Skip to main content

Not according to his campaign anyway, not when he can get away with it. When Romney says "If you re-elect President Obama, you know what you’re going to get. You're going to get a repeat of the last four years,” either he is predicting another catastrophic global financial system meltdown, or he is asking the electorate to develop amnesia. I strongly suspect it is the latter.

Strip away the bravado and Mitt Romney is essentially a one trick elephant. Leaving aside Romney’s appeal to America’s extreme right on social issues (since he himself would rather not discuss that agenda in public debates), his whole case for asking voters to throw out Barack Obama and install himself as President instead comes down to his assertion that a second Obama term means America settling for another four years like the last four, which hardly anyone thinks of fondly.

If one simply omits all consideration of the effects of the Great Recession, Romney has a point. Unemployment, after all, is at the same level today as it was when Obama was sworn in; 7.8%, and that’s the good news. For most of Obama’s first time it was considerably higher. What type of achievement is that? Bad President, Romney scolds, no second term for you.

So what else was going on during all of that time while Barack Obama was failing to find jobs for millions of Americans?  Oh yeah, the deepest and most dangerous international economic downturn in over 80 years, which was deeply entrenched and spinning out of control before the President was even elected. Take gas prices, for example, which had spiked to $4.40 a gallon by July 2008. They fell off of the same cliff that virtually all available credit careened over as entire sectors of international commerce began grinding toward an excruciating halt. It seems global demand for fuel collapses when the world economy goes into shock.

By the time Barack Obama took office, a mere 6 months after that peek, gasoline prices in America had tumbled to $1.80 a gallon. Today, with a domestic and international recovery underway and far greater demand for fuel, gas costs an average of $3.77 a gallon in America.  So of course Mitt Romney blames President Obama for doubling gas prices on his watch. He claims that gas price increase is proof of President Obama’s failed policies:

“The proof of whether a strategy is working or not is what the price is that you pay at the pump,” Romney said at Tuesday night’s debate. “If you paid less than you paid a year or two ago, then the strategy is working. But you are paying more.”

By that logic, of course, President George W. Bush’s economic meltdown strategy was a smashing success. Who doesn’t like gas prices falling to $1.80 a gallon? No one, well no one except maybe the millions of Americans who were thrown out of work and/or lost their homes and/or saw their life savings go down the drain during the Great Recession. But if you leave that part out, the economic disaster that took place on the Republican’s watch (not to be confused with the National Security disaster that also took place on the Republican’s watch) it all seems so straight forward. The price of gas did double under President Obama. Bad President, go to Chicago (or Kenya depending on which surrogate is speaking for Romney at the time).

Mitt Romney wants Americans to judge President Obama’s first term in office as if we all were living through ordinary times, but there was nothing ordinary about what Obama faced when he first stepped into the Oval office; two American wars and one terrifying global economic meltdown. President Obama avoids playing the drama card excessively, so he tends to understate what he was confronted with. It wasn’t “a mess” that he had to clean up after during his first term. A mess is what ones’ kitchen might look like after throwing an ambitious dinner party. Barack Obama inherited a full blown disaster, one that verged on becoming a catastrophe.

So when Mitt Romney belittles President Obama for an unemployment rate that is the same today as the day he first took office, he is leaving out some details. He is leaving out the part where the American economy fell into a mine shaft, plus all of the struggle needed to climb back out to reclaim level ground. Mitt Romney is being inherently dishonest with the American people. It is conduct unbecoming a would be future President.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  For Romney, the great recession DIDN'T happen (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Tom Rinaldo, a2nite, lonespark

    like the rest of the 1%, his money was safe and secure -- some of his stock values may have plummeted, but NONE of that affected his cost of living.

    He didn't lose significant income. He didn't have to worry about his ability to retire, to support his family, paying for health insurance, being able to pay his mortgage(s), or anything like that.  

    We don't know (because we haven't seen those tax returns, have we?) if he claimed any losses from those years.

    But as far as his normal day to day living went? I'm sure he wasn't the least bit worried.  In part because he had MORE than enough resources to weather the storm, even if the worst should happen here.  And in part because... well, I don't think he is all that savvy, or even the slightest bit concerned, about anything that doesn't directly affect HIM.  He really didn't care if GM went bankrupt, after all -- and he knew damned well in that case, GM bankruptcy would have been liquidation, not re-organization.  He doesn't think outside his own bank accounts, and I'm sure HE was just fine....

    •  Thanks for writing this (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JanetT in MD

      I thought of that meaning also and considered trying to work that read on the subject into this Diary to begin with, but chose to single track instead  I almost looked up the statistic about the percentage of the gains from the recovery from this last recession went to the top one percent. If memory serves correctly, well over 90%.

    •  This is the basis for a stand alone Diary (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JanetT in MD, lonespark

      Hope you decide to make one from it

      •  I don't have the research... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Tom Rinaldo, lonespark

        ... the hard facts and documentation  to back this up; I'm not an economist or anything.  

        But historically, it just seemed to me that in the FIRST great stock market crash and great Depression, the rich were just as likely to be wiped out as the poor and working class.   But when the system was rebuilt over the decades since then, the one thing the wealthy made sure of was if the financial system ever collapsed again -- it wouldn't happen to them.  Just the Little People.  

        We heard about Wall Street bonuses after the big firms were bailed out -- we did not hear any stories of those who caused the meltdown going broke, or hell, going to jail or even getting fired.   Ordinary folks lost their pension investments, saw their mortgages go underwater, but the wealthy elites just kept pushing for their tax breaks.  If they'd been hurting, you can bet your big-donor-dollars that the Republican logjams in the House and Senate would have been lifted, PRONTO, to let more economic stimulus happen.  

        The 1% is not hurting right now.  They're sinking millions into SuperPACs and sitting on millions more rather than invest in anything that might make things better.  They're waiting it out... hoping their guy can get in, if things just get bad enough for the rest of the country.  

        That's just my take on it....  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site