Skip to main content

The American Conservative warns that Republicans are in danger of losing the House, based on based on the Princeton Election Consortium's data:

Sam Wang at the Princeton Election Consortium is the first I’ve seen to even discuss the possibility, and he’s not an unbiased source. But he’s got data to back it up.

Using all polls and median-based statistics to address issues of outlier data gives the median of D+4.0% that I gave. That translates to a narrow 16-seat Democratic majority in an election held today. This would be an unusual outcome. It would involve a Democratic net pickup of over 30 seats, much more than the typical gain for a re-elected president’s party. But 2010 was also an exceptional wave year for the Republicans. Again, think of the pendulum. In any event, this is what the numbers are currently telling us.

You should review his data sets, polling numbers, and analysis before jumping in — but then you may feel like jumping off a cliff.

(note: the Princeton link seems to be broken, I will edit if/when it's back up)

And this is what they think of the current crop of House Republicans:

Look, I hold no brief for the current batch of House Republicans, including the sainted Paul Ryan. I believe they are hypocritical, hyper-partisan, and unrealistic. No more self-congratulatory group of people ever existed that had less to congratulate themselves on. I mean, voting to repeal Obamacare thirty times? Was that necessary? Meanwhile, a small task like adopting the recommended reforms to save the Postal Service billions of taxpayer dollars languished in the in-box because closing a post office in Pipsqueak, Georgia, might have offended its total population of three.
So it's wonderful to hear Paul Ryan having to say things like 'we're going to win this thing'. "Win this thing". "Do this thing". "Thing" seems to be an oddly popular phrase of Paul Ryan's.   Knowing that the White House and possibly the Senate are out of reach, Republicans are hunkering down and trying to ensure they retain control of the House. You know their moods (while cheery on the outside) must be very glum indeed on the inside, when they have to reassure themselves in this fashion.

Republican vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan delivered a pep talk to his House colleagues on Thursday, telling them not to be distracted by the daily polls and controversies of the campaign.

Ryan projected optimism in the face of a slew of swing state and national polls showing President Obama leading Mitt Romney by several points. Lawmakers said the Wisconsin Republican made no direct mention of Romney’s comments about the “47 percent” of likely Obama voters, whom he disparaged in a May fundraiser caught in a video that was leaked this week.

"Here's our commitment: We are going to make this about the big things. We need to go on offense and we need to give our constituents the choice of two futures."
"We are going to win this thing,” he said.

Well yes, if by big things you mean destroying Medicare and Social Security. Those are pretty big things.

Ryan spoke for thirty minutes, took no questions, and left to a standing ovation.

“It was all positive,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee.

In Jordan’s critical home state of Ohio, two recent polls have shown Obama leading Romney by seven points. But Jordan said those polls don't reflect what he's seeing on the ground in the state.

“It’s not what you feel. It really isn’t,” Jordan said. “It’s just so different than 2008. You can just sense it.”

Fine, ignore the polls. You're 'feelings' are what matter. Then, close your eyes, click your heels together three times and say "I'm your representative".
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) repeatedly refused to comment directly on Romney’s “47 percent” remarks.

“This election is about jobs. We’ve said this for 20 months, and it hasn’t changed,” Boehner said. “Everybody is going to try to make this election about everything other than what it is. The American people are asking the question, where are the jobs? So the focus is on jobs. The president’s economic policies have failed, and the American people know it.”

Well yes, you've been saying it, that's certain. But Americans know that you and your colleagues have consistently made sure that no jobs legislation could pass the House, in an effort to insure the President's failure.
Boehner was dismissive of commentary that Romney is losing, which he characterized as “political handwringing by Washington insiders trying to make this race look like it’s over for the president who’s going to win.”

He touted Gallup polling that has shown a consistently tight race and a drop-off in Obama’s bounce from the Democratic National Convention.

“This race is far from over, and I’m looking forward to the next 46 days,” Boehner said, before making a quip about his frenetic campaign schedule. “I just hope I survive.”

Sorry John but nothing would make me happier than your not surviving, as Speaker. But he's right about one thing - it's far from over.

Get involved. Help Democratic efforts to regain the House.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site