Skip to main content

Some conservatives think telephone polls are part of a pro-Obama plot
According to a growing number of conservatives, an accurate appraisal of polling data shows that President Obama isn't actually leading Mitt Romney by much—if at all—in the 2012 campaign.
The Romney campaign and other Republicans say polls showing President Obama with a significant lead over their candidate are inaccurate.

They argue many mainstream polls skew in Obama’s favor because of sample sizes that base 2012 turnout projections on 2008, when Democrats — and Hispanics, blacks and young voters in particular — turned out in record numbers.

One optimistic Republican even believes the polls show that Mitt Romney is leading President Obama:
Frustration that polls are skewed in favor of Obama has escalated among some on the right in recent weeks. One website,, recently began re-weighting the mainstream polls to closer track the demographic assumptions of conservative polling outlet Rasmussen Reports. The re-weighted polls all show Romney ahead in the race, with leads of between 3 and 11 percentage points.
Well, I guess if you start with the assumption that Mitt Romney is winning, then yes, all the polls are biased. But that's craziness. Still, even though polls are the most accurate and scientific measurement of where the race currently stands, it's no great surprise that some people refuse to believe them—the side that's losing is always going to come up with new and creative ways of living in denial. There's nothing shocking about the fact that some guy made a spreadsheet to readjust polls to match his predetermined conclusion—it would have been shocking if that hadn't happened.

But something about the GOP rejection of reality in 2012 feels a bit more desperate than usual. Republicans aren't just whining about the polls, they seem to believe there is a systematic conspiracy afoot to use biased polls to swing the campaign. For example:

John McLaughlin, a Republican pollster and consultant to GOP candidates, told the conservative National Review last week that Democrats are lobbying media pollsters "to weight their surveys to emulate the 2008 Democrat-heavy models."
"The intended effect is to suppress Republican turnout through media polling bias," McLaughlin said.
That's just nuts. If the media wanted to engage in a coordinated attack on Mitt Romney, the last way it would do it would be to hire a bunch of third party polling firms to manufacture pro-Obama survey results. And Fox News, whose own polling has shown Obama ahead, certainly would not be in on it.

The fact is that many conservatives won't accept President Obama's reelection even after it has happened. Hell, they didn't accept his election the first time around, so of course they think polling firms are players in a pro-Obama conspiracy. And when Obama wins, it won't be evidence that they were wrong: It'll be more evidence that they were right—and that the pro-Obama polling conspiracy was successful.

Originally posted to The Jed Report on Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 08:25 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site