Skip to main content

A team of researchers at University College London made a fascinating discovery regarding how we as humans retain news: that we remember good news, and we disregard bad news. By using magnets to stimulate the brain differently, they gradually got test subjects to incorporate more bad news into their recall and slowly got their subjects’ optimism to wane.

Nowhere is this “remember the good and disregard the bad” better exemplified than political polling. Right now, national polls like the Washington Post’s put Obama ahead of Romney, sometimes in the double digits in states like California, New York, and Romney’s home state of Massachusetts, and Romney’s other home state of Michigan. They show Mitt Romney ahead in double digits in states like Utah, Texas, and Oklahoma. While all of these polls are within the margin of error, the general consensus seems to be that Obama, while still close to Romney, is gaining ground.

But this is bad news for the GOP, and they weren’t going to incorporate that into their beliefs. So instead, they created UnSkewed Polls.

Conservative blogger Dean Chambers has started a new polling website that he claims takes the slant out of liberal mainstream media polls. He has decided that the current polls in the field sampled more Democrats than Republicans, and that those polls give a distorted view of the election and where candidates stand. He decided to take the national polls – Gallup, American Research Group, Washington Post, and others – and adjust them to reflect the Ramussen Reports partisan trends.

The result? Now Romney is leading Obama by 7.8 points.

With the polls “unskewed,” Romney leads Obama by 10 points on the American Research Group poll, by 7 points on the Washington Post/ABC News poll, and up by 10 on the Reuters poll.

See? All better, right?

The issue here is obvious. You can’t arbitrarily mess with it to suit your own needs. Even Scott Ramussen, of Ramussen Reports, thinks the “unskewing” of polls is ridiculous, saying:

“[Y]ou cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another.”

But Romney’s campaign has made it pretty clear they don’t believe in polling, or fact checking, or things that are true, so it’s not out of character that the campaign is changing polls to keep up morale.

Now naturally, the sample makes a difference in who people approve of and who they don’t. And I agree that polls should try their best to get an even sample of responses to a poll. But you can only make conclusions from the data you can gather – and sometimes, people don’t answer their phone or take a web survey.

Furthermore, people don’t always vote down party lines. I know a good number of disillusioned Democrats who will not vote for Obama this election. I also know a good number of progressive Republicans who are. So while equalizing a sample for a level playing field is a natural thing to do, this equalization won’t necessarily create the results that Chambers claims it would create.

In my mind, this disregard of fact and this acceptance of lies is the most emblematic trait of this election cycle. If it weren’t for the 2012 elections, I wouldn’t know that my body could shut down unwanted rape sperm. I wouldn’t know that Obama encouraged those on welfare to stay unemployed and reliant on the government dole. I wouldn’t know that Paul Ryan was a marathon man. I wouldn’t know that voter fraud is so rampant that purging voter rolls of hundreds of thousands of minority voters was the only way to remedy that problem.

And I wouldn’t know a lot of other things that are completely false.

If the conservatives were willing to take off their rose-tinted (and probably opaque) glasses and actually accept bad news, they would admit that the polls just aren’t in their favor. But rather than changing the data, they would serve the voters that elected them and do something to boost their polling numbers organically. And rather than pointing fingers and doing voodoo math, they would take action and do something to be approved of and praised for.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm overjoyed (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    88kathy, JeffW, freerad, Bob Love

    This is what losers do.

    I've been in the fail soup before. It sucks.

    It's also glorious when it's not your fucking problem.

    I've spent many election cycles in the past surrounded by fellow sadsack Democrats in denial cherrypicking polls, with Centrist weasels pre-tossing this or that 'far left Democrat who is killing the party' candidate under the bus weeks out to try and innoculate their own status quo epic fail from being associated with looming party-wide epic fail, and various forms and flavors of pouting liberals acting like chumps and fools long before the magic day in November, picking fights with each other out of sheer impotent frustration and rage.

    I don't miss it.

    I hope the GOP chokes on it for a generation.

    I hope the GOP spends as long out in the weeds of WTF as many of us did in some of the worst years for Democrats since 1980.

    I just hope the Democratic Party gets the message: You fight back, without regret or pause, you refuse to navel-gaze or flog yourself because the Village and Karl Rove demands it of you, you hit the GOP in the mouth and do it again before they start to whine and complain about it and you stand a much better shot of winning.

    It's amazing how much better things go for the Democrats when they aren't playing by rules set up to handicap the Democratic Party.

    You know you are winning an election when Movement Conservatives are trolling Daily Kos early on a Saturday or Sunday morning, and/or when the other side, rather than deal with reality, attempts to create a new one.

    Who the hell has time to generate pages and pages of fantasy data? Losers. That's who.

    Winners are too busy doing other things, like having breakfast and making plans, to troll as soon as the sun comes up on the weekend.

    If Movement Conservatism wasn't in the shitter over this election cycle, they wouldn't be spending hours and hours colating skewed data into charts and graphs and tables for other losers in denial.

    They'd be doing anything but that.

    I am from the Elizabeth Warren and Darcy Burner wing of the Democratic Party

    by LeftHandedMan on Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 02:32:55 PM PDT

  •  conservatives are creatures of habit (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    They've fallen into the habit of failing and don't know how to get out. In the past, the only reason these failures kept getting elected was because the Democrats did not contest the seats.  So, the losers won by default.
    It's like a civil law suit.  Anyone can file one.  If people who don't think the suit is valid and simply ignore it, they lose. The judgment goes to the plaintiff by default.
    In Georgia there are two Congressmen who are going to continue in the House because there are no Democrats or independents up for election. In South Carolina the field was ceded to Joe Wilson, the fellow who couldn't keep himself from shouting liar.

    We organize governments to provide benefits and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 02:38:06 PM PDT

  •  How strong are those magnets... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bob Love

    ...and where do they put them?

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 02:43:41 PM PDT

  •  Doesn't thing seem like something... (0+ / 0-)

    They would do in North Korea or Saddam's Iraq?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site