Skip to main content

Lincoln was right: You can't fool all of the people all of the time. But you don't need to. All you need is a working majority, and one way to achieve that is to convince folks that your side is all about principle while the other side is all about air-headed opportunism. That, in essence, is the theme the right has used for 40 years to deregulate finance in ways that led straight to the 2008 meltdown.

But what if it turns out that the right doesn't actually believe in the free-market "principle" it peddles? What you'd have is a giant insult added to an egregious injury.

How to interpret the response of George Will that you see at 7:30 here as anything but conservative incoherence? Will has made a career attacking as "nanny-state" liberals people who want to use government to temper market outcomes. But he can't reconcile his free-market principles with his real-world preferences.

This is the sort of cognitive dissonance that produced the system which blew up in 2008 -- and which, despite everything, is running neck-and-neck with Obama. Does that say more about public gullibility, or about Obama?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Gullibility is part of why Millard is running (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    a close race. But a far larger reason is racism and fear of "the other". Face it, since before his election in 2008 he was called "Kenyan". That was just a media-approved way to call him a "nigger". All the other labels, "secret Muslim" "Socialist dictator" and the like are just dog-whistles. When you see Romney supporters showing up at rallies wearing, "Put the white man in the Whitehouse" you know the real reason Millard is close isn't fiscal gullibility it's something far, far worse.

    Every time Romney and Republicans mention Benghazi it proves they are the sort of opportunists that would mine for gold in a graveyard.

    by ontheleftcoast on Tue Oct 23, 2012 at 03:27:47 PM PDT

  •  I think is says a hell of a lot about public ... (0+ / 0-)

    ...gullibility. There are probably more than a few  of those well heeled  1% public people and their (followers) that have no clue why they drink the conservative koolaide  and beleive  in the free market principle without really know how it "operates".  They just like the wealth it supposedly produces.

    Our nations quality of life is based on the rightousness of its people.

    by kalihikane on Tue Oct 23, 2012 at 07:04:30 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site