Skip to main content

It's easy to be almost awed that so many people will be voting against themselves in November.

In the current presidential race it's important to note that half of likely Republican voters will not be voting for Mitt Romney.

Thomas Franks, in his book What's The Matter With Kansas?. deduced that Kansans were voting against their own economic interested because Republican politicians had distracted them with "cultural issues" . That's still a useful tactic for Republican leaders.

I'd say about 47% of the 47% who will be voting for Mitt Romney will not be voting for Romney – they will be voting against Barak Obama. And there's a reason.

Almost none of the Republicans I speak with are enthusiastic Romney supporters. A minority seem to be at first, but it quickly turns out that their enthusiasm is actually for someone who is running against Obama. It could just as well be Newt Gingrich or Elmer Fudd (if that isn't redundant).

Like all Republican candidates in the last thirty-five years, Romney is a terrible candidate, and his running mate Paul Ryan has become a laughingstock in both economic and political circles. Republicans simply don't have anyone to run for president who isn't a terrible candidate, and the reasons bundle neatly with their core problem, which is that the people behind the Republican party, the elite 1%, are feeling their oats.

It's fairly obvious, but I think this is what happened, and what's playing out in the 2012 elections. The numbers are interesting...

The 1% began to be deified in the 1980s under Reagan Republicans. The mass media did it for entertainment value, focusing on their wealth but never probing deeply into the people themselves; it was all about their possessions. The 1% enjoyed being admired and encouraged it. A group of people (think Karl Rove, Phil Gramm, Grover Norquist, etc.) saw an opportunity to get some of the excess money belonging to the 1% (and at that level almost all their money is excess).

The power behind the Republican party, the 1%, were encouraged to believe that they should run things ("things" being everything). They began a thirty-five year trek to where we are today.

The biggest obstacle was always democracy. That pesky feature of America meant that 99% of the public would be voting for their own self-interest, and that self-interest was opposed to the self-interest of the 1%.

Their solution was to buy middlemen/salesmen, paying some of them enough so that the salesmen became part of the 1% and then were propagandizing for their own self-interest. The list of salespeople for the 1% is very, very long. Here are some examples…

The median American household income in about $50,000 a year.

Some spokespeople for the 1% masquerading as spokespeople for the Middle-Class:

Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and other "regular contributors" (they don't have their own shows) to Fox News are paid about a million dollars a year. Not to do a regular job, but simply to be guests on scheduled shows. These folks attempt to persuade the middle-class viewers to support the agenda of the 1%. Their income just from being Fox guests ($1,000,000 per annum) would take twenty years of actual work – half the expected work life – of the middle-class families they're hired to trick.

Roger Ailes, the head of Fox News, makes $21,000,000 a year. His contract is running out and he's negotiating for a raise to $30,000,000. Even at twenty-one million, though, the average American family would have to work for 420 years to make what he gets in a year. With the raise it would be 600 years.

Bill O'Reilly gets about $32,000,000 a year to convince the middle-class to support the agenda of the 1%. The middle-class family would have to work 640 years to make what he gets in a single year. Six and a half centuries.

Another salesman for the 1%, Rush Limbaugh, got $69,000,000 last year. That's more than a quarter of a million collars an hour as a spokesman for the 1%. (Again, over a quarter of a million dollars…….an hour.) His victims would have to work 1,380 YEARS to make what he is paid in ONE year.

The King of Cons, Glenn Beck received $80,000,000 last year to spread terror among The Gullibles at the behest of the 1%. How long would the average American household have to work to make his twelve month income? One thousand, six hundred years!

Who gives these salesmen of the 1% these huge piles of money? The 1%. of course. For example...

Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News, is apparently on a mission to destroy America. For this he is given about $30,000,000 a year (600 years of work for the average American household.) But his net worth tops two billion U.S. dollars, and some reports put it at $4-7,000,000,000. Even at the low estimate of two billion it would take the average American household 40,000 years to earn that much. Forty thousand years.

These folks, along with thousands of others in the media from Ann Coulter to Michael Savage to Charles Krauthammer to Rick Warren, and behind the scenes (Rove, Gramm, Dick Armey, Frank Luntz, etc.) are paid 1% level incomes to be salespeople. (Some may actually believe some of the twaddle they spew, but they are salespeople nonetheless.)


We have multi-billionaires and mega-millionaires – not a very bright group to begin with – wanting to justify their pettiness, a group of slick manipulators that is only too glad to take their money, and a public face of very rich sales people. Forums have been created or, as in the case of the Washington Post and CNN – and, come to think of it, most of the former mainstream media, they have taken over existing media.

With unelectable second-rate candidates who will do their bidding (not least because they're members of the 1% themselves) and a large force of sales people, they have turned attention away from their unqualified candidates (Nothing to see here, move on!) toward the opposition.

The result of the propaganda onslaught by sales people of the 1% has worked on about half of the Republican voters (the most gullible). 47% of the 47%. So they are voting against Obama rather than for Romney.

A Southerner in Yankeeland

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  exactly why the limbaughs have to be challenged (0+ / 0-)

    over and over.

    certainty sells on talk radio and there's a reason limbaugh makes more than all of them.

    there are a lot of racists but some are just believers. and they'r egoing to convince  a lot of late voters at work and at home, to vote against obama based on a string of distortions and lies that have been pounded into them. democrats could reduce that influence by attacking and exposing limbaugh's lies directly and visibly.

    colorado cong candidate Miklosi does that by saying in an ad that limbaugh seems to be running his opponent mike coffman's campaign.

    need more ridicule of republicans  like that- almost all RW talking points can be rebutted by saying something like "that's what limbaugh says"

    This is a list of 76 universities for Rush Limbaugh that endorse global warming denial, racism, sexism, and partisan lying by broadcasting sports on Limbaugh radio stations.

    by certainot on Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 11:35:04 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site