Skip to main content

Thanks to Right Wing Watch, I got to read a ridiculous opinion piece from the 'Christian Post' about how the bible is the best voters guide. While it strikes some birther notes and subtle bashes on the President, I can only imagine the level of cognitive dissonance required to cast a vote for Romney based on it.

Birther, eh? Yeah, I think so. The writer says a civil leader must be...

Known (Exodus 18:21; Deuteronomy 1:15; Deuteronomy 17:15)
Civil leaders should be selected from among their own people. People must know the candidate. This is why the Constitution of the United States requires the president must be naturally born in the U.S.
I see no reason to dismiss that remark as mere coincidence. The concept of a "natural-born citizen" has been key to the debunked conspiracy theories of birthers since Obama took office, since they needed some excuse behind which to hide their prejudices.

Not that they're fooling anyone but themselves, really.

Right Wing Watch picked on the article, and rightly so, for specifying that the bible says to vote for men, not women.

A male (Exodus 18:21; Deuteronomy 1:13)
The Scriptures require that we "choose wise, understanding, and knowledgeable men." The word men used here is not the generic term for "mankind" but rather the word for "male." Everywhere the qualifications for civil leaders are mentioned in the Bible, males – not females – are identified.
Michele Bachmann shrugging her shoulders
I wonder if this means that candidates like Michele Bachmann should be rejected by the bible-thumping electorate? Perhaps candidates like her serve merely as a bridge, a temporary solution until they can all be replaced by men.

Keep going, though, and I can see...potential problems with putting this particular voter guide to use by the christian right.

Truthful (Exodus 18:21; Deuteronomy 16:19)
We are to elect men who keep their word. Most civil leaders in the United States take an oath of office with their hand placed on the Bible when they assume office. Our government is based upon promises from our leaders to keep the law and be truthful. Jesus Christ says, "Let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For whatever is more than these is from the evil one" (Matt. 5:37).
This may pose a slight problem for Mitt RMoney, considering that even Politifact (ha!) has two pages' worth of whoppers devoted to the mittster. Willard's lied so much that columnists and pundits now spend their time picking and choosing the biggest and most easily debunked lies, the most egregious flip-flops and denials, just because he does it so much.

That's not all, though. The proposed bible voters guide saves the best zinger for last.

Mitt Romney and Bain buddies, before they sought membership in the victim class (the one that does not pay federal income taxes)
Free from the love of money (Deuteronomy 17:17)
He should not have a driving hunger for riches. Leaders cannot be men led by greed and lust for riches.
At this point the choice for Romney must of course vanish in a puff of logic. So anyway, I look forward to the Obama votes rolling in from such bible-guided fundamentalists...

Just kidding. And I'm sure they are, too.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site