Skip to main content

There were many moments during the debate Tuesday evening that caused me to have deep concern for women’s rights, but it was the reference to “binders full of women” that triggered a flashback.

In the early eighties, I was one of five women working in advertising sales in the Detroit area where 90% of our clients were automotive accounts. Just going through the interviewing process was an eye opener for me. All of my interviews were with men but none more sexist than the Sales Manager of a major local radio station telling me he didn’t think “I had the balls to sell radio." I was determined to prove him wrong and sent a huge box of various sized balls to him with a note simply saying “From a woman with balls." He still didn’t hire me…his loss.

After working in the business for two years, I was called by the Manager of a major national magazine to come in for an interview because he was told he “had to hire a woman." My hour-long interview was completely about just how successful he was. When he made it apparent that the interview was over, I asked if he would like to hear about the success I’ve had. He answered that it wasn’t necessary.

I learned that the handful of women working in advertising sales in Detroit were also called to interview and upon finishing the interviewing process he informed his management that there were no qualified women to fill the position.

Fortunately the business has changed tremendously with women representing a majority in advertising sales and many of the automotive clients are women.

So to hear about the “binders full of women”, avoidance of answering the question about equal pay, talk of flexibility in the workplace so women can get home to cook dinner and suggesting women get married before having children as one of the solutions to our gun violence all had me once again wondering what decade we were in.

Let’s be very clear about what’s at stake for women in this election. Some are trying to paint this as purely an issue of abortion. Yes Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and the 2012 GOP Platform clearly state they will overturn Roe v Wade and this will be accomplished with the appointment of anti-choice Supreme Court Justices. But our concern goes well beyond abortion.

The Romney/Ryan ticket knew they were losing women’s votes so they are now trying to confuse us by changing their stances on many issues. It is our responsibility as voters to make sure we know where the candidates truly stand on the issues, not simply believe their spin.

This can be accomplished by looking at Paul Ryan’s votes and budget, not how he’s now trying to sell a different position. We can look at the approved 2012 GOP Platform, that clearly states where a GOP House, Senate and Presidency want to take this country. And while almost every video of Mitt Romney states a different position on every issue, one of those positions aligns with Paul Ryan and the GOP Platform.

On pay equality:

•Paul Ryan voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act

•The GOP Platform has nothing about pay equality

•Mitt Romney did not answer the question about the Lilly Ledbetter Act when asked months ago and didn’t answer the question about pay equality in the debate

On the Blunt Amendment which allows employers to exclude contraceptives from the health insurance plans provided to their employees for moral reasons:

•Paul Ryan voted for the Blunt Amendment

•Mitt Romney stated that he supports the Blunt Amendment

•The GOP Platform states no organization required to provide or withhold or refer medical service against their conscience

On the Personhood Amendment which defines life as beginning at conception that would limit contraceptives and in vitro fertilization:

•Mitt Romney stated he supports the Personhood Amendment

•Paul Ryan co-sponsored the Sanctity of Life Amendment in 2009

•The GOP Platform states that the unborn shall have full citizenship rights

On Violence Against Women Act:

•Paul Ryan voted against the passed Senate re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act

•Paul Ryan was the co-sponsor of the Sanctity of Life Amendment in 2009 where the redefinition of rape appears as “legitimate rape”

•The GOP version of Violence Against Women Act eliminated protections for gay, Native American and immigrant women

On Healthcare/Medicare/Medicaid:

•The GOP Platform states repealing Obamacare, transitioning Medicare to a premium-support model and converting Medicaid to a block grant program for states

•Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have vowed to repeal Obamacare

•Paul Ryan’s budget turns Medicare into a voucher system and increases prescription costs for seniors

On Gay rights:

•The GOP Platform states they will enforce the Defense of Marriage Act and pass a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman

•Ryan voted against repeal of DADT, employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, the Matthew Shepard hate crimes Act.

•Mitt Romney declared marriage as between one man and one woman and asserted that he would seek a federal marriage amendment.

To further help make your decision, here is the 2012 Democratic Platform.

If this isn’t enough to help in making your decision, imagine if all of the legislation passed in the U.S. House of Representatives had passed through the Senate and been signed by the President. Personhood, DADT, and the Blunt Amendment would be law. Obamacare would be repealed, Paul Ryan’s entire budget would be law and we would have a 6-3 Supreme Court putting Roe v Wade at risk.

I’ve tried to put forth facts to help navigating through all of the rhetoric, but I cannot end this without expressing personally just how concerned I am for women in this country if we allow candidates who are determined to take our rights back to the 50’s to take control of any office in this country. This is not just about the legislation they are attempting to force on us. It's an attitude toward women that will reverse decades of breaking down barriers in our homes, in our schools and the workplace. Please vote and encourage everyone you know to vote!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I hear ya. (4+ / 0-)

    Imagine going for an interview for a job that would have been a very good fit, but being pretty young and naive still. And being told that you'd be a great fit for the job, but "we've never had a woman in that job."

    It wasn't illegal then, and it was a major internationally-known institution. I hear they're a bit better now, sort of.

    Imagine a bit later working for a major financial institution and watching men with less experience and fewer qualifications being promoted ahead of you. Paid more, too.

    I voted today for President Barack Obama. He's not perfect, but with him in the Oval Office I won't lie awake at night worrying about the overall well-being of American women.

    "There are no Americans at the airport!" -- Baghdad Bob
    "I’ve got a very effective campaign." -- Mitt Romney

    by Mnemosyne on Thu Oct 18, 2012 at 05:06:41 PM PDT

  •  Binders and the End of Men (0+ / 0-)

    Are people still mocking feminists? I found the debate sobering. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are here. Sure, we're a few steps ahead, but we're still in comparable universes. Anyone still talking about "having it all." Seems amazing that just a few weeks ago we were talking about how men are coming to the end of their usefulness; maybe this is their backlash for us getting uppity.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site