Skip to main content

The president's debate performance was awful in terms of not hitting back at numerous over-the-plate softballs.  I get that.  Those of us who watched and liked or knew most of his answers thought initially that the debate was at least a draw if not a few points to Romney.  But we also thought that by changing all his stripes in front of tens of millions of people that Romney at best would be considered a fraud, at worse a no-good lying politician.

That said, the media and conservative pundits are trying to make this a horse race.   Yet there is one category of voters that is completely left out.  That category of Republicans who believed Romney when he spoke about the 20% cut
in taxes across the board during the campaign, when he completely ditched that idea
"if it would contribute to the deficit".

Sure conservatives like Morning Joe, and pundits like Chuck Todd are guffawing in the aftermath of a Skewed Pew polls, but what about the conservative lot.  Are they asking themselves 'who is this Swiss Mitt'?  They must be asking themselves 'its okay to swing to the left of Obama as long as he is out to win, but what if he actually means what he says?  We are screwed!'

A diary by JMcDonald "RAND poll shows Republicans dispirited, Democrats energized by debate ?!" is more informative than the Skewed Pew in that its taken by the same 3500 voters each time and may illustrate the true aftermath of the debate.  Were these Republicans turned off by Willard Mitt Romney, chameleon extraordinaire?

http://www.dailykos.com/...

Just as many Democrats were left scratching their heads about their candidate, it's a good bet that many Republican voters were left even more perplexed, perhaps even speechless about what was actually said in the debate.  

Whereas conservative pundits and their media minions are fist-pumping today about Skewed Pew, they are not however rerunning the full-on policy shift by their man.
Indeed, their underlying question in days to come is WHO IN THE HELL IS THIS MITT ROMNEY?  

Democrats know who their man Barack Obama is because he has an economic, foreign policy, healthcare, and women's rights record.  He's been front and center for four years and is transparent to the world.  Although he can be a little too self-assured when he thought he could forego an intense debate prep for the first debate.

The Republicans, on the other hand, have no clue as to when the real Mitt Romney will show up.  His effortless flip-flops would be a thing of wonder if not for the fact that he just flip-flopped on the very reason they opted to vote for him.  While Romney may have won this first debate there is no doubt that President Obama will be up to the task on the second and third one.   What Republicans must be thinking from is can they trust their man on anything?  

Romney just showed the nation that he will do anything to win.  Republicans must ask themselves is that the best thing for the nation but, more importantly, (in their minds) is that the best thing for the Republican party.

The answer is simple. Mitt Romney is all about Mitt Romney.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site