Skip to main content

In 1869, Republican Governor of Wyoming Territory, John Allen Campbell, signed a law granting “every woman of the age twenty-one years” the opportunity to vote in any territory election.  Voting rights for women were included in the Wyoming state constitution in 1889, the first state to do so.

Many opinions are offered by historians and others as to why Wyoming in particular was inclined to be the stand-alone leader taking the issue of women’s suffrage from advocacy to action.  Much has been written about the motivation of the prominent man who introduced the bill to the Wyoming territorial government, William Bright, a Democrat, Union veteran and business owner.  While it is likely Mr. Bright had political reasons and personal convictions influencing his actions, many other men involved in the decision making process may have been encouraged to support women’s rights for more biological reasons.

                                                   7,219  -v-  1,899.

The number of males versus the number of females listed in the 1870 United States Census for the Wyoming Territory.  The numbers indicate an abundance of single men, a common problem of westward expansion.  Uncommon was the Wyoming approach to the problem.  The same year Wyoming Territory granted women voting rights, the territorial legislature also passed laws requiring equal pay for teachers without regard to gender, as well provided married women property rights irrespective of their husbands.  All three laws were designed to make the hardscrabble territory life more palatable to the independent women needed to help populate the West.

Was the effort successful?   Perhaps.  The 1880 US Census makes particular note of the significant movement of women to Wyoming, finding now 14,152 males and 6, 637 females, a more favorable ratio.

Fast forward fifty years.  The Nineteenth Amendment is passed and ratified under an initially reluctant Democratic President Thomas Woodrow Wilson.  The vote to provide women voting rights as a United States constitutional amendment was successful because of the actions of U.S. Senate Republicans.  Of the 56 “aye” votes in favor of passing the Nineteenth Amendment, 36 were from Republican Senators.  The Republican National Committee of 1919 broadcast their support in a Jan 11th, 1919 New York Times article “Declaring for Universal Female Suffrage by Constitutional Amendment”.

Reading the 2012 RNC Platform, I am struck by the five paragraph section devoted to voter rights.  A section given more ink than the sections of the platform dedicated to both the First and Second Amendment of the US Constitution.  Not to mention how anti-woman the party has become.  The States Rights party that was an undeniable and valuable mechanism securing the changes to the Wyoming and United States Constitution granting expanded voter rights now advocates removing the right of individual states to determine some of their own voting mechanisms, in particular mail-in ballots.

There is a reference in the current RNC Platform regarding protecting the integrity of the US Constitution of our founders.  This seems to ignore the indelible role Republicans have played in protection of the fluidity of our Constitutional documents and that particular purpose of constitutional amendments to protect the forward evolution of rights for all of American citizenry.

http://www.fordham.edu/...   (R –v- D vote tally)

http://www.census.gov/...   Volume One Zip Drive 1870a-16

http://www.census.gov/...  Volume One Zip Drive 1880a_v1-16 (p 664)

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site