I haven't posted anything for a while on KOS so forgive me if this has already been blogged.
I just read a news item that indicated that Admiral Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette was “fired” from his command of one of the three carrier battle groups [and recalled] back to Bremerton, Washington to face an investigation."
Admiral Gaouette has been removed from command of a carrier battle group operating near the Gulf of Hormuz, and sent home to Washington. Apparently none of the typical reasons that an Admiral would be recalled i.e. sexual misconduct, drug use, theft, crashing into another ship etc., apply. He was recalled for something else, inappropriate judgement. However, according to the article at the link, the Obama Administration in concert with the CIA and FBI broke up a planned mutiny by said Admiral and other officers. The story is at the link.
http://current.com/...
I will be the first to admit I'm not sure what happened and I'm not trying to lend any credence to a conspiracy theory. Still I can't disregard the article because it's hard to accept that something so unusual and potentially divisive would be done a week before the presidential election. And divisive it is. The comments on the MSM are truly amazing, accusing Obama of all kinds of treason, malfeasance and illegality. Such is the state of conservatism today. But what struck me was this:
"Their task, upon seizing power, is to facilitate a massive terror attack inside the United States, possibly using a stolen nuclear weapon, declare martial law, move troops into Iraq and to attack Iran with aid from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States."
"Facilitate a massive terror attack inside the United States" as an excuse to declare Marshall Law and start an illegal war? Does any of this sound eerily familiar? If true, these men would kill US citizens to further their own agendas. If true, men like these, or perhaps even these men, may have been involved on 9/11. It would explain a lot. Just some food for thought.