Skip to main content

So, how bad are things looking for Mitt Romney at this point? Well we all know about the polls and the labor numbers and the good press that President Obama has garnered from his appropriate handling of Super-Storm Sandy (sorry for the alliteration I didn’t name the storm) but you have got to really see the writing on the wall when the Washington Post Editorial Board post an article four days before election day under the title “Mitt Romney’s campaign insults voters”.

To quote Chris Farley in Tommy Boy,  that is gonna leave a mark!

But it doesn’t stop there, oh no, not by a long shot! Check this out:

How, other than an assumption that voters are too dim to remember what Mr. Romney has said across the years and months, to account for his breathtaking ideological shifts? He was a friend of immigrants, then a scourge of immigrants, then again a friend. He was a Kissingerian foreign policy realist, then a McCain-like hawk, then a purveyor of peace. He pioneered Obamacare, he detested Obamacare, then he found elements in it to cherish. Assault weapons were bad, then good. Abortion was okay, then bad. Climate change was an urgent problem; then, not so much. Hurricane cleanup was a job for the states, until it was once again a job for the feds.

Bing! Pow! Socko!

The Editors lay into Ol’ Mitt like that for his ads, for his refusal to disclose the names of his bundlers, and for failing to disclose his tax policy. They beat him like the rented mule of a red headed step-child.

But they really lay on the hickory switch when it comes to Mitt’s tax proposals:

And then there has been his chronic, baldly dishonest defense of mathematically impossible budget proposals. He promised to cut income tax rates without exploding the deficit or tilting the tax code toward the rich — but he refused to say how he could bring that off. When challenged, he cited “studies” that he maintained proved him right. But the studies were a mix of rhetoric, unrealistic growth projections and more serious economics that actually proved him wrong.
The Washington Post, being who they are, don’t let the President get away unscathed. As with their endorsement of Mr. Obama they are clear to say they are not thrilled with him but he is clearly the better of the two choices for the Editors:
But Mr. Obama has a record; voters know his priorities. His budget plan is inadequate, but it wouldn’t make things worse.

Mr. Romney, by contrast, seems to be betting that voters have no memories, poor arithmetic skills and a general inability to look behind the curtain. We hope the results Tuesday prove him wrong.

What makes this more interesting than just seeing a group of people I usually find to be pretty much to the right of me politically piss on the Republican Candidate form a great height is that the WaPo is not just a national paper, it is the major paper for a part of the country that includes one of the battle ground states that Mittens must win (assuming as it looks today that he will lose Ohio) in order to unseat President Obama.
While the Northern part of Virginia is more blue, there are a lot of Virginians in other parts of the state that do read the Post and will take this argument about the inherent dishonesty of the Romney campaign to heart.

In a closely contested swing state that has the possibility of making a big difference.

It might matter nationally too. The last few days has seen a big push by the Romney campaign to roll out the idea that Mitt will be all sweetness and light in working with Democrats, if only middle America will give him the chance.

Anyone reading this knows that this is the same BS that George W. Bush deployed to such great effect in his campaign and from Romney it is just as sincere are Bush was. Having a major paper call him out as a liar, a prevaricator and someone who clearly thinks the voters are nitwits may very well sway votes in other places.

After all he is the standard bearer for the whole Republican Party. If he is called out as a liar, what does that say to folks who are already souring on the likes of Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock?

I am feeling pretty good about this election, but things like this little nasty-gram from the WaPo Editors just make it that much better.

The floor is yours.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site