Skip to main content

The word "rape" on a chalkboard
Apparently, this is confusing.
It's not easy being a Republican these days, having to pretend you don't fully agree with Todd Akin and his "some rape isn't really rape" nonsense. Just ask Rep. Dan Lungren:
Republican Rep. Dan Lungren distanced himself from controversial bill language involving abortion funding in cases of "forcible rape" during a Tuesday debate with 7th Congressional District rival Ami Bera, saying he told the original sponsors of House Resolution 3 that he "would not support" the proposal unless the word "forcible" was taken out.

"So in fact, if you're talking about the mistake they made, I was the one who pointed it out," Lungren said. "... I can tell you it was after I went to them and told them I couldn't support it if they didn't take the word forcible out that they changed it."

You remember HR 3, the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act." That was one of the first bills Republicans introduced when they took over the House in 2011. It included language to distinguish between "forcible rape" and not-really-rape because it was really important to close the "loophole" that not-really-raped women were exploiting in order to cash in on all the fabulous gifts and prizes that come with being a rape victim.

And Lungren sure is proud of his refusal to support such a bill until that distinction was removed. Just one little problem with that:

Congressional records show, however, that Lungren signed on as a cosponsor of the bill when the legislation was first introduced, before 'forcible' was deleted from the text.
But, you see, it was an honest mistake:
His office blamed a misunderstanding at the time of the bill introduction for the disconnect. [...]

"When he got the bill and he reviewed it and he saw that somebody had tampered with that language he basically said that was unacceptable and he went to the original cosponsors and he said you have to change this," [communications director Brian] Kaveney said.

See? Lungren can hardly be blamed for supporting something he claims he opposed because he didn't understand what he was supporting. And there's no law that says you have to actually understand a bill before you decide to add your name to it, is there? Besides, he alerted the "original cosponsors"—apparently, he sent himself a memo—to remove the language immediately, so it's totally okay that he supported the bill once that language was gone. Just one little problem with that:
They're doing it again: After jettisoning controversial legislative language narrowing the definition of rape for the purposes of abortion law, House Republicans are attempting a backdoor maneuver to ensure that solely victims of "forcible rape" are eligible for federal funding if they seek abortions.
 Goal Thermometer

Nice try, buddy, but you can't support a bill to defund women's health care and redefine rape and then pretend you're not as extreme as the rest of your anti-woman party. Especially with a 100 percent rating from the National Right to Life Committee.

Let's send someone to Congress who won't try to defund women's health care, redefine rape, and then pretend it was all just a "misunderstanding."

Please give $3 to Democratic candidate Ami Bera.

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Thu Sep 27, 2012 at 11:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Sluts, Rape and Domestic Violence, Pro Choice, Abortion, and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site