Skip to main content

Former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove is seen at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida August 27, 2012.
2+2 isn't 5, Karl.
Karl Rove is apparently jealous of all the attention Dick Morris has been getting, so he's decided to wield his own special math on the rest of us. From a subscription-only piece at the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he past week's events have not significantly altered the contours of the race.
And right off the bat, you know this is going to be good.
A month ago, Gallup had Mr. Obama at 45% and Mr. Romney at 47%. On Wednesday, Gallup reported 47% for Obama, 46% for Romney. A month ago Rasmussen said it was 45% for Mr. Obama, 43% for Mr. Romney. In its Wednesday poll, Rasmussen reported 46% for Obama, 47% for Romney.
What would Republicans do without the two outlier daily trackers? Because if you look at ALL national polls:
Presidential races can look one way now but much differently on Election Day. In mid-September 1980, President Jimmy Carter led Ronald Reagan 44% to 40% in the Gallup poll. By late October, Reagan had slumped to 39% in Gallup, while Mr. Carter had risen to 47%.
You know who used this argument last? John McCain. And yeah, it's also a stupid argument.
As for the here-and-now, one key number to watch is Mr. Obama's vote share. In the past month, there have been 83 national polls and daily tracking surveys. Mr. Obama reached 50% in just nine and his average was 47%.
Wait, that 50 percent rule applies to incumbent presidents? Because if so, how the heck did Rove's last candidate get reelected?
2004 presidential trendlines show that George W Bush spent the cycle consistently under 50 percent.
That said, it sucks that just nine of the last 83 national polls has Obama over 50, except that the bulk of those plus 50 polls have come within the last week, while the rest are hovering just below that mark! Oh, and Obama's composite total isn't 47 percent, it's over 48 percent (Huffpo, RCP, TPM). Meanwhile, Romney can't get out of the mid-40s.

Anyway, Rove goes on to admit that Romney's campaign faces some "challenges," but ...

Mr. Obama's challenges may be more daunting. His strategy hasn't worked.
If Obama's strategy was to end September getting crushed in all the key battleground states while his favorabilities, job approvals, and Democratic intensity all collapsed, then yes, his strategy looks to be a big failure. But I suspect he had a different strategy.
Team Obama planned to use its big financial edge to bury Mr. Romney under negative ads over the summer. From April 15 to Labor Day, they spent an estimated $215 million on TV. But this was more than offset by conservative groups (principally American Crossroads, which I helped found). While Mr. Obama drained his coffers his own negatives climbed, and Mr. Romney partially repaired his image with voters.
Clever! By making Labor Day the cutoff date, he can include the results of the Republican convention, but can omit the Democratic one. Not that it helps him much. Here are Barack Obama's job approval numbers since April 15:
Remember, Rove claims that Obama's negatives "climbed" between April 15 and Labor Day. You can mouseover the chart above to check for yourself, but here's the data: On April 15, Obama's disapproval was at 48.3 percent. On Labor Day, it was 48.1 percent. So when Rove said they "climbed," he actually meant that he didn't have any clue, but would make shit up for his column because he's Karl "The Math" Rove and he can spout whatever unsupported nonsense he wants. It's a great gig!

And of course, Obama's approval numbers jump big-time after Labor Day, ultimately proving that the hundreds of millions spent by Republicans, including Rove's outfit, were completely pissed away. Remember, the entire reason negative ads exist is to drive up a candidate's negatives, and that simply didn't happen here. Rove wasted his donors' money which is probably why he's trying to cover that up by lying about it.

Mr. Obama needs a different strategy, but his team seems stubbornly focused merely on disqualifying Mitt Romney by whatever argument or means necessary.
Ha ha ha ha! Okay, yeah ...
The campaign's next likely inflection point will be the debates, which start Oct. 3. Both candidates will be under intense pressure. Mr. Romney, a skilled debater, must reassure voters he's up to the job of being president. Fluid and agile, Mr. Obama will be expected to command each encounter. If he doesn't, polls may slowly shift against him.
"May"? Didn't Rove just spend an entire column talking about how Obama is in trouble and is doomed unless he changes his strategy? Now he gets all hedge-y and talks about how Romney "may" gain if he Obama doesn't "command" all the debates (which he'll win anyway)?

This is when Rove should think to himself, "WWDMD"? And what Dick Morris would do is go all in with the crazy. He's already embraced it. Now he just needs to own it. It's not as if the wingnut media circuit will ever penalize him for being wrong.

It hasn't yet.

Originally posted to kos on Thu Sep 20, 2012 at 12:01 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site