Skip to main content

Personally, I can't for the life of me figure out why the media is falling all over themselves to portray last night as a clear-cut over-the-top Romney win.

I watched the debates, and at best thought it was a draw.  If Romney came out with an edge, it was marginal.

And for me, even had I known nothing at all about Romney before watching the debate, I would've been turned off by his performance.  I found him rude and obnoxiously aggressive, disrespectful to the moderator and the debate format by repeatedly interrupting and forcefully bullying the moderator into allowing him to continue to speak even well after his time was up.  Why the hell would I think this is a desirable trait in a President?

And sniping at Big Bird is a winning strategy with more than a small fraction of the population? On what planet?

And then there's the actual content.  Fact-checkers and various bloggers have already noted the fact that Mitt made at best a nodding acknowledgement towards the truth, and in fact big chunks of his comments last night were either entirely or mostly false, and in some cases demonstrably clashed with previous statements he's made on the campaign trail.

So, to the media, it doesn't matter if you actually say something factual in a debate, as long as you say it loudly overtop the attempts of the befuddled moderator to bring the debate back in line?  Behaving like a lying douchebag counts as winning?

I may have to take up drinking.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It's all about the Benjamins (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pinto Pony

    The media has a product to sell: your eyeballs, to its advertisers. A tighter race means more page views.

  •  I do not think the moderator was befuddled (0+ / 0-)

    He was in a no win position with both men pressing the time limits. Obama said he had five seconds more and went on for another minute. Romney said it was only fair for him to have the last word and took off.  The only thing that was fairly timed was the two minute closing remarks. I think it would have been better if they had a longer debate but then the talking heads would have cut into the local news.

  •  Eek, don't take up drinking (0+ / 0-)

    unless you mean nice, strong Indian tea with milk.  Possibly sugar, if you like sugar.

    It's well known in a certain country that a cup of tea will cure everything from a broken heart to a broken leg.  ;)

    "Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

    by Diana in NoVa on Thu Oct 04, 2012 at 02:16:11 PM PDT

  •  The Media Needs To Stay Relevant..... (0+ / 0-)

    Last night they got a horserace delivered to them on a silver platter.  Obama was competent, although he appeared tired.

    As soon as he started w/ the talk about his anniversary including the promise to Michelle that next anniversary he wouldn't be debating someone, my heart sank.

    I've had 44 anniversaries.....celebrating later that night or the next day would have been OK with me.  In the meantime, Obama has an election to win.  Don't start w/ an apology to your wife.

  •  Reminds me of how the media went ga-ga over (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DemandTruth

    Paul Ryan's convention speech.  Never mind that it was full of lies; he told the lies with such flourish.  But a funny thing happened after that.  The facts got checked.  Ultimately, there was no bounce because the American people did not buy it.

    Let's hope this is a repeat.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site