Skip to main content

My favorite exchange during the final presidential debate came right after Mitt Romney dragged out his tired mantra about how the United States needs a stronger military and how, gosh darn it, the Navy actually has fewer ships than it did in 1916.

"Well, Governor,” replied the president, “We also have fewer horses and bayonets."

Zing! I loved it. I had been yelling something similar at the television screen every time I’d heard Romney pull out this inapt and deliberately misleading analogy on the campaign trail, and now with a television audience of millions, there was Mitt with egg on his face to go along with his painted-on smile.

President Obama had shown Romney up as both the neophyte he is when it comes to military spending and as a liar and manipulator delivering creaky old Republican talking points. Viewers of the debate had to be left unsure whether Romney knew what century this is.

Of course, the Republicans and other enemies of common sense were quick to spin Obama’s tart but spot-on comeback into something else entirely. GOP hacks and conservative commentators saw an opening, and have been working tirelessly to make sure shipbuilders in Virginia, a potentially critical swing state, are aware of the president's suggestion their industry is a thing of the past. Others railed about Obama’s perceived insult to the United States Navy. Not a few self-satisfied smart assess cracked wise about the notion that the Navy ever used horses in the first place.

Well, it was easily understood by the majority of debate watchers that President Obama wasn’t just talking about the Navy; he was talking about the nation’s military in toto. Obama's point was clearly that the nature of our military has changed, that we need to abandon the outdated Cold War mentality and get real about the nature of security and warfare in the 21st century. Raw numbers and random facts from the past are meaningless when making comparisons to today’s military and its capabilities. Instead of the obsolete strategies and equipment used to fight last century’s wars, we need to spend more wisely on things like cybersecurity and anti-terrorism technology. In other words, we no longer need so many horses and bayonets.

But let’s clear up something else while we’re at it. Before chortling Republicans make more jokes about seahorses they should be sure they know what they are talking about. Did the United States Navy ever use horses? You bet they did. Thousands of them.

Not far from where I live in New York the U.S. Navy stabled dozens of horses, employed at the Brooklyn Navy Yard for pulling wagons and lorries, loading and unloading ships, and general transportation, well into the 20th century. Now multiply those horses by the number of naval stations and shipyards around the globe, and you begin to get the idea. There was even a specialist rating of Dog and Horse Handler in the U.S. Navy until it was discontinued in 1951. The last working Navy horse, a World War II Army veteran named Dexter who was transferred to the Navy in 1945, hauled trash at the Philadelphia Naval Home for disabled and retired sailors. Dexter the horse, beloved mascot and therapeutic buddy to the old Navy veterans, was buried with full military honors upon his death at the age of 34 in 1968. Horse lovers and history buffs of all political persuasions may visit his grave in Dexter Park at Gray’s Ferry Landing in Philadelphia.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site