Skip to main content

Reblogged from

Last week Tom Fitton, president of the right-wing group, Judicial Watch, said that "he is afraid [President Obama] and his gang are planning to steal the election". He was speaking to a group of "poll watchers" part of an organization called Truth the Vote which is reportedly preparing 1,000,000 people to "watch" the polls in November. The group, which was investigated by the Justice Department in 2010 for voter intimidation in Texas is now under scrutiny by Congressman Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland) who has recently launched a congressional investigation into the legality of the group's tactics.

In listening to Mr. Fitton and the rousing reception from his audience, it's clear that these people have become so delusional in their fight against a fictional President Obama, one who is creating "food stamp armies" to come out in full on election day, that they've made themselves willing thugs for a party that will gut the programs many of them need for survival. They exemplify the model of the Freudian "authoritarian personality", one who projects his or her own aggressions onto stereotypes of "the other".

And it's a gob smacking notion coming from Fitton, to claim that the President is the one trying to "steal the election", considering that since 2010, forty-one Republican-led legislatures throughout the country have passed, are trying to pass, or have been stopped from passing, laws that make voting harder for everyday citizens. The unquestionable effort to disenfranchise millions of people, often lower-income, minority, elderly, students ... likely Democratic voters, has been a collaborative wave against the foundation of our democracy.

And the biggest case of voter fraud now is with Republicans in Florida, whose shenanigans threaten to cause problems such as double-registrations and phony address changes, just to name a few. In the state that launched the prototype for voter intimidation & fraud.

Funny how the mainstream media would rather run rampant with stories about "the President's poor debate performance" than to call Republicans out on their vile & unpatriotic tactics. Why do the work of reporting real news when so much empty hype is handy? Particularly when it displeases the corporate masters.

And, now I'm the one apparently living in the alternate reality since I was thoroughly shocked at the pundit pile-on of the President immediately after the debate last Wednesday and continuing until today. Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Ed Shultz, and others, I love ya but I'm going with Gandhi on this one when he says "if a million people believe a wrong thing, it's still a wrong thing".

I honestly did not see the same debate that so many other "disappointed" people & pundits saw. What I saw was a balanced, measured & reasonable President Obama debating a straight-up lying Mitt Romney. The etch-a-sketch moment his campaign promised and, for which, he seems to be getting rewarded. At this point, I don't feel its rude to call Mitt out as a liar as only an idiot doesn't know that it's true. How does one engage in battle with fools? An observer might wind up confused about which one is which. In my view, President Obama handled the debate well and boxed Mr. Rmoney in on his newly-found, previously-held, and concurrently, disputed positions.

Republicans not only want to take us back to the 1950s but seem to forget that such a thing as video is available now.

And confusion seems to be the game plan as we wind down to the final weeks before the election. Just throw out a few smoke bombs and maybe the truth will get lost in the mix.

When Mittens touted the new term "trickle-down government" 9 times during the debate, I thought it might be an attempt to twist the narrative.  Like Tom Fitton's projection about the President, claiming him the cheat, Jack Welch's borderline treasonous accusations against the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and various other such foolishness, the Republicans now seem intent on just muddying the waters so thickly that no one can wade through it. Trickle down government .. trickle down economics ... it's all the same, you know.

I can't imagine that the people who still support these clowns are made up of liars & cheats. But how else could one support them when they've shown themselves to be so unscrupulous? I actually have a few close friends who support Mitt Romney but when pressed about why, repeat only Republican talking points, commonly known as "misinformation" as per FOX News. However, that Republicans have put so much effort in lying & cheating and so little effort in taking care of the peoples' business and actually governing, makes them unelectable, in my book. Do they really feel so lacking in ability that their only recourse is to cheat? And that it's so blatant I find most disturbing. Seriously. After months of mind-boggling flips & flops, what can Mittens say now that can be believed? How can anyone take him for a serious contender for the Presidency of the United States when the most consistent things about him, these days anyway, are lying and dodging taxes?

Needless to say, I'll be voting straight blue in 3 weeks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  What In The World Are THEY Worried About? (3+ / 0-)

    In some polls, Romney has jumped 12 points since the debate.  Voters purges are rampant in Florida, they're dragging their feet in Ohio on early voting, Democratic registration is dwarfted by new Republican voters in a number of states. the polls are apparently no longer "skewed" now that they're winning.

    I repeat.....what are they worried about?  

  •  Here in Florida it's that re-registration (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    business that has my blood boiling:

    But it's not blatant fraud like this that has elections experts worried about possible voting mayhem come November. Rather, it's the re-registration of voters, where personal information such as someone's party affiliation, signature or address could have been changed without the person's knowledge.

    "If they're submitting the names of dead people or Mickey Mouse, that will be caught," said Daniel A. Smith, a political scientist at the University of Florida. "The more pernicious type of fraud is where they change the addresses of people already registered, so that when they go to vote, they'll be at the wrong precinct."

    Here's The REAL Dangerous Type Of Voter Fraud

    After reading several articles about this, I went online today to double-check both my husband's and my registrations. They were clean, but I hope others will do so too now so that they don't run into problems on election day.

    P.S. I added to your tags so hopefully the Election Diary Rescue Team will find this diary.

    “Mitt Romney is the only person in America who looked at the way this Congress is behaving and said, ‘I want the brains behind THAT operation.’ ” — Tom Perriello

    by hungrycoyote on Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 11:11:54 PM PDT

  •  That never happens in California... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    At least where I live.  No voter fraud/roll purging/long lines/re-registering.

    Lots of people vote absentee because you can.

    Am I the only person who thinks that maybe we should take a look at our electoral college situation if it really does all come down to Ohio.  We got one state who will decide the election.

    Their Republican state governement is doing everything it can to prevent dems from voting.  I mean good lord, challenging for their right to cut off the last three days to the early voting?  Are they insane?

    There is absolutely no reason why anyone should have to wait in line for hours just to vote.  For me it is an in and out thing.  We were supposed to have fixed all this voter suppression bull.

    Ohio, you better not let us down.  You have peeps in the 47% too!!!

  •  A Federal Voting Rights Amendment needs (0+ / 0-)

    to be passed after this election that would require all states conform strictly to federal regulations on voting and voters' registrations such as:
    (1) Early voting would be mandated for the 45 days before an election, including absentee and mail-in voting.
    (2) For six months before an election, no laws regarding voting could be enacted.
    (3) Voting rights would be reinstated for all persons convicted of felonies who have completed their jail sentence/probation.
    (4) Voter fraud is a problem, but the big problem is people tampering with voter registrations and disenfranchising voters. The laws against this need to be strengthened and prosecutions pursued with strict enforcement and severe penalties meted out.
    (5) The identification necessary to establish one's status as a legitimate voter needs to be standardized and minimized so that the pool of voters is widened, not narrowed.

    Clearly the Republican Party is intent on disenfranchising as many Democratic or likely Dem voters as possible because they can no longer win with their aging "white-man" demographic. When they obstruct the voting rights of their fellow citizens, they need to be pursued and prosecuted severely for tampering with this most basic right of all citizens.

    •  Hear, hear! (0+ / 0-)

      I absolutely agree. What Republicans are doing is illegal and, unfortunately, they're not being called on it. In my opinion, every serious journalist, reporter & news station should be shaming them for their unpatriotic behavior.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site