In all the complicated theorizing going on about the potential landmines that could possibly litter Mittens's tax returns from years gone by, I have not seem anyone posit what might be two completely simple, yet potential campaign-destroying reasons why we are never going to see his financial disclosures from the past 12 years - and most especially, from the period from 2008 - 2010.
My theory after the orange California freeway interchange.......
Here - in a nutshell, is my theory on the reason we are never going to see Mittens' financial information - especially that from 2008 - 2010:
THEORY: Mitt's income was substantially LOWER beginning in 2008 but was geometrically HIGHER beginning in 2009 and steadily rising every year subsequent - thereby completely undercutting the argument that "We are worse off than we were 4 years ago."Just a simple thought in a sea of convuluted theories with little or no evidence. :D
Such an admission would permit production of possibly the most devastating campaign ad of all time, with Obama being able to detail the growth in Mitt's income (and his paying, somehow, lower taxes than everyone else) with the tag line: Who's better off today than they were 4 years ago? MITT ROMNEY!