Skip to main content

Climate Silence on Uncle SamNational Defense, the magazine of the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA), has this banner headline at this time: "New wave of global threats".

The November issue's lead article:  Top Five Threats to National Security in the Coming Decade.  Reading that article suggests, in comparison with the uninspired question arenas for tonight's Presidential debate on foreign policy, that National Defense has laid out the basis very appropriate question for the debate.

The National Defense Industrial Association has identified five critical national security threats for the coming debts.
  • Biological weapons;
  • Nukes;
  • Cyber-Attacks;
  • Climate Change; and
  • Trans-national Crime

Please explain your perspective on these, highlighting arenas for the American public where your precepts and approaches differ from your opponent.
Clearly, this question could lead to a serious discussion for days on end, rather than a few minutes, but it would put on the table five quite serious arenas of "foreign policy" and allow the candidates to draw out differences. (This path, of course, would risk that the candidates would continue the climate silence through addressing issues other than climate change.  Cyber-threats, for example, are showing themselves as quite real issues in economic (espionage, criminality), privacy, energy security, traditional national security, etc terms that merit serious discussion in the nation and, well, by the nominees.) Thus, an even better approach would be to devote a reasonable period of the debate -- perhaps 30 minutes -- to go through this list, allowing the two candidates to address each of these five in turn.

Kudoes to National Defense for an interesting article (which merits reading, discussion and debate) that provides the basis for a meaningful Presidential debate item.

Here is the tentative (likely) list of question arenas for tonight's debate:

  • America’s role in the world;
  • Our longest war – Afghanistan and Pakistan
  • Red Lines – Israel and Iran
  • The Changing Middle East and the New Face of Terrorism – I
  • The Changing Middle East and the New Face of Terrorism – II
  • The Rise of China and Tomorrow’s World

Shocking, when considering this list, it is hard to see that any of these "top five threats to national security in the coming decade" identified by the National Defense Industrial Association fit cleanly into the list. (Obviously, climate change is relevant to all of these ... as is cyber-attacks as are ... but they are discussions to make them fit rather than specific raising of any of the five.)

Here is what I commented when first seeing the list

Let's see:
  1. 4 of the 6 are on the Middle East. Guess we know, clearly, what is "the world". Of BRIC, only China? Nothing on Europe, Japan, Oceania, Africa, South America...
  2. Nothing here on how the world community works together (or not) on critical issues -- like how does the Global community cooperate (or not...) on addressing climate change. Or, for example, what is the role of the UN, international law, and otherwise as related to the United States.
  3. What about questioning about the varying tools of power? Military, economic, cultural, diplomatic...
  4. What about trade?
Now, as per this post, I would certainly add a "5":
Why not use National Defense's identified top five threats to national security as the basis for a debate question or for a portion of the debate?
PS: I spent a very interesting day, last week, at the Navy Energy Forum, hosted by NDIA and the U.S. Navy.  I plan on writing several pieces from / based on / derived from the discussions yesterday.   Hat tip to the NDIA National Defense staffer, who highlighted the "top five threats" article to me when I discussed climate change with him.

PSPS:  A recent post re National Defense magazine, Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence … NDIA edition …

PSPS:  There are many who have noted the crickets of climate science in the debates. Some of the excellent discussions of this include:

Brad Plummer, WashPost, Five energy topics that won’t come up in tonight’s foreign policy debate — but should

Chris Hayes, MSNBC, Silence on climate change at the debates

Brad Johnson, Climate Progress, Will This Be The First Time The Debates Are Silent On Climate Since 1984?

Michael Levi, Council on Foreign Relations, Five Reasons to Talk Energy and Climate at the Foreign Policy Debate

Originally posted to Climate Change SOS on Mon Oct 22, 2012 at 09:01 AM PDT.

Also republished by DK GreenRoots and Climate Hawks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site