Skip to main content

Today I   posted a quickie    which included these words from kos:

You see, Republicans want to destroy Social Security, and Democrats want to ... destroy it a little less? God, I hope not. But that's the Obama people got last week.
Now the    campaign website    has 'clarified' the President's position, still talking  about how much he and Romney agree FTW !!!!! (Hat Tip to Common Dreams)
The President knows that guaranteed Social Security benefits are not handouts, but a bedrock of the commitment to retirement security America makes to our seniors. He believes that no current beneficiaries should see their basic benefits reduced, and he will not accept any approach that slashes benefits for future generations. President Obama stands firmly opposed to privatizing Social Security—the future security of hard-working Americans should not be dependent on the fluctuations of the stock market. That is why the President has called on Congress to develop a bipartisan planthat follows these principles:

    Any reform should strengthen Social Security for future generations and restore long-term solvency.

    The administration will oppose any measures that privatize or weaken the Social Security system.

    While all measures to strengthen solvency should be on the table, the administration will not accept an approach that slashes benefits for future generations.

    No current beneficiaries should see their basic benefits reduced.

    Reforms should strengthen retirement security for the most vulnerable, including low-income seniors.

    Reform should maintain robust disability and survivors’ benefits.

No "slashing."

No "slashes."

Oh nice.  No slashing might just translate into like Dean Baker figures, 3% cuts for the older seniors who could least afford them.  

Now those are real confidence building words, no room for misunderstanding that position.     Color me skeptical--reminds me of the weasel words like we saw on the Public Option.    We can do better than that.

Who is pushing for 'reform' anyway ?

Who ?

The Raiders of Your Lost Retirement

Had read elsewhere that this was the case......

What You Need to Know About Obama and the Social Security Sell-Out

The Raiders of Your Lost Retirement are busy laying plans in Washington.

 Will Obama help them if re-elected?  

Some Senators have said they won't go there.

Senator Bernie Sanders  has confirmed this and has signed a pledge with others in the Senate to stop it.  He, along with 29 or so other Senators have signed on.
The Nation
“I fear very much that there is a possibility that in a lame-duck session (after the election), President Obama and Democratic leaders will be pressured to make cuts in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid in exchange for some modest revenue increases — much of which will end up coming not from the wealthy but from the middle class,” Sanders told The Nation. “That’s not the way to go, but I’m convinced there are Democrats who are prepared to make that compromise.”

Sanders and twenty-eight other senators have signed a letter declaring that they will “oppose including Social Security cuts for future or current beneficiaries in any deficit reduction package.”

Sanders wants to hear Obama and Biden make that commitment, in coming debates— and on the campaign trail. The senator’s right to demand clarity from the president after Obama confused the issue with his unsettling and (hopefully) inaccurate line about sharing a “somewhat similar position” with Romney.

We should urge the President to firmly state he will not change Social Security.

And we should urge our Senators insure that's what happens.

Originally posted to divineorder on Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 07:04 PM PDT.

Also republished by Team DFH.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site