Skip to main content

I just watched President Clinton's fantastic appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart tonight. I know that at 8:00 in the morning, BruinKid will be posting a complete transcript of the entire episode, so I don't want to duplicate his effort, but I had to share this one little bit.

(Note: I'm republishing this diary because when I first published it, I was under the impression that BruinKid would be doing a transcription of the entire show, and BruinKid informed me in the comments that he doesn't include the interviews. So, I said I would transcribe the interview, which I did. Only I discovered something interesting while doing it. The show I watched on television was an edited version of the interview. There was a lot more interesting stuff that President Clinton had to say about the election and particularly the economy and how to fix it. So, here is my original diary, with the video and transcription of the first part of the interview below the fleur-de-orange.)

Talking about his speech at the Democratic National Convention, President Clinton was explaining what his goal was when writing the speech which was basically to explain to the American people what's been going on without talking down to us, and why President Obama's plan is the right plan for the country. Then he went on to discuss Mitt Romney's plan when Jon Stewart mentioned that Mitt Romney refuses to release any details. President Clinton responded:

If I come to you and I say we have this terrible national debt and here's my opening gambit. First thing I want to do is increase it by $5 trillion over a decade by doing another round of tax cuts that mostly benefit the people we benefited in the last decade, even thought it didn't produce jobs. Now we're in a really deep hole, much bigger than this clock I just showed you. Now let me tell you how we're going to get out of it. Well, what about the details? See me about that after the election.

So I wanted to try to explain that in very simple terms. No one else would do that; no one . Unless you were being driven by ideology instead of by evidence. This is a practical country. We have ideals. We have philosophies. But the problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence. So you have to mold the evidence to get the answer that you've already decided you've got to have. It doesn't work that way. Building an economy; rebuilding an economy is hard, practical nuts and bolts work.

And this is one of Mitt Romney's biggest problems. He made a lot of promises to the Tea Party during the primaries. Now the Tea Party is holding Romney's feet to the fire, demanding that he sticks to those promises on the campaign trail. When Romney said something positive about his own healthcare law in Massachusetts, the Tea Party went nuts. Romney may have planned to use that infamous etch-a-sketch, but the Tea Party is having none of it.

This is the same Tea Party that raged against raising the debt ceiling, thinking that it meant that it would increase the country's debt instead of what holding it up did ... damaged our country's credit rating. The Tea Party ideology does not have any practical application. It does not work. It's just like reading an Ayn Rand novel and trying to make it happen in the real world. It's fiction. But in the Tea Party world, they believe that they can take that work of fiction and make it work in the real world. It doesn't. I wonder if  Sen. Chuck Schumer really believes that the mainstream GOP can take back their party from the Tea Party wing after President Obama is reelected and the GOP also doesn't take control of the Senate. Or was Schumer just having a bit of political fun knowing that the Tea Party has a stranglehold over the GOP and isn't going to let it go?

Update: I went ahead and transcribed the second half of the interview, because it was extremely interesting. Especially the end, where to thunderous applause President Clinton said:

That's what America needs. We need to get the show on the road here and stop all this kind of mindless fact free fighting.
Also, BruinKid's diary with the video and transcript of the opening segment of the show is now available.

President Clinton Interview - Part I (The Economy)

Jon Stewart: Welcome back. My guest tonight: the 42nd President of the United States. His Annual Clinton Global Initiative Meeting kicks off this Sunday, September 23rd, please welcome back to the program, President Bill Clinton.

Thunderous applause as President Clinton walks on stage and shakes hands with Jon Stewart.

Jon Stewart: Take a seat.

President Clinton: Thank you.

Jon Stewart: Let me ask you, so give any good speeches lately (laughter)? How did that feel at the convention? Could you tell that you were crushing it as you were doing it? Could ya; did you feel that?

President Clinton: Yes and no, but I, you know, what I mean by that is I worked so hard on that, for weeks and weeks and weeks. And then the White House designated Bruce Reed, who works for Vice President Biden now, and worked with me for me eight years, and worked with Erskine Bowles on that budget project; to help me. And then Gene Sperling the National Economic Advisor, who also was with me for eight years, came in and we worked the last day and a half after doing all this other work. And I was just determined to get the facts right; and to simplify the argument, without being simplistic. I didn't want to talk down to people. I wanted to explain what I thought was going on.

Jon Stewart: That's what was so stunning, I think. That's why it was such a bracing speech. The phrase you mentioned earlier about getting the facts right. (laughter) The idea that you would use (thunderous applause and laughter) you would use in your argument; I know, this is interesting; that you thought that you would utilize in your argument ... facts (laughter). And they would have; you would attach numbers to them that were real (laughter). I thought it was a bold choice on your part.

President Clinton: Well, you know, we were talking before the show started. I would think; just forget about politics. Just think about any time in your life you've been confused or angry or frightened or resentful or any thing and you didn't know what was going on. In those moments, explanation is way more important than eloquence. And rhetoric falls on deaf ears, so the only chance I had to get anybody to really listen was to say, look here's what I think happened ... boom, boom, boom, boom. And one of my favorite responses came from a guy who said I'm a conservative Republican, and I never voted for Clinton, I never even thought he was eloquent, but he treated me like a grown-up and I appreciated that. I feel like we can sit down and have a conversation now. It's people need to be told. The American people are plenty smart enough to figure this out. But, you know, I have a wife with a traveling job, so I'm home alone a lot (laughter).

Jon Stewart: What does she do? What kind of work is she in? That's interesting (laughter).

President Clinton: It just depends on what day it is.

Jon Stewart: (giggles)

President Clinton: But seriously, and I was president, and I was a governor for 12 years, and I've grappled with all kinds of economic challenges, and I have the time now to spend an hour or two a day to try and work this out, and yeah, you can get all kinds of information off the Internet, but you can't be sure if it's right or not, and there's all these disparate facts out there. So what I tried to do is to organize the information in a way I thought would be most helpful to people, and make the arguments that I believe that persuade me that the course that the President is taking is better than the one advocated by Governor Romney. I just tried to do it in a calm way without calling anybody any names, or getting anybody mad. I thought they'd been a little rough on him about that welfare and Medicare riff they're on so I had a little fun with that but otherwise ... (laughter).

Jon Stewart: But that's what was so … were you surprised because people took to it in a manner as though you had brought high rhetoric from the mountain. It was in its simplicity, I think that is what; it's almost as though you brought something to people and they were eating and they were like, oh my God, this is unreal, I've never had. And you're like, It's pizza. (laughter). Like it was ...

President Clinton: Well ...

Jon Stewart: The simplicity of it. The ability to bring it in that manner, I think is what people found refreshing about it.

President Clinton: First, I think the American people take this election seriously. They know they have to make choices that will affect their lives. And it's not very helpful if you take up there time and you don't explain what those choices are; at least from your point of view. So that's what I tried to do.

Jon Stewart: Are you surprised, though? It has struck me that the Romney campaign has been very clear that they don't want to give the specifics of that choice. They've been given a chance time and time again. Well, what loopholes would you close? Well, I'm going to work that out after I'm elected ...

President Clinton: See me about that afterwards.

Jon Stewart: ... with Congress. Right, see me about it after the election. Surprising a guy of that kind of business experience that you're dealing in, numbers and you would think specifics.

President Clinton: Well, part of the problem that he has is that ..

Jon Stewart: Part of? (laughter)

President Clinton: Yeah, is that he made all these commitments in the primary campaign.

Jon Stewart: Sure.

President Clinton: And you remember, and they just kept pushing everybody to the right. And so it seemed like every other week there was a new challenger coming up and he was playing Whac-a-mole. He had to knock them down. You know. And ...

Jon Stewart: Right. It's very kind of you to even Mole I think is actually ... (laughter)

President Clinton: But, in the course of that he wound up with a lot of commitments, and so, I mean, just think about it. This debt is a terrible problem. He said that. You know they ran that little debt clock up. Well, it will be a problem when interest rates go up if we don't, as I said, if we don't deal with it, it will deal with us, and we won't like it. None of us without regard to party. But if I come to you and I say we have this terrible national debt and here's my opening gambit. First thing I want to do is increase it by $5 trillion over a decade by doing another round of tax cuts that mostly benefit the people we benefited in the last decade, even thought it didn't produce jobs. Now we're in a really deep hole, much bigger than this clock I just showed you. Now let me tell you how we're going to get out of it. Well, what about the details? See me about that after the election.

Jon Stewart: Right.

President Clinton: So I wanted to try to explain that in very simple terms. No one else would do that; no one. Unless you were being driven by ideology instead of by evidence. This is a practical country. We have ideals. We have philosophies. But the problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence. So you have to mold the evidence to get the answer that you've already decided you've got to have. It doesn't work that way. Building an economy; rebuilding an economy is hard, practical nuts and bolts work.

(This is where the first half of the interview about the election was cut during the broadcast. From this point on is what was shown on the web only.)

President Clinton: You have to look at what the competition is doing. You have to look at what the factors resisting growth are. You have to look at the strengths of the country. I tried to talk about that. This country has enormous assets that most of our competitors in the future don't have. We are younger than Europe; we are younger than Japan. And we will be younger than China in 20 years, if we keep ...

Jon Stewart: Is that true?

President Clinton: Absolutely because of their one child policy and because they don't take a lot of immigrants. So if we keep opening the door for young immigrants who want to come here and get an education and work and do things, we're going to be okay. We've got a retirement problem with Social Security and with Medicare.

Jon Stewart: Right.

President Clinton: Because the baby-boomer generation is bigger than our children. But if we get; once you get all of us out of the way (laughter), the population balance is restored and we'll have a much more normal distribution of age and we'll be booming. It's going to be fine.

Jon Stewart: But you continue to make the argument though that we have to do things. That I think has been the whole thing (laughter) that I've been stunned about the Republicans is, you're saying, what we have to do is; there's a plan and we must make a thing, and their whole, seems to be their plan is get government out of the way, and the growth fairies come in (laughter) and they take care of everything and poor people will be magically fed and the market fairy will put something under your pillow and all will be right with the world.

President Clinton: Look, here's the problem with their argument. First of all, the free market is a great economic system. It's moved more people out of poverty in the world in the last 25 years than any 25 year period in history. It's great. All markets, as wel saw; you can go all the way back to the tulip bubble in Holland in the 1600s

Jon Stewart: Don't think I don't.

President Clinton: They all tend to self-destruct. So after the depression, we figured out at least how to stop that. And in the last four months of President Bush's term, and the first four or five months of President Obama's term, everybody was all hands on deck and they did a lot of things, including the unpopular TARP bill to keep us from falling into a depression. By the way, you have gotten the TARP money back plus a profit. Taxpayers have actually been repaid plus a profit. And then, the question is, all this damage has been done to the economy. You got all these hard working people, millions of them, at one time more than 15 million, who never missed a mortgage payment, didn't take out a bogus mortgage, and their house is still worth less than their mortgage. What are they going to do? How are you going to do this? You have all these financial institutions that are wondering if they should start loaning money again. And where's the money? How do you get it back into investment? How do you create jobs?

Jon Stewart: And government is the only power that can fill that vacuum to some extent.

President Clinton: And that's why the ... when things are normal, you can have this anti-government rant and it has no practical, or the practical consequences are not as great.

Jon Stewart: Right.

President Clinton: You know, one party cuts taxes more and spends less on education. It's, you know, you can argue who's right. When people are flat on their back, and there's zero inflation and zero interest rates. We can borrow money right now for less than the rate of inflation. You can actually borrow; the U.S. Government could borrow a trillion dollars for a year at a quarter of one percent interest because people trust us. They think our economy's strong and they will pay us almost to keep their money. When interest rates start up again, it's a different story. You've got to have that debt coming down. But here's the point I want to make. There's no example on our planet of a successful country if you define successful as high per capita income, low unemployment, rising incomes, and good social mobility. That means if you work hard and you do better, you've got a chance to get a raise. And you got a chance to do better than your parents did. Every country's that doing that has a strong private sector, and a strong government and they work together to grow the economy and create opportunity; each doing what they do best. There is no example of this picture that is being painted on the other side of the aisle. And Republicans didn't use to paint that picture. I mean, you know ...

Jon Stewart: Nixon would be considered a communist today.

President Clinton: Yeah, he would.

Jon Stewart: It used to be, it wasn't about freedom vs. socialism. But we've got to go commercial.

President Clinton: Dangerous lefty.

Jon Stewart: When we come back, we're going to talk about the Clinton Global Initiative.

President Clinton: Good.

Jon Stewart: We're going to see what's going on with that.

President Clinton Interview - Part II (Clinton Global Initiative)

Jon Stewart: Welcome back. We're here with former President Bill Clinton (thunderous applause). Now you are starting up, it's the Clinton Global Initiative. This is; how many years is this now?

President Clinton: Eight.

Jon Stewart: Eight years. here's what's going to be ... you're going to be there. President Obama's going to be there. Mitt Romney's going to be there. Condoleezza Rice is going to be there. Egyptian President Mohammed Mursi is going to be there. How do you get these people? What kind of food do you serve? (laughter) How do you get a group like this together in cooperation to move forward? What's the pitch?

President Clinton: One other thing. The leader of Libya is going to be there and the American people will hear from him that he really liked the American Ambassador who was killed. And that they tried to save his life, and that he wants America to stay there. So there are a lot of interesting things. But, we started doing this; they come because it's at the opening of the U.N. A lot of them are going to be in New York. We invite them all to come. We invite many of them to participate. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the Nobel Prize winning President of Liberia is a good friend of mine. She's been to a lot of our programs. A lot of these people come year in, year out. The Secretary General of the U.N., and the president of the World Bank Dr. Jim [Yong] Kim, and the president of Wal-Mart is going to be there at the opening (laughter) to talk about; here's why it's important ...

Jon Stewart: Does he greet people as they walk in? (laughter)

President Clinton: No, he hires unemployed senior citizens like me to do that. (laughter)

Jon Stewart: All right. Fair enough. (laughter) That'll work. I knew it was something like that.

President Clinton: But look, here's why he's coming. And I got him to change his schedule to come for this reason. Wal-Mart has deployed more photovoltaics on their buildings than any other company in America. They're the number one solar company in America now. And they also run some of their buildings with wind energy. And they have also cut their packaging; they're great on it. And I want him to describe what I'm trying to get people to think about, which is, most people make money and then decide, I want to do something good. That's a noble and good thing. They have decided instead to go back to square one and say, what good to we want? We want to avoid the worse consequences of global warming. We want to cut our energy bill. We want to make it more predicable over the long rung. How should we design our stores? How should we design our truck routes? How should we design the way we package our products from the beginning to get where we want to do in the end? We're trying to get people to think about instead of fixing things when we get comfortable, how can we all at every income level; we're also flying non-governmental groups in from some of the poorest countries in the world to be a part of this debate. How do you have the maximum impact by thinking more about it in the beginning how you're going to do something in the first place? That's what we're focusing on this year. And it's really quite exciting.

Jon Stewart: But it's even; it is at the nexus of what the future of the partnership between government and NGOs and private industry will be and it's what we were talking about earlier. This idea that these are not antagonistic forces; then can sometimes be countervailing forces but they must at some level be symbiotic. They must at some level work together.

President Clinton: Yeah, let me give you an example of the places in America doing well. Anybody from San Diego? San Diego is viewed as you know (laughter) ... oh, there you are ... of one of our, you know, our great naval city. And it still is. But it is also the center of human genome research in America. Private sector Craig Venter was in a race in effect with international government consortium to sequence the genome in 2000; started with a bipartisan commitment to federal research at the end of President Bush's term. Then I put three billion dollars of your money in it.

Jon Stewart: Mine? (laughter)

President Clinton: Your ... (inaudible because laughter drowned out word). And it's already; I was at St Jude's Children's Hospital in Memphis just about three weeks ago looking a children whose lives have been saved because we now can see how their difference in; the genetic differences require different medicines to cure the same kind of cancer. It was unbelievable. Okay, so you've got Venter's Foundation. It's an NGO. Then you've got the University of California at San Diego putting out all these scientists. You have the Republican mayor of San Diego inviting people in and the biggest computer company, Qualcomm, headed by a Democrat Irwin Jacobs; he's a friend of mine. And they have spawned 700 more computer companies in San Diego. Why? Because you have the government, the non-profit sector, and the business sector working together to do this. Orlando has 100 computer simulation companies. Why? Disney World. Universal Theme Park. They need those computer simulators. The Global Entertainment Arts Video Game division; anybody that's ever been like me hooked on a video game knows that you have to have good simulation to keep yourself in a constant state of anxiety. Like (gestures with hands like playing video game; laughter). And ... wait a minute (laughter) ... and the defense department and NASA, and they all put money in there together, and the University of Central Florida has 53,000 students ... they feed them in. Why are they doing that? Because when they work together, they are so much more powerful than when they sit around and fight all the time. What's the result? A hundred new computer simulation companies. That's what's working in America today. That's what we have to do on a national level.

Jon Stewart: It's ... you're like the world's central schmoozer. (laughter) What you do is you go to those guys; you go oh you're doing that? You know, I happen to have a country over hear that's actually working ... Oh, Kenya. You want to come here for a second? I want you to meet somebody and you bring them together and they all realize, oh this is common purpose and we can move towards a certain goal. And it makes it seem simple and it drives you crazy when ...

President Clinton: Look, one of the companies involved in the biggest solar project in America now on the Nevada/California border also helped to finance the biggest solar building in the Caribbean, a teaching hospital at Mirebalais, Haiti, The poorest country in the Caribbean. Built by Dr. Paul Farmer, whom you know is Partner in Health. They have 1800 solar panels. They generate so much power, they run the hospital and they feed extra power into the grid in a country where 85% of the people don't have electricity, that's a very big deal. We did that by getting every body to work together. What do you know? What are your resources? What can you do? Look. This economics is not ideology. It's hard work. And it's seeing what the competition's doing, and it's analyzing alternatives,

Jon Stewart: Results oriented. Merit ...

President Clinton: and keeping score.

Jon Stewart: It's amazing.

President Clinton: That's what America needs. We need to get the show on the road here and stop all this kind of mindless fact free fighting. (Thunderous applause)

Jon Stewart: Ladies and gentlemen, President Bill Clinton. We'll be right back.

Originally posted to hungrycoyote on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 03:28 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Video is (5+ / 0-)

    The ...Bushies... don't make policies to deal with problems. ...It's all about how can we spin what's happening out there to do what we want to do. Krugman

    by mikepridmore on Thu Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:33 PM PDT

  •  this is something Bill Clinton does... (8+ / 0-)

    ... exceptionally well:  Answers the "how?" question in a way that almost anyone can understand.  

    Obama's at his best answering the "what?" and especially the "why?" question in a way that is not only contagiously inspiring but also builds a strong sense of confidence that it's the right way forward.

    The combination of Clinton and Obama is really really effective.  

    So I wonder about this:   What if any constitutional limits are there on serving as VP?  And what about doing some kind of mashup between Bill Clinton, Obama, and HRC, where for example HRC runs for President in 2016, and has Bill Clinton and Obama in her administration, either one as VP and the other in some senior cabinet position?  

    Understood there might be some social psychology issues about a former president serving in a subordinate position in another administration.  

    But the three of them together in any administration in any combination, over a period of let's say 16 years from 2008 through 2024, would be an unstoppable force for bringing back everything we lost in the last 30 years, and making real forward progress on a number of things we are still looking forward to.  

    OK, someone in that mix is going to be at an age where they probably really really want to retire from politics.  But we have Supreme Court Justices in their 80s who are still capable (whether we agree with them or not is another question).  

    And for that matter, why not Supreme Court appointments for one or more of this group?  

    Really: this is a powerful combination, and if there's any way we can keep the three of 'em in some kind of high office for as long as possible, we should look at the options seriously.  

    "Minus two votes for the Democrat" equals "plus one vote for the Republican." Arithmetic doesn't care about your feelings.

    by G2geek on Thu Sep 20, 2012 at 11:57:00 PM PDT

    •  I think keeping them in office much longer (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      G2geek, hungrycoyote, elwior, shaharazade

      would get stale fast. Think of media attention spans and media fads.

      In 2008 people were already arguing that 28 years of Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton would be grotesque. And it would have been.

      "I was a big supporter of waterboarding" - Dick Cheney 2/14/10

      by Bob Love on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 12:33:35 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  And yet, think that we're going to see (4+ / 0-)

        a Jeb Bush campaign in 2016. Actually, it was the sign The Daily Show used to describe the RNC ... The Road to Jeb in 2016, or something like that.

        “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

        by hungrycoyote on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 02:11:10 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  wonderful!, let's have at it! (4+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          hungrycoyote, elwior, Bob Love, Olympia

          Sheesh, they're making it easy for us!

          That said, no doubt he feels burned by his bro's misadventures in office, so if nothing else he'd be under major pressure to be a real middle-of-the-roader and cooperate with both sides of the aisle.  

          Bottom line is, no matter who they put up in 2016, we need someone who is a slam-dunk winner to keep things moving forward.  

          "Minus two votes for the Democrat" equals "plus one vote for the Republican." Arithmetic doesn't care about your feelings.

          by G2geek on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 03:00:26 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  The thing I'm always reminded of when (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Cedwyn, Bob Love, G2geek

            people talk about Jeb Bush running for president is when he left the Governor's office here in Florida. People talked about how President Bush, the father, teared up. Some speculated it was because he thought Jeb should have been President, and George screwed things up so bad, that nobody would ever trust the younger son in the White House. I do believe that Jeb is the more intelligent of the brothers, but I still wouldn't trust him with the presidency. Not after he interjected himself in the whole Terri Schiavo controversy here in Florida before it went national.

            “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

            by hungrycoyote on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 04:03:05 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

          •  If Jeb runs wouldn't you just love to see (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            Hillary run against him.  I know she has said no, but she has been so great as SOS and Bill has come on strong lately.  Boy could those two take a big bit of little Jebbie (he who has no big boy pants) and Bush I and Bush II have been so disgraced they couldn't open their mouths to defend/support him.

    •  I know, after Part 2 last nite, I say amend (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VBeach Dem, Spanky, hungrycoyote, DSPS owl

      the constitution and let Clinton back in.

      What a great story about Walmart, San Diego and Orlando.  Now, I have no love for Walmart, but I will give them their due and was very impressed that they are the largest corporate user of solar panels in the US. Publicizing this, driving home the point that green energy is just good business is huge.  

      Then San Diego - what a great story.  Government investment in the human genome project, an NGO, universities, Republican mayor, Democratic CEO of Qualcomm all come together and spawn 700 companies, thousands of jobs and come up with medical technology that is curing our children of terrible diseases.

      The project in Haiti, the development with Disney.  

      Truly, I was ready to cry - why don't we hear about this from Obama? from Romney?

      Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear. ~William E. Gladstone, 1866

      by absdoggy on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 07:32:53 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Interesting... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungrycoyote, The Walrus, palantir

    because there's a ton of ideology here... and not much facing up to reality.

    "A civilization which does not provide young people with a way to earn a living is pretty poor". Eleanor Roosevelt

    by Superpole on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 04:06:51 AM PDT

  •  I heard President Clinton (12+ / 0-)

    make a similar comment several years ago, when I had just got'en out of College

    and not to sound too melodramatic, it truly changed my whole view of politics, and political thinking  

    Bill Clinton was talking to a group of young people, and someone asked him which ideology is better, and the former President responded;

    You shouldn't let any ideology govern your views, because they  limit the debate in the country, if you think you've already got the answers, there is no point to debating at all.

    It limits your own ability to think, to debate facts in your own mind.

    Coming out of Business School, I thought I was pretty conservative, but I thought alot about what Clinton said and I've always tried to let facts dictate my views. I think that's a big reason why I'm not conservative today  

  •  The Right has no answer (8+ / 0-)

    to Clinton. President Obama is personally liked and the GOP ticket is disliked. That combiantion out on the campaign trail is something the GOP simply cannot counter.

    The DNC did such a masterful job of weaving a narrative and they have been able to continue with it. Even using Romney's continued problems into that narrative. Now add in how a 'successful' business man has a campaign that is almost out of money. Classic.

    The Spice must Flow!

    by Texdude50 on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 04:27:04 AM PDT

    •  Yeah, that diary yesterday blew my mind. (4+ / 0-)

      I had even written a diary a few days ago about how Romney was going to fundraisers instead of campaigning ... it never even occurred to me that it was because he didn't have the money. That diary just blew my mind.

      What a train wreck. I responded to a political email from my father in June saying that Romney was a train wreck of a candidate with no charisma. In my wildest imagination I didn't think it was going to turn into this bad a campaign.

      I think it may be time to start concentrating on the Senate and House races.

      “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

      by hungrycoyote on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 04:39:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The key to this comment (& the prior one) (6+ / 0-)

      is about WHY Clinton (and Obama) are liked, and why the GOP (not just their current presidential ticket, but the majority of the party) is disliked by a majority of Americans. And the answer to that also explains why movement conservatism is so inept at solving problems.

      Obama and Clinton appeal to our better angels. They can empathize with and relate to those at the bottom of the economic ladder. When Clinton, during one of the debates in his run for president, told a woman "I feel your pain," everyone watching could tell he meant it. That's what makes a true leader.

      The problem with the modern conservative movement is NOT that it is fact-averse - it has to be so to have any hope of gaining traction with the masses - the problem is that it is empathy-averse. It's about selfishness and greed. W Bush was just as big of a self-entitled prick as Mitt Romney is. But he was able to hide it. Mitt's not. So more and more people are finally starting to see what movement conservatism is really all about, and most don't like it.

      I vote we run Rick Scott out of Florida on a high-speed rail.

      by ObamOcala on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 04:40:12 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I hadn't really thought about it that way (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Texdude50, palantir, Deep Texan

        before, and I think you're absolutely right. Romney sure can't hide the fact that he has absolutely no clue. He's never experienced any of things most Americans have. He's so arrogant. It's really kind of a blessing in disguise because it's causing people to look more closely at other Republicans as well.

        I was half listening to an interview on Ed Schultz last night with an Hispanic woman. I missed the beginning but I caught the part about how Romney went on Univision and used the term "illegal alien" instead of "undocumented immigrant." He absolutely had no clue.

        Are you still working at The Villages? I still remember that diary you wrote about the letter from your boss. Any idea if he managed to raise much in donations for Romney? I understand Romney's campaign doesn't have the hoards of cash they lead us to believe they have.

        “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

        by hungrycoyote on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 04:54:19 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Still working at The Villages... (0+ / 0-)

 idea how much Gary Morse raised for Romney. I'm sure he'll stick with Mitt until the end - also wouldn't be surprised if he was in the room in Boca when Mitt made the 47% comment.

          I vote we run Rick Scott out of Florida on a high-speed rail.

          by ObamOcala on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 07:39:42 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  thankyou coyote (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungrycoyote, palantir, Spanky

    for your effort in providing us with the transcript. You know even reading Clinton is still amazingly interesting. Usually much is lost when the visuals are gone.

    music- the universal language

    by daveygodigaditch on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 05:06:46 AM PDT

  •  "Ideology" Is Far Too Soft a Term For It. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungrycoyote, shaharazade, efrenzy

    They're overthrowing the government. Look the voter disenfranchisement strikes down the opening clause of the Constitution, "We, the people." They intend to end promotion of the general welfare which goes back into our first administrations.

    You could say that an invading army is "ideological" in that it looks to the solution of conquest before looking at data, but the only data that matters in that context is that there's a nation vulnerable to be taken.

    This isn't an invasion but it is a conquest, and so all that data the Democrats are analyzing is moot to the conservative revolution.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 06:04:32 AM PDT

  •  I hated Clinton back in the day (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MKDAWUSS, hungrycoyote

    But I was just a wee teenager who had just finished reading The Way Things Ought to be by Rush Limbaugh :)

    I grew out of that phase, of course.  I can't say that I've become a liberal socialist in the past 5 years, my worldview has been and always shall be small-c conservatism of the Burkean tradition.  I'm ambivalent to change for it's own sake (my main gaming machine is a Commodore 64 to this day) and I like to make a case that there should be a countervailing argument to any proposals that have significant social and economic impact, if they are implemented.

    The highly vitriolic and emotional talk of "death panels" bordered on the ridiculous.  Never mind that Obama only had enough legislative support to pass the 1990s version of Republican health care reform (with no Republican votes in the Senate, quite ironically).  Mitt Romney is not even allowed to say he supports helping those with pre-existing conditions without the crazy contingent frothing at the mouth.

    But I digress.  I kind of like Bill Clinton now.  He was certainly a worthy adversary back in the day.  I would certainly enjoy debating him on economics on some of his finer points, if I ever had the chance.

  •  Billy C is a boss. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungrycoyote, Olympia

    POTUS 42 explains generally comlex shit to the masses like no other; makes 44 look like a weird robot in regards to public speaking.

  •  that man should be more vocal (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungrycoyote, DSPS owl, Olympia

    Obama should setup a committee to look at all this and ask Bill Clinton to head it.

    -You want to change the system, run for office.

    by Deep Texan on Fri Sep 21, 2012 at 09:51:14 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site