Skip to main content

Here are the latest figures out of Nevada.

We have some good news to report tonight, along with some data points from none other than Jim Messina.

For these reports, I will only be tracking Clark County and Washoe County.  Together, they account for just shy of 90% of all registered voters in Nevada.

First let's start with the numbers from Clark County:

Here are the cumulative early voting figures:

Dems 171,352 (48.15%)
Reps 116,994 (32.88%)
Inds 67,491 (18.97%)

TOTAL 355,837

Here are the additional early ballots cast since the last daily report:

Dems +13,079    
Reps +8,924
Inds +6,017

This has been a nice recovery from two days ago, when Republicans were behind Democrats only 1,618 in the early vote count on Monday.  Yesterday, we led Republicans by about 3,000 ballots.  And in this daily report, we lead by over 4,000.  This is extremely welcome and positive news.

Now, here are the cumulative figures, including mail-in ballots:

Dems 190,001 (47.67%)
Reps 134,394 (33.72%)
Inds 74,151 (18.61%)

TOTAL 398,546

As of this report, 46.79% of the 851,803 active voters in Clark County have voted.  2012 turnout among early voters is still running higher than in 2008.  

By the way, our registration advantage among active voters in Clark County is roughly 46% to 31% so the cumulative figures are close to those proportions thus far.  So far, the numbers look good in Clark County and we are regaining our mojo in early voting.  Btw, does anyone know how many early voting days are left in Nevada?

Now, let's take a look at Washoe County.

Here are the cumulative early voting numbers:

Dems 36,271 (41.31%)
Reps 35,441 (40.37%)
Inds 16,082 (18.32%)

TOTAL 87,794

Here are the new early votes since the last report:
Dems +2,841
Reps +3,128

Strangely, overall turnout is actually down from last week, on our side and on their side.  

Here are the cumulative figures, including mail-in ballots:

Dems 41,954
Reps 41,926
Inds 18,615

TOTAL 102,495

We cling to a tiny lead in a county where Republicans outnumber Democrats by just 1,200 active voters.

As of now, this constitutes 42.45% of the 241,459 active voters in Washoe County.  We are still in a solid position in Nevada thus far.

Here are the statewide numbers including all early and mail-in ballots:

Dems 235,514 (44.18%)
Reps 200,675 (37.65%)
Inds 96,872 (18.71%)

TOTAL 533,064

This constitues 42.39% of the 1,257,621 active voters in Nevada.  Among active registered voters, Democrats have an advantage of 7.2% over Republicans.  As we can see, among all actual early and absentee voters we only hold a 6.53% advantage over Republicans.  So on a statewide basis, Republicans have overperformed a bit in the early voting.  But the good news is that we will hold a solid lead going into election day.

According to Jim Messina's conference call from earlier today, two thirds of early voters in Nevada are women, young people, African Americans, or Latinos.  That is huge.  There are some Republicans in Nevada who are voting for Obama.  According to the last PPP poll which showed Obama ahead 51% to 47%, Obama bleeds only 8% of his base, but he gets 12% of Republicans.  According to the same poll, Obama is behind 53% to 44% among independents.  And the same poll shows us with a partisan edge of 42% to 36% in the crosstabs.  To me, this all seems very accurate.  

Obviously, Republicans are in far better shape than in 2008, when Democrats outnumbered Republicans about 48% to 35% in Washoe and 52% to 30% in Clark in the entirety of the early/mail-in voting period.  But they're just outnumbered in Nevada.  If we show up, we win.  And again, it was a very, very encouraging day as far as the numbers in Clark County go.  President Obama is going to win Clark County by ten points or more.  And if he does that, Romney doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning Nevada.

And now, I offer my projection of Nevada:

Here is how I think the electorate will look on election day:

                                         Obama                   The Stench
White (68%)                          41%                         57%
African American (9%)             93%                         5%
Latino/Hispanic (17%)              70%                         27%
Asian (3%)                             62%                        35%
Other (3%)                             64%                        34%

Which results in:                    51.93%                   45.87%

Perhaps this all seems way too optimistic.  I guess I just feel that all of the polling firms are underestimating Obama's strengh among Latinos.  I mean, in 2008, according to the exit poll, Obama got 76% of the Latino vote in Nevada.  My projection might even be a bit generous to The Stench here, I'm not sure.  I just don't see any possible pathway for The Stench to win Nevada, do you?

And by the way, another takeaway from Jim Messina's conference call was that The Stench's campaign increased its ad buy in North Carolina over the past two days.  Why?  If they felt they had North Carolina locked up they would NOT be doing this.  


What will be Obama's margin of victory in Nevada?

12%26 votes
58%119 votes
28%59 votes

| 204 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site