Skip to main content

The NFL Replacement Referees have proven that the that being a referee in the NFL is very difficult. The Locked Out Referees thought they had unique skills honed over years of practice. They were part of a very elite group that had developed a level of trust with the players and coaches in the NFL.  Coaches make mistakes, players make mistakes, and referees make mistakes, but on the field every week everyone involved was elite...the best in the game.  The coaches and players could play the game with confidence that the referees would have the ability and focus to call a good game.

Now the 31 team owners think differently (the Green Bay Packers are owned by the people). They seek the maximum rent on their ownership and literally have nothing to recommend them other than their position as owners. Players have to get drafted, make the team and then produce in order to get paid and keep their jobs. Coaches have to win and manage a team effectively. Owners just have the money to own the team.

Back in the 80s the owners used scab players during a labor dispute, they ended up caving. They found out that elite players were necessary and second tier players resulted in a diminished game.

Now the owners in their infinite wisdom have determined that referees can be replaced and brought in Division II and III college referees and the game has been diminished.

The owners are the only part of the NFL that can definitely be replaced.  Give me public ownership like the Packers for all 32 teams and let's replace the owners - the people that actually add no value to the game.

Originally posted to Kenevan McConnon on Wed Sep 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM PDT.

Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Romney has friends that own football teams (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MadRuth, Mentatmark, Larsstephens

    by Kenevan McConnon on Wed Sep 26, 2012 at 12:11:27 PM PDT

  •  I have often recommended that Los Angeles (3+ / 0-)

    invest in a team, just like the Packers. After being jacked around by Al Davis and then used as a stick to beat up communities into giving team owners new stadium deals in other cities, having ownership and control of an NFL team would be in our best interests.
    On the other hand, Los Angeles doesn't really need an NFL team, we have plenty of football already happening here.

    The NFL owners are just union busting again. It's like we are living in a Charles Dickens novel.

    The road to excess leads to the palace of Wisdom, I must not have excessed enough

    by JenS on Wed Sep 26, 2012 at 12:33:32 PM PDT

  •  You damn Socialist! I love it... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Kenevan McConnon, Larsstephens

    The players, officials and host cities are the three required ingredients, the private owners are just rent takers.

    Just your average every day Autistic hillbilly/biker/activist/union steward with an engineering degree.

    by Mentatmark on Wed Sep 26, 2012 at 02:15:22 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site