Skip to main content

In this editorial, which went up in the Noon hour this afternoon, the editorial board lambastes the Republican nominee.  It begins simply, and bluntly:  

THROUGH ALL THE flip-flops, there has been one consistency in the campaign of Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney: a contempt for the electorate.
The editorial board goes on to provide substantial substance to support that assertion:

-  his refusal to disclose essential information, such as his bundlers, his taxe

- his incessant flip-flops on positions, which they describe as "breathtaking ideological shifts," many of which are listed, such as

He was a friend of immigrants, then a scourge of immigrants, then again a friend. He was a Kissingerian foreign policy realist, then a McCain-like hawk, then a purveyor of peace. He pioneered Obamacare, he detested Obamacare, then he found elements in it to cherish. Assault weapons were bad, then good.
 

     (and that is not the complete list)

-  his misleading commercials

-   his unwillingness to flesh out his agenda in detail

But I have not yet gotten to where they really hammer him.  For that, please continue.

And then there has been his chronic, baldly dishonest defense of mathematically impossible budget proposals. He promised to cut income tax rates without exploding the deficit or tilting the tax code toward the rich — but he refused to say how he could bring that off. When challenged, he cited “studies” that he maintained proved him right. But the studies were a mix of rhetoric, unrealistic growth projections and more serious economics that actually proved him wrong.
Try that one more time, because it is succinct and oh so accurate:

     mathematically impossible budget proposals

The editorial goes through this in detail.   You can read that on your own.

The one weak moment in the editorial comes near the end, with the unfortunate tendency to frame a little bit in terms of "both sides do it" -  they criticize Obama for avoiding interviews, not offerings specifics for a 2nd term agenda, and distorting Romney's record in commercials.   To which I would say they are comparing the Mount Everest of what Romney has done to the rise of beach sand left when you turn over a child's bucket and leave a sand tower.

The concluding two paragraphs, which immediately follow, make up for that lapse.

Read:

But Mr. Obama has a record; voters know his priorities. His budget plan is inadequate, but it wouldn’t make things worse.

Mr. Romney, by contrast, seems to be betting that voters have no memories, poor arithmetic skills and a general inability to look behind the curtain. We hope the results Tuesday prove him wrong.

betting that voters have no memories, poor arithmetic skills and a general inability to look behind the curtain

We have seen that Romney will lose that bet - the lies about the auto bailout and the plans of GM and Chrysler were lies too much, for the media in Ohio, for the leadership of GM and Chrysler, and increasingly for voters as they realize that Romney has yet again been lying.

There are two preeminent newspapers in the United States.  The New York Times serves as the newspaper of record.  The Washington Post covers the federal government as its main focus.  While it is true that both editorially tilt liberally compared to the editorial boards of some other major newspapers (Wall Street Journal, anyone?), it is rare for these two major papers to be as blunt as both now have been about Mitt Romney and what he has said and done - and NOT said and done - in this campaign.

Read the editorial.

Pass it on.

And look forward to the American people proving Romney wrong on what he decided to offer - and hide - during this campaign.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site