Skip to main content

One of the most perplexing details in the bedeviling Gallup tracking poll is the huge disparity between how the South thinks of Romney and the rest of the country's opinion of the man.

Ezra Klein tweeted earlier today that he'd inquired of Frank Newport of Gallup if he was seeing a popular vote/electoral vote split. Newport's answer, in as many words: Yup.

So be it. Let's grab some maps and take a gander at those implications below the break.

Nate Silver, as of this morning

I took the liberty of making my own map based on Nate's most recent data and uploading it here...

Before any Nate-watchers wig out: The indicated EV numbers are "safe" seats for the respective candidates. This is the map that most Kossacks would treat as conventional wisdom - the baseline understanding of which states are in contention and which are not, and in which way the dice are currently rolling. It's a map with lots of possibilities for both campaigns.

Then Gallup comes along and pees in the progressive porridge. Or do they? It's one thing to say that Mitt Romney is currently up by seven points nationwide. It's a much different matter to say, well, ahem, cough, Romney's up +22 in the South and down between four and six points everywhere else.

Now, I'm not privy to Gallup's breakout of regions by state. I'm having to 'use the Force' in the following map, where I adjust Silver's forecasts and 'Gallupize' the map to reflect what Frank Newport is seeing: A world where the South is solidly red...and states you might not think of as being in play MAY be just that...

Well, well! Obama 260, Romney 211! A LOT of states that were in play are no longer in play... and this isn't necessarily awesome news for Republicans. So they get Florida and North Carolina. Virginia trends lean GOP. But looky elsewhere! Arizona, Missouri, the upper Great Plains... that is, if Gallup's got it goin' on.

Now, let's assign all the leaners to their respective parties...with one exception. It's the only state that matters, if you are Mitt Romney AND if Gallup is correct:


Here is the map if Ohio goes into overtime:

Obama 266, Romney 254! Talk about a nail biter! And even if he manages to bag New Hampshire AND Iowa (not likely), he still needs Ohio. Obviously, there are scenarios such as a win in Pennsylvania, but if that happens then it's just going to be a very, very long night for the blue team.

So, backing off the nightmare scenarios: What are we looking at here?

If Gallup's right, and if the Romney internals are comfortable with letting the South be the South, then doing things like pulling staff from North Carolina and putting them in Ohio make sense. Shutting down rather unsavory voter registration (read: pick and choose who gets to vote through selective registration, a rather criminal thing to do in most states) in Florida, Virginia, et cetera makes sense. Making a play at libertarians re marijuana legalization in Colorado makes sense as a side bet.

The point is, even now, we have the same situation as in August.

President Obama can lose a LOT of battleground states and still win.

Governor Romney essentially has to sweep the board - and take Ohio.

And on a side note this is my first adventure in using images in a diary. How'd I do? :)

 CORRECTION: It's Ohio and probably Iowa

Early on in this exercise I'd flubbed on Iowa, which PPP and my own back of envelope calcs suggest might not be as in the bag as thought. So Romney would indeed have to pick of Ohio AND one other small state.

The good news being, this is even better news - just not for John McCain. :)

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site