Skip to main content

I didn't get to watch all of Melissa Harris-Perry's show this morning (it's not the weekend for me, not yet). But I did catch one of the early segments on voter suppression and the particular emphasis on the disenfranchisement of felons. In some states -- including mine, Arizona -- it's a permanent loss of the right to vote unless the state government in question intervenes.

What I saw on MHP about the practice was mostly stuff I knew, as I have written about this before. What I really appreciated, though, was the discussion on ways to fix this problem of disenfranchisement, on how to present the issue in ways that could reach the people and the politicians.

Here is the segment in question on how ex-felons are permanently disenfranchised in some states.

They brought up the 'felon trap' that Republicans in Florida seem to have set, which has been reported in The Nation and Colorlines, where ex-felons are receiving mixed messages from the state. Mailings about being registered voters with ID cards, and other mailings telling them their right to vote has been taken away. This could result in some people trying to vote who technically should not, thanks to Rick Scott and his conservative cohorts. This may give Republicans what they've been looking for, some examples of voter fraud, even if the Republicans' own incompetence at administering the state of Florida is the cause.

This is the word from Yvette Lewis from the NAACP, as she explains the quandary these folks have been put in by the GOP.

One woman has a voter identification card that shows she registered to vote on Feb. 7, 2012, and reads “You are currently eligible to vote in Hillsborough County.” But she also has a letter from the county dated March 7 that states, “The Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections office has received information from the State of Florida that you have been convicted of a felony and your civil rights permitting you to vote have not been restored at this time.” The letter includes a “Voter Acceptance or Denial” form that she must fill out and send back or she will be permanently removed from voter rolls. Lewis shows me a half-dozen other files of people with the same set of conflicting documents from the county.

“These people are getting voter cards—what do we do with them?” Lewis says. She pulls up another guy’s file: “Like this guy right here. He knows he’s a felon. He says, ‘Do I vote, Ms. Yvette, or what?’ So we were thinking, ‘What if it’s a setup?’ They go vote, and then it’s a huge argument to say after the election: ‘Voter fraud! We told you—voter fraud.’”

Melissa Harris-Perry had Brentin Mock, the author of the article from Colorlines, on to talk about the particular mess in Florida. The panel also discussed the different voter purges in Florida and how, in their urge to purge ex-felons, their purges caught up folks who never even committed such a crime. How the frequent changes in the law close to the election causes much confusion (like they're seeing in Pennsylvania with their frequent tweaking of the voter ID law there).

Past the halfway point in the video, Melissa moves the discussion to why it is that such disenfranchisement is seen as proper in the first place. Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) mentions a pernicious sort of practice where federal dollars are diverted away from the cities where people may live to the outlying communities where they are imprisoned, rewarding whiter rural communities for the presence of African-American prisoners.

The entire discussion was fascinating to me, and I'm watching it again to take notes here. Around the six-minute mark in the video is where Ari Melber from The Nation relates the argument about post-imprisonment restrictions for public safety -- restricting where someone goes based on their criminal habits, or placing restrictions on gun ownership for a violent ex-felon. But that public safety reasoning clearly does not apply to the right to vote. Ari compares this right to the right to free speech; what would it look like if we forbade someone from speaking in public? "That would feel un-American, this is as un-American," he says.

I tend to agree, and I think the case must be made against this disenfranchisement. Not because I know anyone who has been, not for any particular stake I have on the issue, I don't; I'm fortunate enough, privileged enough, that this problem does not touch my life or anyone I know. What purpose does it serve, this disenfranchisement? Because there is no connection to making society safer to be found here.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (7+ / 0-)

    “The other night I was lying in bed, looking up at the stars, and I wondered, 'Where the hell is my roof?” -- Steven Wright

    by tytalus on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 10:37:22 AM PDT

  •  the GOP Natl Committeeman in PA is a felon (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Long time GOP National Committee member from PA, Bob Asher of Montgomery County, PA, is a felon - and also filthy rich and a very generous contributor to the GOP.  He served a few years in prison for taking bribes.  I find it ironic that GOP Governors, Senators, Presidential candidates (incl Jeb Bush) generally favor taking away the right to vote from felons - but gladly accept campaign contributions from Pennsylvania's Bob Asher.

    •  Interesting story (0+ / 0-)

      a wiki page on him backs that up, too.

      It's true, it would be one thing if Republicans generally favored rehabilitating felons back into society as I do, but clearly they don't. Doesn't surprise me that they would make an exception for money.

      “The other night I was lying in bed, looking up at the stars, and I wondered, 'Where the hell is my roof?” -- Steven Wright

      by tytalus on Sat Sep 29, 2012 at 10:50:27 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site