Skip to main content

There is an episode in the classic Twilight Zone series which, I believe, is relevant to the contemporary political landscape.

In this episode, an Air Force test pilot suffering from amnesia wanders through a town empty of people. He enters a gas station, a police station, and a diner finding all the common accoutrements of life, but without the people that give the inanimate objects meaning and purpose. Gradually, his temperament evolved from confusion to frustration to anger to disconsolate weeping.

Physically, he never changed from the man that first entered the town, but on a mental level he underwent a dramatic shift. He was the same. The town was the same as any other American town. The only aspect not the same was the absence of people. This absence was so abnormal that the character just wanted out, to awake from the nightmare and live in a normal world filled with the living.

And, that is the most basic psychological fact:  people need people. Humanity, as a species, needs social contact in order to function properly. Without each other life does not hold meaning or purpose. Much as the insentient needs the sentient to give it meaning and purpose, so does the sentient need each other. Societal relationships are the heart of the human experience.

Community.

A community can be defined as a unified body of individuals; united in meaning and purpose, and sharing common values. We are not detached entities buzzing in our own separate vacuums, but are beings sharing a common space with other beings. Our words and actions influence each other, to the point that groups of individuals united in a common cause, or working towards a common goal, may generate a commonly shared feeling, or understanding, they will achieve their goal, no matter the obstacle. This is collective efficacy and it is a positive psychological development. Just ask any sports team or military unit.

This collective idea that unites humanity can also be seen in the realm of thought, or our very understanding of existence. There are three levels of the human mind:  the conscious, subconscious, and unconscious. Carl Jung noted that the level of the unconscious could even be further subdivided into the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious. In the collective unconscious the shared experiences of the human and pre-human species are collectively stored. These experiences are universal and contain the totality of our ancestral experiences. This concept eventually leads to the archetypes and comparative mythology of Joseph Campbell, where all humanity shares the same psychological myths imprinted upon their genetic code through the process of evolution.

We share goals. We share human experience. We share each other. We are all linked.

Community.

This leads to the contemporary political landscape and the philosophical argument being waged between Republicans and Democrats about the nature of humanity and the importance of social relationships. The following video that aired at the Democratic National Convention was widely lampooned by Republicans:

The point of contention concerned the statement, “The government is the only thing we all belong to.” Republicans, and Fox News, used the statement to insinuate Democrats believed we belong to the government as articles of property or as a commodity. This is counterintuitive as just a few moments before the same video stated, “We do believe you can use government in a good way.” Slaves cannot USE their master. The reasonable conclusion is that Democrats believe in the common belief of all Americans:  that we use the government as we would any other social club, whether to better the shared human experience or, returning to the concept of collective efficacy, to attain a common goal.

There are many definitions to the term “belong.” Republicans used the one most advantageous to their criticism, ignoring the context of the video which is contrary to their argument. If one listens to the entire video, especially the statement of citizens using the government in a good way, then the term “belong” simply means being a member of a social club or other organization. If my son becomes a member of the Boy Scouts, I do not weep, wail, and gnash my teeth at the thought of the organization owning my child, but that he is simply a member, one of many, belonging to an organization that he can use to better himself or his immediate environment.

Congressman Paul Ryan argued that when he gave his oath upon obtaining congressional office, he swore his service not to the government, but to the People. When deconstructing the statements of the DNC video it would appear that Congressman Ryan, unwittingly, is in agreement. There is a reciprocal relationship between the People and the government, where the latter is a social construct created by the former, and which the former, by their very membership, are the latter.

This can be explained another way. When we are born in the United States, we automatically become citizens of this nation. We are members of this nation. The nation does not own us. We own it by our very membership because we are the United States. The United States would not exist without our membership. In much the same way, the government would not exist without our membership or consent to exist.

This is the basis of the social contract.

In the beginning, humanity existed within the natural world acting as hyperindividuals, free of all social constructs or responsibilities. Whether one looks at the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke (a favorite of conservatives), or Jean-Jacques Rousseau, this natural state of humanity did not work. Humanity acting only within their own self-interest precipitated the necessity of the creation of government as a mechanism of safety and security. By shared agreement, humanity willingly relinquished some of their freedom in order to create an agency to protect their basic rights. There is even an escape clause written into the social contract that states, if the government acts in a tyrannical manner, not living up to its stated responsibility to its creators, then it may be disbanded and reformed. A return to the natural world is not possible as we are unable to live in such a state in harmony. The government is necessary.

This is simple common sense.

There is an important philosophical argument at play in the upcoming presidential election. It involves arguing whether humanity exists as hyperindividuals or collective members of the same shared community and human experience.

Hyperindividualism is a sociological term defined as “the tendency for people to act in a highly individual way, without regard to human society.” When we consider the current Republican platform to be based upon hyperindividualism, it must be noted they do not do this consistently. It is more of an economic hyperindividualism, whereas on a social or personal level they advocate a theocratic model. There is almost a sociopathic tendency within hyperindividualism, and it is a philosophy running counter to the human condition, especially when seen in the light of Locke or Rousseau.

Social constructs are necessary. The government is necessary. We all belong to these organizations, but they are owned by us. The creation cannot own the creator. It is a fallacy to believe this to be the case.

Rousseau wrote, “Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will; and in a body we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole.” The general will is our will and it acts in our best interest because it is humanity which is the primary agent. We need each other and we need the constructs we created to maintain security and harmony in our lives.

Secretary of State Clinton was correct all those years ago when she wrote It Takes a Village. It truly does, otherwise we would just be lonely souls pressing the panic button.

Cross-posted at Salon Jacobin.

Originally posted to Salon Jacobin on Sun Sep 23, 2012 at 09:11 AM PDT.

Also republished by Headwaters.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  "This is simple common sense." (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Todd Hancock, marykk

    I couldn't agree more.

    I mentioned this in another diary. When people rail against the government, they are essentially complaining about their own failure. WE are the government.

    If you insist on being passive and just watching it happen, of COURSE the government is going to fail you. It is simple. Participate or lose.

    The reason most of us are on the losing end is because most of us don't participate.

    Which leads me to a story I've been thinking about writing about. There's this woman, a meth addict, who's left all of her children to be cared for by someone else. Hasn't seen her kids in months.

    But she's at this meth house and there's a little boy, the son of one of her meth buddies, and he slices his hand open trying to make himself something to eat. No one really notices. No one really cares.

    But she finally sees him and his wounded hand and takes him into the bathroom and cleans him up, bandages the wound. It's the first time anyone has touched him or talked to him in ages.

    So every day after that, the kid cuts himself, then stands in front of her and shows it to her so she'll take care of him.

    I have been haunted by this story for years. The boy is a young teen now. I don't know where he is or if he's being cared for.

    But he is MY responsibility. He belongs to all of us. He is growing up in a world where no one cares about him, where his basic needs aren't being met, and he's going to enter adulthood lacking every basic building block that you and I and most others have.

    I'm not better off if no one is there to help him. None of us are better off if he's on his own.

    And that's why I'm a Democrat. I care about this kid I've never met. I care that our society takes care of him.

    P.S. I am not a crackpot.

    by BoiseBlue on Sun Sep 23, 2012 at 09:27:31 AM PDT

  •  Thank you for this post! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Todd Hancock

    Your sentiment rings so true. I personally know so many people in our country that are afraid right now, financially and emotionally drained, do not have a conduit of change or support that they trust, and feel powerless to change their situation. In my own life, the most empowering thing I know to do when this hopelessness is upon me is to reach out and help another. With anything! As I tell my conservative friends particularly - Asserting my utility increases my own self-worth, energy, and faith in agents of change and humanity, while also helping/respecting another. It just feels good!
    Thank you for the reminder to all of us. We could all do more each day to foster a sense of community and bridge the gap in which hatred and injustice grows.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site