Skip to main content

Mitt Romney smirks after attacking President Obama over the Libya attacks
Writing about Mitt Romney's astounding performance the morning we discovered that the United States ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, and 3 of his staff had been killed in a heinous attack, Dave Weigel of Slate argued:
Mitt Romney did not “gaffe” about the protest at the U.S. Embassy in Egypt or the killing of diplomats at the Benghazi Consulate. The whole concept of the “gaffe” has been Silly-Putty-ed into meaninglessness by campaign 2012, yes, but that’s not what I mean. What Mitt Romney said about the attacks, fact-challenged as it was, synced up neatly with what he’s been saying about foreign policy for years.
Weigel is right to say that the "Apology Tour" theme is consistent with what Romney has said since, well, he released his book No Apology (I never understood why someone would be so proud to have never apologized). But I submit that the episode was, nonetheless, a gaffe. Not the typical type of gaffe we are accustomed to, where a public figure accidentally tells us what they really think. Instead this was a character and judgment gaffe, where Mitt Romney accidentally demonstrated to us that his judgment and character disqualify him for the presidency.

To be sure, the substance of Romney's statements is nonsensical gibberish. But that is the modus operandi of an entire political party, the modern Republican Party. The impulses Romney succumbed to on that morning rendered naked any pretense that he is a man of judgment and character. Romney inadvertently revealed his true self and it was not pretty. And it was not someone who should be president.

Republicans are eager to hearken to the 1980 election as a model for how this election may turn out. Kos effectively demolished this silly meme. But it is worth remembering how Ronald Reagan performed on the tragic day that the attempt to rescue the hostages in Iran ended in failure. Reagan issued a somber statement expressing condolences and calling for national unity. He did not criticize the Carter Administration at all on that day. In fact, it was not until 6 days later that Reagan resumed his criticisms of President Carter's foreign policy. To be sure, it is possible that Reagan and his campaign were privately gleeful about the tragedy, but they possessed the political judgment to understand that engaging in crass politicking on that day would be unwise, indeed, dishonorable. This is not to argue that Reagan possessed the judgment and character to be a good president, but rather, that at a bare minimum, a person aspiring to be president of the United States needs to exhibit the judgment and character to refrain from the behavior Mitt Romney engaged in the morning the nation was informed of Ambassador Stevens' death.

Instead, Mitt Romney demonstrated an utter lack of character and judgment. It is not often that events provide us with authentically revealing moments of the people who run for the highest offices. Politics is a scripted affair for the most part, with actions, statements, political ads and attack lines carefully prepared. One would not have expected this event to provide such a true glimpse; after all Mitt Romney had a whole night to consider how he would behave that morning.

But after a night of thought, Mitt Romney chose to demand the attention of the cameras  after the secretary of state had delivered her moving remarks at Foggy Bottom. Romney also chose to insist on being heard immediately preceding the president's remarks to the nation.

And what did he choose to say with this moment? After a night's reflection, Mitt Romney chose to relaunch his baseless, tasteless political attacks. It was astonishing.

Mitt Romney gaffed. He inadvertently demonstrated that he does not possess the judgment and character to be president of the United States.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site