Skip to main content

Crossposted on 43rd State Blues

This article by Clayton Trehal references the Vote NO on Propositions 1, 2, 3 movement of parents, teachers, and supporters of public education across Idaho, working together to reject the three harmful "Luna laws." These laws, ironically called "Students Come First," are implemented by Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Luna.

This morning I heard a “Vote Yes” ad on the radio that began with a line that ran something like,“Voters are being misled about the facts” and after all the usual talking points, the narrator explained that efficiencies gained by Luna's laptops would pay for the technology without any tax increases. She pointed out that traditional text books cost as much as eight times the price of e-books, which is a patently false statement that I'd like to debunk.

One would think that an ebook would be considerably cheaper than a physical textbook, but at this point, ebooks are actually significantly more expensive than physical texts. In order to verify what the vote yes folks said, I looked up an AP US History text book I know is one of the more popular texts across the nation and compared the price of physical vs e-copy, and here's what I found: A new copy of  The American Pageant, 14th edition runs $183.57 if you buy the physical copy, which is a steep enough price to make anyone want the ebook, which it turns out only runs $59.00. At first glance, it appears that one has saved a fortune going electronic, but as always, the devil is in the details. You don't actually buy e-textbooks like this one, you rent them for a period of time, and the $59.00 cost covers a 180-day period.


Bad for children. Bad for teachers. Bad for Idaho.

Now let's compare the two versions of this book side by side from the perspective of a purchasing school board to see which is cheaper. A physical books lasts 4-8 years, depending on how well it's taken care of,  so we can break down the price this way. If the physical copy of this text lasts 8 years, the cost to the district works out to $22.95/year vs $59.00/year for the ebook. If physical text only lasts for 4 years, the cost is $45.89/year, vs $59.00 for the ebook. Here's another way to look at it: If the district can get 5 years out of the physical text, its total cost for that period on a physical text is $183.57 vs $295.00 for the ebook over the same period. This is just one text, but I strongly urge readers of this to look up any textbook and you will see the same story. The bottom line is that currently, ebooks are actually significantly more expensive than physical texts because the textbook publishers want it that way.

Like so many other parts of Luna's laws, downloading textbooks on the laptops doesn't seem to have been too well thought out. If you consider that a typical Idaho high school student has somewhere between 6-8 courses, buying ebooks at 70%-200% higher prices than physical texts is certain to drive up costs for school districts quite a bit. Often the “Vote Yes” folks assert that we citizens are being misled, and indeed we are. The bit on their commercial about e-books being cheaper than physical texts is completely incorrect and seems like a pretty blatant lie to me. This is the only lie I feel like debunking today, but I personally hope some of our journalists and media outlets will take a look at the Vote Yes campaign and the misinformation they are spreading.

Reposted with permission

Why you should vote NO

Proposition 1

Teachers are some of the lowest paid professionals in the state. Thanks to budget cuts, many are making less today than they did three years ago. Some have to take a second job just to pay their bills. Yet many teachers still dip into their own pockets and spend hundreds of dollars every year just to provide the basics in their overcrowded classrooms — like pens and paper– because Idaho’s schools have been shortchanged by Luna and the legislature.

Proposition 1 takes away teachers’ freedom to speak up on behalf of Idaho’s students. It makes it illegal for our teachers to discuss classroom funding issues with their own school administrators and it bans them from talking about overcrowding in their classrooms or school safety issues during contract negotiations.

Proposition 2

You don’t choose a career in teaching to become rich — especially in Idaho. You do it because you care. Teachers are more than just educators. They’re advocates and mentors for our children. They know what our kids need to succeed. Proposition 2 forces teachers to teach to the test instead of allowing them to inspire more creative thinking in our children.

Each child is unique. It takes a dedicated, caring and highly-trained teacher to reach them. We don’t want to treat students like widgets on an assembly line. We want to make sure our kids are good critical thinkers, not just good test takers.

Proposition 3

Prop 3 imposes a largely unfunded mandate that takes away local control and dictates how and what we teach our kids. Forcing local schools to buy expensive technology and to pay for replacement parts will be much more costly than the backers of the laws claim. Kids are kids. Hardware will break. Taxpayers will be left to foot the bill.

Using computers to teach students is good, and already occurs in every school in Idaho. But we shouldn’t have to lay off teachers to buy laptops. We need teachers in the classroom to help our kids learn how to make the most of technology. One of the major providers of online courses in Idaho sent students’ English essays to be reviewed in India. The last thing we should be doing is outsourcing teaching jobs and our students’ education overseas.

Originally posted to The Book Bear on Wed Oct 03, 2012 at 01:03 PM PDT.

Also republished by Education Alternatives.


Idaho's "Luna Laws" Are:

5%2 votes
0%0 votes
12%5 votes
58%23 votes
23%9 votes

| 39 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I do not understand... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    The Book Bear, 123idaho this law is Constitutional.

    Just like other anti-Union laws it limits collective bargaining to certain issues.

    The Government cannot force people to work if they don't want to work. What is to stop teachers from striking anyway? Will Idaho actually throw people in jail for not working?

    Isn't that almost slavery?

  •  There are e-textbooks you can buy and own. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    The Book Bear, FG, Odysseus

    It doesn't appear that's the case with this one, but it was an option with some of my college texts (and with college text any discount on books was a god send, and I wouldn't have minded renting a few of them). Another benefit to e-books is they can be updated quickly easily and inexpensively, so you don't have to buy a whole new book to fix errors or for a chapter revision.

    That does not mean I agree with the "Vote yes" people however. I am a strong believer in Teacher's Unions and that they have a say in their classrooms. I'm also against teaching to the test.

    I'm also for the change over to e-text books, though not for a short term public school rental like this one that costs more in the long run. But e-books would increase access to text books that are now shared among classes and not sent home. If it's a choice between having one set of books for four classes and each child having an e-book version they can use to study from and work from at home, I'd pick the latter.

    "Madness! Total and complete madness! This never would've happened if the humans hadn't started fighting one another!" Londo Mollari

    by FloridaSNMOM on Wed Oct 03, 2012 at 01:36:53 PM PDT

  •  Right up until election day in 2010, Mr. Luna had (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FloridaSNMOM, quill
    ... nothing but praise for the successes and achievements attained by Idaho schools under his leadership. Within a few months following his re-election, he declared the Idaho school system broken and in need of drastic “reform.” He didn’t seek the advice of experienced educators as to what form that reform should take, and he didn’t listen to Idaho taxpayers when they questioned the wisdom and necessity of his Students Come First plan. Now it turns out that we are responsible for doing his job for him, too.

    We didn’t say it was broken, Mr. Luna. You did.

    We didn’t say reform was necessary. You did.

    We didn’t say we had a plan to offer, because you didn’t ask. It’s a little too late now to start demanding that we come up with a way to repair the damage you’ve already done.

    By the way, sir, I thought you had stooped pretty low by calling my friends and neighbors “union thugs,” but you demonstrated today that we have yet to see how low you can go.

    -- JamesGatz, in response to Luna's contention that his opponents should have come up with a counter-proposal for reform, instead of just attacking his plan.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site