Skip to main content

Romney is disdainful of people who think they're "entitled" to health care, housing, food, and education.  Everyone's entitled to their opinion. But I look at his running mate and I have to ask...

How in the world did they settle on Paul "Petey" Ryan as his running mate?  I'm not talking about actual running.  That would be a cinch. Romney doesn't run and Ryan isn't as much of one as he claims.   No, I'm talking about the decision to put Ryan on the ticket.  Didn't anyone check his background?

Politico, a source that is well-regarded in conservative circles, ran a flattering profile on Ryan after he was tapped to join the ticket, titled, "Who is Paul Ryan? 10 facts about the VP pick."

Some of the "facts"  (e.g., "works out like a warrior") have since been subject to closer scrutiny and found to be -- overstated.   However a couple of facts are well-documented.  In fact, they have been a core part of Ryan's narrative for years. As Terry Gross noted in her story on Ryan

In terms of the importance of taking responsibility for yourself, that's something that Paul Ryan had to do when he was young. This is central to your piece about him is that when he was 16, his father died, and not only did Paul Ryan's father die, Paul Ryan discovered his father's body, which, you know, had to be a very traumatic experience. And it was a turning point. You know, he had to become independent. His mother went back to school. His grandmother had Alzheimer's, moved in with him. At the same time, he got Social Security after his father's death because his father died. [emph added]
That's right, Paul Ryan's family collected SS survivor benefits.  When he died, Ryan's father was gainfully employed to the point they were a single income family.  Moreover, there was enough money being doled out to the family that it supported his mother's returning to school -- instead of getting a full-time job.   Moreover, there was enough money to help support an ailing grandmother.  Ryan later went on to use the payments he continued to receive until he was 21.  That was how he paid for college.  Petey didn't pay any taxes for that.  He didn't pay any taxes on the benefits he received.  

As I said, this was no secret when Ryan was picked.   I don't know if he knew about his prospective boss's antipathy to that sort of largesse, but didn't someone tell Romney he was tying his future to a guy with a life-long dependency on government handouts?  

Don't get me wrong.  I am not opposed to this sort of assistance.  If a man has been paying in to Social Security and he leaves a family behind due to no fault of his own -- I think we all benefit from helping the kids continue with their education in the house they grew up in.    

Of course, Romney disagrees with that, and likely would fault the older Ryan for not taking responsibility for his own health, but I digress.

I think providing resources so a stay-at-home mom can go out and get the skills she needs to enter the workforce is also something that benefits all of us.  Providing the money to help a family care for a sick elderly parent also benefits all of us.  Unlike Romney, I don't see anything wrong with that.  I think these aspects of The New Deal and the The Great Society are some of the best things Democrats have done for the nation.

Romney, of course, disagrees with this.  He can afford to hold that opinion.  His father might disagree with him, but that's another story.  What I am wondering is how can Ryan possibly stand to work for a man who disdains everything that made it possible for him to be a success?

I'd love to hear some journalist ask Ryan that question.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm shocked. SHOCKED! Hypocrisy from Romney? (5+ / 0-)

    Actually, you know what would be shocking?  If someone in the media actually pointed this out to Mitt for a response.

    "Democracy is only real if we all participate" -- Bea Bookler, 94 year-old voter disenfranchised by Voter-ID

    by 8ackgr0und N015e on Wed Sep 19, 2012 at 07:03:05 AM PDT

  •  Although Wikipedia claims he got SS until 18 (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Wee Mama, CajunBoyLgb, sunbro

    I suspect that is a mistake.  Survivor benefits do continue for minor dependents until they are 18 -- UNLESS they go to college.  Then the benefits continue until you are 21 so long as you are a full-time student.  

    The rules have changed since Ryan was collecting survivor benefits from the government, so I don't know what the current status would be today in his situation.

    "Democracy is only real if we all participate" -- Bea Bookler, 94 year-old voter disenfranchised by Voter-ID

    by 8ackgr0und N015e on Wed Sep 19, 2012 at 07:17:03 AM PDT

  •  Can two men share a campaign (0+ / 0-)

    without driving each other crazy?

    -4.75, -5.33 Cheney 10/05/04: "I have not suggested there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11."

    by sunbro on Wed Sep 19, 2012 at 08:58:03 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site