Skip to main content

Paul Krugman just reflected something that I've been wondering about, and that also has me very concerned.  We are very disgusted with the open and unapologetic extremeness of the Republican lies that flow from Romney and throughout the Republican party.  It's sad that we've lost the journalistic aggressiveness of the past that would normally expose and ridicule such lies, and that we are now left with, report whatever they say and find an equivalent case from the other side.

The question is, why do they lie so much?  Well, it's because they've got nothing!  The Republican core beliefs have degenerated, because of the likes of crazy Tea Partiers and greedy Oligarchs, into a mishmash of impossible economic "arithmetic" and mean spirited social policies that would scare the hell out of most Americans if they truly understood what they were proposing.

We like to blame Romney's campaign staff for running such an inept campaign, which he most certainly is, but almost every Republican running for office is running a similar campaign of nonsense economic policies and mean spirited social proposals, completely hidden with lies and deception intended to manipulate an uninformed public and appeal to the most negative human emotions.

Here's how Paul Krugmans blog entitled sympathy for the doofus puts it, below the fold.

What, after all, does Romney have to run on? True, he hasn’t offered specifics on his economic policies — but that’s because he can’t. The party base demands tax cuts, but also demands that he pose as a deficit hawk; he can’t do both in any coherent fashion without savaging Medicare and Social Security, yet he’s actually trying to run on the claim that Obama is the threat to Medicare. On fiscal matters, doubletalk and obfuscation are his only options.

And no, Paul Ryan didn’t show that it can be done differently. His plan was, as I’ve documented many times, a fraud. Furthermore, he’s basically a Beltway creation; the Ryan legend was based on the desire of Washington type to anoint a Serious, Honest Conservative; expose him to the wider scene, and it all falls apart.

It is absolutely crazy to accept multiple opposing ideas at the same time, and yet that precisely defines the Republican party's economic plan.  Accompany this with a war on everyone who isn't a rich white male, and you've got a great plan to become a minor party in America's political system.  They have only one campaign strategy, lie your ass off and hope they buy into it!

But here's where my concerns are.  They were able to convince the public and their own party that George Bush wasn't a true conservative!  How is that possible?  George Bush gave the conservatives virtually everything they wanted, from tax cuts, to a crazy Supreme Court, to 2 wars, to banning stem cell research...  And I think we may have helped shift the blame of what was happening from the policies of George Bush to the ineptness of George Bush.

So now after Mitt Romney caved in and picked Paul Ryan, the conservative dream boy they were demanding, the conservatives are turning on Romney.  They know he's on a losing path, and they're getting ready to blame his loss on his incompetent campaign rather than his Medicare proposals, or his tax cuts for the rich proposals, or his slashing government to the bone proposals...  Even Cokie Roberts is saying the conservatives are getting ready to blame Romney's incompetent campaign.

We Democrats like to blame Romney's weirdness and his inability to remotely relate to normal human beings for his failing campaign.  That may be true, but we repeat the mistake of blaming the man rather than the policies.  There are a thousand Mitt Romney's and Paul Ryans waiting in the wings to run the next campaign of lies and deception.  It's only a matter of time before a demagogue with charisma overcomes the blunders of a Romney or Bush.  And as Bush demonstrated, it doesn't take a lot of charisma for a campaign of lies to fool the public into believing you'll fight for them.

If we make the conservative policies the reason for their failed campaigns, and loosen up a bit on the personal attacks of the candidates, we just might convince the public that it is conservatism itself that is the reason to reject the Republican party, and not the inept candidates.  The public needs to understand that if candidates declare themselves to be conservative, they are a representative of the Oligarchy, will run a deceptive and dishonest campaign, and are a direct threat to the 99%, no matter who the candidate is.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The "Mitt's fault," "Not a REAL conservative" (5+ / 0-)

    fest is going to happen no matter how we frame our messages. It is utterly essential to the survival of the brand.

    Though I agree with expanding the attack from "Romney's nuts" to "Republicans' ideas just don't work" to maximize down-ballot gains, nothing we say is going to stop the "Mitt failed conservatism" excuses.

    We've been wondering how to get through the clutter and reach low-information voters. Mitt haz it.

    by Crashing Vor on Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 10:55:31 AM PDT

  •  Because Ours is Also a Conservative Party and It (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    pollwatcher, AuroraDawn, denise b

    doesn't want to attack conservative policy fundamentally, only extremes pushed by Republicans.

    So the personal attacks when possible are ideal, they allow Democrats to fight hard without promising anything concrete and annoying to the big donor class.

    That's something we need to get into after the election.

    As for the media, well they're corporations Constitutionally free to promote their agenda, and with the gusher of new political advertising they're not going to risk corporate sponsorship money by doing thorough journalistic reporting on big business and its party. Necessarily the press must be the organ of the rich and business.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 11:02:49 AM PDT

  •  Candidates are inept because they are conservative (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Supply side tax cuts are inept policy.  That's why candidates who support them turn out to be inept office holders when they are voted in.  

    When you point out that conservative policies are three scoops of stupid, they respond by "yes, but a fourth scoop of stupid will fix everything!"  They so much want their policies to work, and they believe in them wholeheartedly, but the facts say different: they are inept and more servings of stupid don't improve things.  

    Our leaders are too far removed from the pressures of evolution.  When policies are shown to be failures, leaders should be fed to packs of ravenous baboons.  I think when Condi Rice testified that "nobody could have predicted....", the chairman should have just opened the trapdoor to the baboon pit and called for the next witness.

  •  No matter what happens (0+ / 0-)

    or who they run, the conservatives will continue to blame the failure of their policies on poor execution rather than the inherent flaws in those policies.  "We just didn't do it hard enough or far enough" or something...

    -7.62, -7.28 "Hold fast to dreams, for if dreams die, life is a broken winged bird that cannot fly." -Langston Hughes

    by luckylizard on Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 03:03:52 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site