of it, unless the land is actually sold & goes onto the property tax roll.  

      -7.25, -6.26

      We are men of action; lies do not become us.

      by ER Doc on Fri Sep 14, 2012 at 11:45:30 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site