Skip to main content

       We have Romney who disingenuously said that spending Taxpayer money on FEMA is "immoral."

        I say that is disingenuous because Romney wants to actually take Taxpayer FEMA money and give it to states or "even better" give it to Private Sector.

        Therefore, the Taxpayer would have still paid the same amount of Taxes for a "FEMA" only Romney's pals in the Private Sector would get our money.

        Last night, Romney supporter, Rep Steve King (R-IA), during a debate said that he would not support FEMA money going to states unless there were strings attached.


As millions survey the damage from Hurricane Sandy, the Iowa congressman is already worried about what victims will do with the federal aid they haven't received yet. "I want them to get the resources that are necessary," he said Tuesday night during a debate.  "But they need to come with a plan on how to spend it, because [after Hurricane Katrina] they spent it on Gucci bags and massage parlors."
     King was one of only 11 members of Congress who opposed a 2005 bill to help those affected by Katrina. King's opponent, Christie Vilsack, called his comments "heartless."

      Now, let's talk about the Ryan Budget that cuts FEMA Funding.  

     The Center on Budget and Policy reported that Paul Ryan's Budget, which passed the House, that has "deep cuts" to disaster funding.

From Center on Budget and Policy
     The Ryan budget would cut non-defense “discretionary” (i.e. non-entitlement) funding by 22% in 2014 and later years, on top of the substantial cuts imposed by the BCA spending caps.  About 1/3 of this category of funding goes for grants to state and local governments to support services that states and localities provide, such as education, law enforcement, water treatment facilities, and disaster response.


      But the cuts to non-defense discretionary funding under the Ryan budget would be three times deeper in 2014 than the cuts from sequestration.  In later years, the difference would be even larger.

     Once again the Romney/Ryan lie-machine are playing with words and just because the words "disaster funding" was used in place of FEMA the Romney/Ryan liars are naturally, Romney/Ryan campaign are lying today saying that Ryan's Budget did not include cutting FEMA

From Washington Post

When asked whether FEMA would be spared from discretionary cuts under the House Republicans’ budget, Ryan’s campaign spokesman Brendan Buck pointed out that there were “no FEMA cuts in the House Budget.”
    The Post goes on to explain:
    The Ryan budget for 2013 would cut non-defense discretionary spending by 22 percent, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. About one-third of that discretionary spending goes to state and local governments to support activities that include disaster relief.
     Ryan’s 2013 budget doesn’t go into much detail about how the big domestic cuts would be distributed, so it doesn’t specify whether FEMA and its disaster fund would be spared. But if they are spared, then other programs in the non-defense discretionary category would have to be cut by more than 22 percent.

      Seriously, the current Republican party are nut-cases who belong in straight jackets and padded cells and far, far ... FAR ... away from writing our laws.
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site