Skip to main content

Current as of 10/06/12
One of the more interesting polls I've been watching this time around is the Rand tracking poll which tracks the voting preferences of the same 3500 people over time. The poll is a rolling average over seven days. While I wouldn't say this is a perfectly scientific poll (people drop in and out of the electorate for all sorts of reasons), I think it does capture something with respect to general trends. I think it captures the sentiments pretty well of those who truly move back and forth between the candidates.

From this poll so far, I take away two things:

1. Romney got a bump, but not nearly the bump he needed to turn the tide built against him.

The way this poll works is that 1/7th of the 3500 are polled each day. Over the last three days Obama went from about 50 to 49. Romney went from 44 to 45. A two point shift? Meh.

2. Yesterday's response indicates to me the bump is already subsiding.

Romney's goal in that debate was to avoid being written off by his fundraisers and the media. That goal was accomplished due to the lack of contest from Obama. That wont happen again. Romney will live on, but the same questions that dogged him before the debate (can he win?) will begin to dog him again after his small bump recedes.

We will begin to see on Tuesday how the national and swing state picture looks. I suspect they will all report Romney gains, but not significant enough gains to give him a path to victory. Modest gains methinks. As for the President, I think he will give back a point or two and then hold steady as people wait to see the next debate. Perhaps, with the good unemployment number, he main even get back to 50 prior to the debate.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site