Skip to main content

Many MMT posts and other writings on fiscal responsibility, including my own, focus on the myths of neoliberalism, pointing out why they are myths and developing an alternative MMT perspective in some detail. Off  hand, and I may have forgotten something, I couldn't think of a brief positive MMT narrative containing primarily the truths, rather than the myths. So, here's my version. Comments, criticisms, recasting in more effective form, are all welcome.

-- The US Government can't involuntarily run out of fiat money because it has the constitutional authority to create it without limit. Congress constrains and regulates this ability; but its existence is still a stubborn fact!

-- In addition to taxing and borrowing money and, most importantly, the Government has an unlimited capacity to create it. When it taxes and borrows, it removes it from the private sector. When it creates it, over and above what it taxes or borrows, it adds it to the private sector.

--The Treasury can keep borrowing money if we want it to. There's no limit on the Government credit card except the one imposed arbitrarily by Congress.

-- Bond markets don’t control US interest rates; the Federal Reserve Bank does by exercising its authority to meet its target interest rates. Bond vigilantes have no power against the Fed. If they fight against its interest rate targets; then they “die.”

-- The bond markets will most probably buy US debt for the foreseeable future; but if they don't, then the US won't be forced into insolvency; because the Government can always create the money needed to meet US obligations.

-- We're obligated to pay all US debts as they come due. Nevertheless, our national debt cannot be a burden for our grandchildren; since we have an unlimited credit card to incur new debt at interest rates of our choosing, or, alternatively can create all the money we need to pay off debt subject to the limit, without incurring any more debt; unless they wish to make it so by stupidly taxing more than they spend.

-- Since the US Government has no limits on its authority to create/spend money other than self-imposed ones, neither the level of the national debt, nor the debt-to-GDP ratio can affect the Government's capacity to spend Congressional Appropriations at all. That's why a fiscal policy that measures its success, not by its policy impacts, but by its success or failure in reducing deficits isn't fiscally responsible, or likely to be sustainable.

-- The Federal Government is not like a household! Households can’t make their own currency and require that people use that currency to pay taxes! So, their supply of dollars is always limited; while the Government's supply is a matter of its decisions alone.

-- Social Security has no solvency or “running out of money” problems. The SS crisis is a phoney one. So, no solution to this “fiscal crisis,” bipartisan or partisan is needed. What is needed is a solution to the political problem of getting SS's funding guaranteed in perpetuity  by Congress, just the way it guarantees funding for Medicare Parts B and D.

-- However large the Federal Debt becomes it cannot be a “crushing burden” on our Government, because federal spending is virtually costless to the Government, if it wants it to be.

-- Greece and Ireland are users of the Euro, not issuers of it. So, their supply is always limited and that's why they can run out of Euros. The US is the issuer of Dollars; so it's supply of dollars is limited only by its desire to create them, and that's why it can't become Greece, Ireland, or any other Eurozone nation.

-- Austerity cannot work in the United States economy because budget surpluses, defined as tax revenue exceeding spending, destroy net financial assets in the private sector. Unless, these financial assets are replaced through revenues acquired by running a trade surplus; the continuous loss in net financial assets by the private sector is unsustainable, eventually leading to credit bubbles, recession or depression, and the return of deficit spending. For a Government and economy like the US, with both a trade deficit and a substantial output gap, evidenced by high unemployment and under-employment, a policy of deficit reduction aiming toward budget surpluses (austerity) is destructive and will only push the economy further into recession or depression.

-- REAL Fiscal Responsibility is a pattern of fiscal policy intended to achieve public purposes, while also maintaining or increasing fiscal sustainability viewed as the extent to which patterns of Government spending do not undermine the capability of the Government to continue to spend to achieve its public purposes.

-- It is fiscally irresponsible to frame and follow a deficit reduction plan when both a trade deficit and an output gap exists, because by definition, such a plan is one that must remove net financial assets from the private sector every year the plan is pursued. Eventually, if pursued for long enough, declining financial assets will exacerbate the output gap by lowering aggregate demand and causing both labor and capital to deteriorate, thus reducing the productive capacity of the economy and the Government's ability to sustain productive deficit spending producing outputs of real social value.

So, current claims that we have a fiscal crisis, must debate the debt, must fix the debt, and must immediately embark on a long-term deficit reduction program to bring the debt-to-GDP ratio under control, all misconceive the fiscal situation because they are based on the idea that fiscal responsibility is about developing a plan to bring the debt-to-GDP ratio “under control,” when it is really about using Government spending to achieve outputs that fulfill “public purpose.” There is no fiscal crisis that will require “a Grand Bargain” and cuts to popular discretionary spending and entitlement programs. It is a phoney issue.

The only real crisis is a crisis of a failing economy and growing economic inequality in which only the needs of the few are served. MMT policies can help to bring an end to that crisis; but not if progressives, and others continue to believe in false ideas about fiscal sustainability and responsibility, and the similarity of their Government to a household. To begin to solve our problems, we need to reject the neoliberal narrative and embrace the MMT narrative about the meaning of fiscal responsibility. That will lead us to fiscal policies that achieve public purpose and away from policies that prolong economic stagnation and the ravages of austerity.

(Cross-posted from New Economic Perspectives.)

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  MMT will be the hope of the future. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    clonal antibody, Letsgetitdone

    Let's do whatever we can to bump this thread.

    I strenuously believe that if MMT had gripped OWS rather than New Keynesian, it would've been a much stronger force than it had been.

    Something like: TAXES DO NOT CREATE REVENUE IN A MONETARILY SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENT. Damn, if only the left realized this; we could get pretty much everything we want.

  •  Here's something succinct... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    clonal antibody, Letsgetitdone

    that arises from your austerity paragraph:

    It is mathematically IMPOSSIBLE for the USA to simultaneously run a government surplus, have a trade deficit and increase private sector wealth!

    Just another faggity fag socialist fuckstick homosinner!

    by Ian S on Mon Nov 05, 2012 at 09:11:40 AM PST

  •  stupid question from germany (0+ / 0-)

    what will happen if the USA looses its privilege of printing the worlds reserve currencey.
    You know those greenbacks that everybody around the world has to buy first before you can buy oil or a plane or any other big international traded items.

    -- The bond markets will most probably buy US debt for the foreseeable future; but if they don't, then the US won't be forced into insolvency; because the Government can always create the money needed to meet US obligations.
    because this will only work if the usa isolates it self from the world like japan did 2 centurys ago.
    yes your gov can print money like mad, so did simbabwe,
    but you can not tell the world community, we dont care if we spend your money and pay you back pennys on the lended dollars, not for long at least.
    •  First, being the reserve currency (0+ / 0-)

      isn't necessary to maintain a fiat currency system, as the existence of such a system in many other nations shows.

      Second, I've considered the issues of inflation and printing money here and here, and Scott Fullwiler has a very good discussion of coin seigniorage and inflation here. The Zimbabwe bogeyman is discussed here. And the Weimar bogeyman is discussed here.

      Bottom line. The dollar will not be deevalued by MMT policies, nor will the US isolate itself from other nations. However, if others no longer want to export to us more than they import from us because they don't like dollars anymore then that's perfectly alright. We'll just start making things here instead.

      And you can sell your stuff to other Eurozone states that are rapidly approaching depression, or to other nations willing to allow you to prop up the Euro artificially to facilitate German exports. Kapish?

  •  Excellent! nt (0+ / 0-)

    Might and Right are always fighting, in our youth it seems exciting. Right is always nearly winning, Might can hardly keep from grinning. -- Clarence Day

    by hestal on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 10:16:10 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site