Skip to main content

The biggest news this week came Tuesday when Republican Judge Robert Simpson, under pressure from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, blocked the most important part of the state's much-disputed voter-ID law.

Simpson did not overturn the whole law (or his previous decision in the matter). In fact, the law is still valid. But for the November election, even though poll workers can ask for one of the few approved forms of ID, Pennsylvanians without one will be allowed to vote just like any other citizen. Before the ruling, they would have only been allowed to cast a provisional ballot. The court will further examine the law after the election.

Although a news agency reported that Republican Gov. Tom Corbett would not appeal the law to the state supreme court, and I repeated that report here, so far he has only said he is leaning in the direction of not appealing the ruling. One reason behind the reluctance to do so is no doubt the previous ruling by the high court that vacated the original decision by Judge Simpson. The wording of that ruling would seem to make any appeal unlikely of success.

State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, the Republican legislator who pushed the law into existence isn't too happy. The judge's decision, Metcalfe said, "is skewed in favor of the lazy, who refuse to exercise the necessary work ethic to meet the common-sense requirements to obtain an acceptable photo ID."

Pennsylvania has the strictest new voter-ID law in the country, but it is only one 15 states that have tightened their ID restrictions since 2008. Courts have approved the laws of three states—New Hampshire, Indiana and Georgia. In addition to Pennsylvania, court rulings or other legal action have at least temporarily blocked the laws in Texas, Wisconsin, Mississippi and South Carolina, although a federal court could change the situation depending on its ruling in the last case.

The laws, all of which were passed in GOP-dominated legislatures, place a discriminatory burden on the poor, minorities, the elderly and other citizens who vote heavily Democratic.

Lawrence Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice, the nation's largest non-partisan  source of voting rights research, said: “Every voter restriction that has been challenged this year has been either enjoined, blocked or weakened. It has been an extraordinary string of victories for those opposing these laws.”

However, said Penda D. Hair, a co-director of the Advancement Project, one of several groups that challenged the law Pennsylvania law:

“While we’re happy that voters in Pennsylvania will not be turned away if they do not have an ID, we are concerned that the ruling will allow election workers to ask for ID at the polls, and this could cause confusion. This injunction serves as a mere Band-Aid for the law’s inherent problems, not an effective remedy.”
Voter button
In fact, Judge Simpson labeled this a "soft run," according to The New York Times. Amy Davidson raised cogent points in this regard:
What effect will that have on people standing on line, who see those in front of them asked to produce something that they themselves might not be carrying? And Pennsylvania has an obligation now to make sure that all of the people who’ve been admonished to get their photo on a card now know that they don’t have to. No state, and no country, is better off for reducing civic participation—we have, if anything, an extra interest in making sure that the people least likely to keep waiting in a long line do so. A person who has spoken by voting is more likely to listen.
The Pennsylvania Democratic Party, Working America, the Voter ID Coalition and other groups that have been engaged in get-out-the-vote efforts, including informing citizens about the voter-ID requirements, have not packed up their operations. The Voter ID Coalition, comprising 140 civic, educational, legal, community and religious groups, will be retooling their door-hangers and other materials with the idea that while voter-ID will not be required this time, next time it will.

In addition, said Ellen Mattleman Kaplan, vice president of the Committee of Seventy, a century-old good-government group in Philadelphia, Simpson's ruling didn't change things for first-time voters or people voting for the first time in a new district. An older law already requires such citizens to show ID.

(Continue reading about voter suppression below the fold.)

In other news on the War on Voting

  • Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds early voting hours in Ohio, but...:
    The Obama campaign and Democratic National Committee have won a battle that could help boost voter turnout in Ohio by making it easier for the state's citizens to cast ballots. A ruling by a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a lower court decision overturning the state legislature's canceling of three days of early voting immediately before the election.
    Voter suppression sticker - I kept someone from voting
    However, the panel left it up to the county election boards about whether to open the polls for early voting on any or all of those days. Secretary of State John Husted, who holds the tie-breaking vote on the two-Democrats/two Republicans boards could choose to vote no if the board members split on partisan lines, as was thecase early this year in some heavily Democratic counties.

    The GOP-dominated Ohio state legislature didn't like the results of the 2008 election, which went too Democratic for them at the top of the ticket and for two congressional seats they thought they should have won. As a result, they chose to lop off the three days of early voting right before the election.

    Thousands of voters who might not otherwise have voted cast ballots on those days, especially on the Sunday right before the election. Those voters, a large percentage of them African Americans and low-income people who have difficulty getting to the polls on Tuesday, voted heavily Democratic.

    The court said, “The state must show that its decision to reduce the early voting time for non-military voters is justified by a ‘sufficiently weighty’ interest. The state has proposed no interest which would justify reducing the opportunity to vote by a considerable segment of the voting population.”

    [Husted] has argued in part that the reduced voting hours were necessary to address the needs of the Ohio elections board as it prepared for Election Day. The state also claimed that military service members and their families had unique challenges when it came to voting so that in-person early voting should be extended to them, but not to other Ohio voters.

    Husted could appeal to the full Sixth Circuit. And, as Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog explains, he would likely get a reversal if he chose that route. The Sixth Circuit has been deeply split along partisan lines over election issues and there are more Republicans on the court than Democrats.

    For now, however, it adds another notch to the belt of voter advocates who have fought early-voting restrictions, strict photo-ID requirements as impediments to voting by minorities, young people and the elderly.

  • See the Daily Kos account of the Mississippi victory here.
  • Riverside County, California, Democrats claim Republican registration fraud:

    Fewer and fewer Californians are registered as Republicans. Only 31 of the state's 58 counties have a Republican plurality, and those are mostly in lower-population regions like the state's conservative Central Valley. Only a single county has an actual Republican registration majority. But Democrats in Riverside County say a GOP voter outreach campaign has engaged in fraud to give the county GOP a 51,000 voter-registration edge.

    A complaint filed with the county registrar alleges 133 Democratic voters were re-registered as Democrats without their consent by petition circulators outside stores and welfare offices. One claimed his voter registration was changed when he signed what he thought was a petition to legalize marijuana. Others were offered a "job at the polls" or other bribes to sign paperwork that changed their registration from one party to the other.

    Steve Maviglio, a spokesman for the Democratic Party’s voter registration efforts, said Republican signature collectors might have improperly re-registered thousands of Riverside County Democrats. Maviglio blamed a GOP registration committee, the Golden State Voter Participation Project.

    A Republican spokeswoman said there is no advantage to doing what is alleged and that the group has strict "zero tolerance" rules in place about such matters. But being able to show large numbers of recently registered Republicans could be attractive to campaign donors who might see local and congressional races as more winnable.

  • N.H. Republicans trying to block student vote, says Bill Clinton:

    The former president said some students may think the election doesn't matter, but "Republicans in New Hampshire think it matters—that's why they've worked so hard to keep you from voting."

    Even since the 18-year-old vote was enacted in 1971, Republicans have sought to keep students from voting in their college towns. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1979 that students have the right to vote where they attend school even if they are not permanent residents of the state and don't intend to be. The ruling has not stopped all kinds of shenanigans directed at undermining that right.

    The GOP-dominated state New Hampshire legislature overrode the Democratic governor's veto this year to pass a law requiring all new voters to sign a statement acknowledging that they are subject to laws requiring drivers to register cars and get a New Hampshire driver's license. Because of the 33-year-old Supreme Court ruling, the state can't require students to be residents but the implication of the statement is that they are subject to all state laws. The issue is tied up in the courts and may not be resolved until after the Nov. 6 election. Last week, a state judge ordered that this statement be removed from voter forms:

    “In declaring New Hampshire as my domicile, I am subject to the laws of the state of New Hampshire which apply to all residents, including laws requiring a driver to register a motor vehicle and apply for a New Hampshire driver’s license within 60 days of becoming a resident.”
    State officials have appealed the order to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

    The Obama campaign has been actively urging students to register to vote in New Hampshire, where the margin in the presidential contest could be close.

  • Romney consultant's voter-registration operations bend toward sleazy:
    Nathan Sproul's Strategic Allied Consulting got fired by the Republican National Committee and several state Republican parties last week after apparently fraudulent voter-registration forms were discovered in a Florida county. The forms came from people working for SAC. At least 10 of the state's counties have since discovered SAC-submitted forms with phony information, many of them flagrant forgeries. False addresses have been used and party affiliations have been changed.

    Florida law enforcement is looking into the allegations of voter-registration fraud, which could be the foundation for election fraud. Since the Florida forms came to light, two other states, Colorado and Nevada, have found phony registration on forms originating with Sproul's operations.

    It is obvious now that the firm knew fraudulent forms were being filled out in August, long before a SAC attorney said this week that the recent revelations of bad forms were the first instance of this occurring.

    Stephanie Saul of The New York Times was unsuccessful at gaining an interview with Sproul, but that didn't stop her from explaining how his operations—using several names—have been paid $17.6 million by Republican committees, candidates and the Karl Rove-founded Super PAC, American Crossroads, mostly for voter-registration efforts.

    Sproul's operations have come under investigation before, dating back to 2004. Among the accusations has been the dumping of Democratic Party registrations. That and other allegations have been denied. The claim is made that with so many low-paid seasonal workers on the payroll, even the most rigorous background check won't weed out all the potential bad actors. But the fraud issues seem to fit a pattern:

    In Nevada, a complaint filed last month with the secretary of state’s office alleged that a woman, Cathy Sue Yancey, was told to tear up a form in which she registered as a Democrat and fill out another one without marking her party affiliation. [...]

    The election forms were traced to a Sproul operation. Similar allegations prompted an investigation by the Oregon Department of Justice in 2004. [...]

    Around the same time, officials at a library in Pittsburgh complained that Mr. Sproul’s company had used false pretenses — claiming to represent the nonpartisan America Votes — to get permission to set up a voter registration desk outside their building. It was only after visitors began to complain that the library learned that the canvassers represented the Republican Party.

    None of the investigations against Sproul's operations have led to charges being filed.
  • In a full-page ad, billionaire vows a million for voter rights:

    Mega-rich William Louis-Dreyfus, who once ran the commodity trading firm Louis-Dreyfus Global founded by his great-great-grandfather, announced in a full-page ad in The New York Times that he will contribute a million dollars to protect voting rights. He asked others to join him in supporting non-partisan voter advocacy groups. You can read the text of the ad here.

    Louis-Dreyfus explained his outrage to a reporter here.

    His daughter, Julia, played Elaine in the television show "Seinfeld." She now plays the title character, Selina Meyer, in "Veep.

  • The Daily Show took another hilarious whack at voter suppression.
  • Fearing voting suppression, U.S. minority churches use "souls to polls" to register, rally voters:
    Church leaders are distributing voter registration cards in the middle of services, and many are pledging caravans of “souls to the polls” to deliver the vote in a close race between President Barack Obama, the country’s first black president, and Republican challenger Mitt Romney.

    Activists worry that new election rules in some states, from tougher photo identification requirements to fewer days of early voting, are unfairly targeting minority voters — specifically African-Americans who tend to vote heavily for Democrats.

    “It has ignited a sense of urgency and collective power that we can take by engaging in the process,” said the Rev. Dawn Riley Duval, social justice minister at the Shorter Community A.M.E. Church in Denver.

  • GOP video trains "poll challengers" in illegal voter suppression techniques: New Mexico's voter-ID law will not take effect until 2014 but a hidden camera nabbed Pat Morlen, the vice chair of the Sandoval County Republican Party, teaching volunteers to demand photo IDs. Those without they are told to make vote on provisional ballots. Completely outside the law for this election cycle. The video was filmed by ProgressNow New Mexico and shows Morlen making additional bogus assertions.

    What's worse is that Rep. Steve Pearce, a Republican representing the state's 2nd District, is down with the illegal tactic.

    “We’re simply saying that we’re going to start, we’re going to take it back it into our hands,” said Pearce. “We should check for ID since you have to show an ID to do anything in America.”

    He did, however, admit that doing so would be against the law. “It’s against New Mexico law to check for ID,” the congressman conceded.

  • With Pennsylvania resolved for now, the voter-ID focus moves to South Carolina: South Carolina is one of the states that has added a voter-ID law since 2008, and it is now home to the only remaining unresolved legal challenge to be ruled on before the Nov. 6 election.

    Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, South Carolina is one of 16 states or parts of states that must submit any major voting law change for "pre-clearance" to the federal government. The Department of Justice refused to pre-clear South Carolina's change and the state sued in February. Late last month, a federal court spent a week listening to testimony regarding the law. It is expected to issue its decision well before the Nov. 6 election.

  • Here is a map showing showing voter-ID laws by state.
  • Minnesota Republicans challenge statements by Democratic secretary of state on proposed voter ID law:
    Two GOP state senators say the Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, a Democrat who opposes a proposed voter-ID amendment to the state constitution, has misled citizens while using his office improperly to oppose the measure. They also say he has falsely characterized the law in his arguments against its passage. Minnesotans will vote on the amendment in the Nov. 6 election.

    Ritchie said he does not comment on pending litigation, but noted in a statement Thursday: "I continue to work closely with local elections officials to ensure that the 2012 General Election is efficient and accurate."

  • Tennessee attorney appeals ruling approving state voter-ID law:
    A state judge rejected civil rights attorney George Barrett's objections to the requirement for voters to present a government-issued photo-ID at the polls. He has made an emergency appeal to get the case heard by Oct. 12 because early voting begins Oct. 17. He has called the law “an unconstitutional impediment on the right to vote.”
  • Judge approves Florida's revamped voter purge:
    A South Florida judge ruled Thursday that the state did not violate federal law by conducting a non-citizen voter purge within 90 days of a federal election.

    In a 24-page ruling, U.S. District Judge William Zloch wrote that the state had a compelling interest to protect the voter rolls and denied a request by a coalition of voting groups to stop the purge of 198 voters whose citizenship was in question.

•••  •••  •••

  • The roots of voter suppression by Ron Carver:
    When I hear conservatives like Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, Alabama state Sen. Scott Beason, and Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Rep. Mike Turzai try to rationalize their bid to disenfranchise minority, elderly and student voters, I pivot quickly to memories of the terror I witnessed in the early 1960s.

    At that time, just out of high school, I joined the Southern civil rights movement's efforts to register hundreds of thousands of black Mississippians.

    Ninety-five years after the 15th Amendment affirmed the right of black people to vote, I stood with 30 African Americans in the rotunda of the DeSoto County, Miss., courthouse. Lit cigarettes rained down on us from the second story balcony, courtesy of a dozen sheriff's deputies and highway patrolmen. Trying to keep everyone's spirits up, Menk Dockery strode over to take a sip from the "Whites Only" water fountain and declared, "This freedom water sure is fine."

  • Despite recent defeats, right will keep pushing voter suppression laws by David Dayen
  • Attack on Voting Rights Isn’t Racist—Just Ask Artur Davis by Brentin Mock:
    When Artur Davis took the stage at the True the Vote national summit in Houston earlier this year, the audience, almost all of whom were white tea partiers, went wild. Davis flattered the group, thanking them for coming out when they could’ve been at home watching the NFL draft. But the crowd was plenty excited to see their own star draftee: a Southern black politician who had come to confirm that their agenda is not racist.

    “This is not a billy club,” he told the audience, waving his drivers license. “My mother, my father and grandfather were raised on the banks of the Alabama River, at the turn of 20th century. They can tell you what a billy club was and it’s not this. This is not a firehose. I’m from Birmingham, Ala. I used to count on a lot of senior citizens to work the polls for me. I used to organize a lot of my elections. They can tell you what a water hose is. This is not Jim Crow.”

  • Partisan judges rule partisanly on voter suppression cases by Maya Wiley:
    [C]onsider this — For much of the past year, the debate hasn't been in the legislatures. Rather, they've been in courthouses. Less examined is the extent to which the rulings in these cases have been partisan and what that says about the state of our democracy.

    There have been a dozen or so challenges to various forms of voter suppression laws in key states this election year - Ohio, Wisconsin, Texas, Florida and Pennsylvania, to name a few. Of the pro-voter cases in those four swing states, nine judges who voted to protect the right to vote were appointed by Democratic administrations; four were appointed by Republican administrations. The only "block the box" rulings came from Republican-appointed or Republican-identified judges.

  • Voter suppression by Republican contract firms undeniable by Vanzetta Penn McPherson
    Just as bank robberies — even a string of them — are a poor substitute for systematic embezzlement, ID fraud is useless as a tool of consequence. As the Republicans and their operatives — mainly Strategic Allied Consulting, a firm which the Republican National Committee paid $3 million for voter registration drives — amply demonstrated, real voter fraud is a planned, adroitly executed monster, with tentacles in several places that attack the entire system at its core.
  • Judge Simpson rescues Republicans from their own craziness by relaxing voter-ID law temporarily by Francis Wilkinson:
    It took a dose of truly bug-eyed insanity for Republicans, whose brand is not in great shape to begin with, to launch a voting-rights war in which minority voters would be the obvious casualties. As former Florida governor Jeb Bush and other voices of reason have pointed out, there is not a great future in the U.S. for an all-white political party. Yet it's hard to imagine a better way to galvanize the nation's emerging multiracial majority into long-term opposition than to set up roadblocks to their right to vote. (Well, it could be worse. You could be caught on tape explaining that the purpose of the restrictions is to help Republicans win.)
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Driving through middle PA on Tuesday (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, Supavash, dclawyer06, retLT

    I went to a donut shop with stickers on the door and counter saying "Romney/Ryan: It's a no brainer"

    Ok, after you ponder what that means, another story.  The older lady on break tells the owner "I registered for renewing my driver's license but they told me it would be over a month before I get my renewal.  I guess I won't be able to vote".


    So after the court ruling, I guess she can vote.  She probably can't drive to the polls but she can't vote.

    Way to remove Republicans.

    Mitt Romney's moral compass points to the Cayman Islands.

    by captainlaser on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 08:06:01 AM PDT

    •  But does she KNOW she can vote? (0+ / 0-)

      That's more than half the battle.  This is one case where the more Republicans are clueless, the more it helps!

      Early to rise and early to bed Makes a man healthy, wealthy, and dead. --Not Benjamin Franklin

      by Boundegar on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 10:37:41 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  What a list (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    majcmb1, orlbucfan, dclawyer06

    These creeps win by 1% and then go about their venues of destruction.  What needs to be understood is that this is the only way the current Republican Party will be able to hang on to be the 2nd political party in this country.  Once that is out in the open that poor ol' elephant is on its way to the elephant graveyard.

    •  Exactly right... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eric Nelson, renzo capetti

      You'd think more journalists would connect the dots from all the voter suppression campaigns around the nation and start reporting on the real story, the tacit acknowledgement by the GOP that they can no longer win a governing majority without disenfranchising voters.

      But then the MSM would have to drop the "both sides do it" framing they love so dearly...

  •  I hate the Rs; they are truely evil (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    renzo capetti

    The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

    by a2nite on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 08:18:48 AM PDT


    I think the word ACTION appears as part of Daily Kos's standard front page?

    Join, Donate, Help Voters



    Election Protection Hotline

    Is someone interfering with your right to vote? Or do you have a questioin about voting issues? Call the Protection Hotline at Election (866) OUR-VOTE (866-687-8683) or visit this website: to ask questions or report voter interference issues.

     Tell everybody to take this toll-free number to the polls in case they have any trouble voting:


    More on the website:

    Tell everyone you know:  Our voting systems are not protection enough; only a massive show of Democratic voters will prevent election fraud by Republican operatives. It's much harder to flip the votes when there is such a big VISUAL difference in the turnout.
    "Counting Votes 2012: A State by State Look at Election preparedness"

  •  War on Voters: Grand-daddy of current GOP (5+ / 0-)

    The Republican Way:

    Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome": Good Government. Classic clip from 1980.

    "Now many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome — good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."

    This video was produced by People For the American Way:

    NOTE: They truly fear democracy for its messiness. They believe the Left will bring about the end of civilization. You know, mob rule. So they have to keep the rabble in line.
  •  PA: Just heard my first "No ID, don't bother" ad (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Supavash, citizendc, Eric Nelson

    on the radio today.

    So apparently they've just started the ad campaign, because i've been listening to that station every day for months and never heard any of the "Voter ID: It's the LAW in Pennsylvania" ads before (sponsored by PA dept of commerce).


    •  Someone in PA needs to get to court ASAP (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eric Nelson

      & demand those bastards be slapped with a cease-&-desist injunction pending final disposition of Judge Simpson's ruling. And once the ruling is upheld/allowed to stand, slap the state with another injunction requiring them to run correction spots in their place.

      Fuck the mythical “moral high ground”. There’s plenty of time to shower after the election. (h/t danah gaz (fka gaz) @ Balloon-Juice)

      by Uncle Cosmo on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 08:48:56 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  yep (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eric Nelson

      I heard the ad today on the radio. Made me want to scream. How can the state be paying for misleading ads?

  •  True the Vote is a big lie (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    True the Vote began in a county south of Houston. If they are not racist,  why did they target an election in downtown Houston and one of the most prominent Afro-African members of Congress, Sheila Jackson Lee in 2010.

    Instead they could have focused on their own Texas county and left the rest of us voters alone. Voter suppression is not welcome here!

  •  Question: Punishment for denying someone's right? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Does anybody know what current laws are about punishing people who prevent people from exercising their right to vote?

    Do we need to advocate for stricter laws and punishments?

    BTW, I'll buy it when seeming racists say they are not racists. When I was  coming of age.....early in the general consciousness of the existence of the Civil Rights Movement the general term used was PREJUDICED.

    It was as if racist was a term reserved for those with grand theories of why certain groups are inferior or superior.
    Racists wouldn't have anything to do with any member of 'out groups.' Prejudiced people might be fond of some individuals of 'out groups' but regard the group, as a whole, as suspect.

    •  I think voter suppression penalties (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      LNK, a2nite

      need to be drastically upgraded. It should be a felony to deliberately mislead people about voting rights.

      Take the "Can't(or)" out of Congress. Support E. Wayne Powell in Va-07.

      by anastasia p on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 09:47:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  You might want to edit (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Meteor Blades, Eric Nelson
    A complaint filed with the county registrar alleges 133 Democratic voters were re-registered as Democrats without their consent by petition circulators outside stores and welfare offices. One claimed his voter registration was changed when he signed what he thought was a petition to legalize marijuana. Others were offered a "job at the polls" or other bribes to sign paperwork that changed their registration from one party to the other.
    I think you meant reregistered as Republican!

    American Television is a vast sea of stupid. -xxdr zombiexx

    by glitterscale on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 08:44:31 AM PDT

  •  You have to have election monitors with cameras. (0+ / 0-)

    You have to have police present to arrest poll workers who break the law by asking for ID.  

    It might be better to pass out leaflets to all neighborhoods, telling voters to to report any poll worker who asks for ID and then call for police when they do.  

    Polling stations could get messy and swing states could be up for lengthy counts and court actions, which is exactly what the Republicans want, as well.

    Again, this is the kind of fight Republicans want, and Democrats have to be up to their nasty kind of vote battling. We can't let another Florida happen.  

  •  Now this is an interesting turn of phrase-- (4+ / 0-)
    The judge's decision, Metcalfe said, "is skewed in favor of the lazy, who refuse to exercise the necessary work ethic to meet the common-sense requirements to obtain an acceptable photo ID."
    Hear that dog whistle, folks? Looks like Lunkhead Luntz must've put out the word that "lazy" is the Thugs' 4-letter word of choice these days..

    Fuck the mythical “moral high ground”. There’s plenty of time to shower after the election. (h/t danah gaz (fka gaz) @ Balloon-Juice)

    by Uncle Cosmo on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 08:52:50 AM PDT

    •  Really? REALLY? (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Meteor Blades, a2nite, Eric Nelson

      What "work ethic" is involved in an elderly person trying to get a Motor Vehicle Bureau that's inaccessible to public transportation, or a young single mother working two jobs an by the time she picks up her kids from daycare, the BMV is long closed? These assholes are getting on my last nerve. My wish is that every one of them show up at the polling place and find that a snafu has dropped their sorry self from the voting rolls.

      Take the "Can't(or)" out of Congress. Support E. Wayne Powell in Va-07.

      by anastasia p on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 09:49:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Michigan also has a victory for voting rights (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Meteor Blades, Eric Nelson

    In Michigan, a federal judge ruled against [Republican] secretary of state Ruth Johnson, who arbitrarily* created a requirement that voters "affirm their citizenship" on the ballot application before they can get a ballot. The judge ruled against the affirmation because it caused confusion and delays which impeded voting. Three cheers for a judge who recognizes that mucking up the voting process is disenfranchisement.

    (* Actually, not so arbitrarily: All the evidence points to it being deliberate vote suppression, with bonus anti-immigrant hysteria.)

  •  judge simpson (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    is a fascist thug and people like him need to be thrown off of any bench in america, the voter purge in america is nothing more than a communist like activity to rig all elections up and down the ballot, treating the people doing this with any respect is doing damage to our democracy, they deserve nothing but contempt and jail for continuing this suppression effort.

    its time to stop the kid gloves method of trying to push back at these fascists activities, true the vote is sending a million people out to the polls around the nation to challenge voters, of course they will mostly challenge poor, minority, young, voters etc, i hope they challenge me, that will be an experience they won't soon forget i promise you that, an aggressive response when they challenge someone at the polls is the only way to react, not violence but letting them know this activity will not be tolerated under any circumstances.

    after this election cycle the feds need to get involved and make sure all states enforce every citizens right to vote without intimidation or suppression of any kind, and that activity must be a felony punishable by jail time and or a fine, then the politicians that are condoning and pushing this anti-american agenda need to be called out and voted out of office or charged under the law, the only way to fight fascism is with equal intensity if not more.

    the con fascists in america have been intimidating fellow citizens of ours for decades and we have done nothing to help them out, its time for all citizens that abhor what is being done to our democracy in the name of voter protection to stand up and fight for other citizens to be treated as we all want to be treated, if not then soon each one of us will be treated to the humiliation some in our society have been subjected to for decades, then who will help us when we need it.

    •  We had one at the Cleveland BoE this week (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      where probably 85% of the people voting were black. But because Ohio law prohibits challenges or interacting with voters, all he could do is watch. I doubt anyone paid him much attention.

      Take the "Can't(or)" out of Congress. Support E. Wayne Powell in Va-07.

      by anastasia p on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 09:50:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Nathan Sproul, Strategic Allied Consultants (4+ / 0-)

    Sproul is uncomfortably twitching in the "kleig lights" as the Bush Administration used to say.

    He was caught, red handed, and, finally, the media is taking real notice.  And it helps that Congressman Cummings also has threatened to investigate.

    Don't let Sproul slip away again.  They are in major damage control mode over this fellow.  GOP "fired" him...  He's on Fox News.  Michael Isikoff is carrying water for him.  They are scared...  But he's still at work.  Don't let him slip away.

    He even went on Fox News yesterday to claim conspiracy.

    Nathan, tip for you.  If you are accused of the same thing every two years for the past 12, you must be doing something wrong or illegal.


    Frankly, Sproul must be a little worried too.  The last GOP man who knew too much was Michael Connell.  

  •  When I was in the army, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Eric Nelson

    I renewed my MO state driver's license by mail. By doing so, my license didn't have a picture. It stated,
    "valid without photo, military." When I was discharged, there was a period of time that I was in non government photo ID limbo as I didn't have a military ID anymore. My biggest problem was buying a drink. I'd have been irate if they wouldn't let me vote. Can you imagine if this happened to a troop who just came home from Afghanistan or Iraq just before election day?

  •  Awareness is the first step to defeating this (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    orlbucfan, Eric Nelson

    anti-democratic action.
    Informing yourself and others is the next step.

    I have done observation in the past. I may just stick to
    informing my neighbors and others of what is going on.

  •  Voter ID laws (0+ / 0-)

    If it's a good law, it can wait until the next cycle to make sure everybody has the proper IDs before it takes effect..  Trying to ram it through in a hurry is what we used to call the "bum's rush".   High-pressure salesmen (boiler rooms), used car salesmen, and insurance salesmen do the bum's rush all the time, trying to get you to spend money for defective products before you have a chance to think about it.
    All of the republican-majority states have had a field day with ramming through legislation that, in the light of the next day, is not in the best interests of the general population.  These bum's rush laws are not good for our democracy.  I worry for our country.

  •  By the time his term expires he will be too old to (0+ / 0-)

    run for reelection.  That's why he can act like this.  Voters have virtually no way to punish him.

  •  Not true that all the laws are GOP-led (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    orlbucfan, a2nite

    Here in RI, as Ann Coulter triumphantly pointed out, ""One of the first states in the union to pass voter ID bill was Rhode Island, 85 percent Democratic legislature," she said. (Politifact here.) "And who pushed it? A black Democrat in the house, a black Democrat in the senate." (Both are my very own Rep and Sen.) And our left-leaning independent Gov. Chafee signed it, in part because he understood that the minority community supported it. Various minority groups like the NAACP did not support it, but the ones in the legislature did.

    OTH the RI law is much milder than some, with many types of IDs that qualify and this year even non-photo types. It's a pain in the neck (I worked as an election clerk in the primary and will again on Nov. 6) and I doubt it's accomplishing anything. But it is not an ALEC law and was not designed by Republicans.

  •  I am a PA resident. After a story on Rachel (4+ / 0-)

    Maddow show last night about PA county election web sites having outdated or incorrect Voter ID info. I checked for my self.  Several county election sites I visited DO still show that ID is REQUIRED.  I plan to contact some in my area, but will have to wait for Tuesday because state offices are closed for Columbus Day.  This is crazy and will definitely cause people confusion.  MISSION ACCOMPLISHED PA Republicans.

    •  I saw that... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eric Nelson

      Rachel sounded exasperated that it took her continued attention to get them to take the false information off their websites/call centers.

      Civic orgs, local democratic groups, local newspapers & news stations have to step up and do their jobs.

      Republicans are shameless--they would've left that bad info up until election day.
      Thanks for doin some of the heavy liftin', fuzz...

  •  NH Voter... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Meteor Blades, Eric Nelson

    I am still waiting on my absentee ballot from the NH Clerk's Office. They just got the new printing of the ballots and promised to mail them out this next week - WITHOUT that Residency Paragraph.

    O'Brien screwed up in passing that bill changing the Voter Laws in NH. I don't see them making any headway against allowing college students to vote unless they pass ANOTHER bill to do that. Hopefully, after this election we will see a Democratic State Senate arise to confound and crush O'Brien's Tea Party fanatics.

    "I think it's the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately." -- George Carlin, Satirical Comic,(1937-2008)

    by Wynter on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 09:34:26 AM PDT

  •  Systemic, planned and anti-democratic. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Eric Nelson, a2nite

    Thank goodness the Courts still have some level of sanity [in most cases] remaining.

    But if we keep getting Republicans as President, those Court slots will be filled up by increasingly bigoted and delusional anti-American right wing extremists.

    Republicans totally abandoned conservatism in the 1980s ..

    by shpilk on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 10:21:00 AM PDT

  •  I'll count victory when it passes the SCOTUS. (0+ / 0-)

    And even then, you know they'll keep pushing.  Just like they've kept pushing for decades on Roe v Wade.  Just like, after a century of pushing, labor unions are almost a thing of the past.

    Early to rise and early to bed Makes a man healthy, wealthy, and dead. --Not Benjamin Franklin

    by Boundegar on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 10:36:13 AM PDT

  •  Rachel Maddows team exposed Pennsylvania.. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Meteor Blades legislature for ignoring court ruling banning voter suppression.
     She called them out and now the've taken down the state website's wrong info message that you must have photo ID in order to vote: (30 second commercial - sorry)
     And it's not just Pennsyvania Rachel is targeting but Ohio and other republican controlled state legislatures that are refusing to change their outgoing information centers messages (tax payer funded misinfromation btw) Information the GOP is counting on causing delays and confusion amongst voters.

    So Rachel is putting out the alert to all citizens to call your own election officials to correct any misinformation you see or read and make some noise about it.

    These rulings are victories for democracy so let's keep the GOP honest force the GOP out in the open when they try to flout the law

    Thx MB - great compilation, hotlisted

    •  Eric, not everywhere! They did make the change (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eric Nelson

      in the two counties she contacted, but there are 67 counties in PA, several of which still have the old information.  The PA should be required to do ads saying that ID is NOT required for the election in November.

  •  Don't forget this from Florida (0+ / 0-)

    That's great for PA, but voters in Florida (even ones with ID) might still be screwed.  

    Florida has a horrific defect in its voter challenge law that is not getting enough attention.  

    If a paranoid poll watcher sees that you have a different haircut than the picture on your ID, they can challenge you.  An honest election judge does NOT have the power to call bullsh*t:  you must vote a provisional ballot.   Provisional ballots are not "counted" on election night and are not adequately estimated when the media "calls" the election in the state.  See Who Watches the (Poll) Watchers, Part III for more.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site