Skip to main content

You keep nominating lunatics, what do you expect? You nominate people like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock up for Senate seats. You promise to launch a primary challenge on anyone who even whispers about the possibility that maybe someday on one or two issues, they may work with a Democrat and try to get something done for this nation.

Anyone who says that maybe the scientific method can actually tell us something about the world quickly becomes persona non grata in your party.

Your Senate candidates cost the GOP their chance to take control of the Senate. You had an opportunity to take both houses of Congress. You didn't, and it was your fault.
These candidates came from you. They are you. And they were awful.

You recently moved beyond the issue of abortion to questioning the morality of contraception. You did that. Rick Santorum won some states in the Republican primary and this was part of his platform. It's also part of yours with these personhood amendments.

Speaking of Rick Santorum: a political party with any semblance of sanity would have met his presidential bid with nothing more than laughter and derision. Instead, he actually won some primaries. Rick Santorum won some Republican primaries. Freaking Rick Santorum, guys.

Then there's the guy who you did nominate. Now, I know a lot of you were pretty upset that Mitt Romney got the nomination. Let's talk about that. No one better ran. Actually, I would argue that Jon Huntsman was significantly better than Romney was, but see the previous paragraphs for an explanation of why his candidacy was a non-starter. And this is the point: Why wouldn't anyone better run? Because of you, my Republican friends. You're nuts. People running for office have to get past you first so they have to say some of the craziest shit I've ever heard in my life. You demand it of them. A lot of people just won't do that. Mitt obviously had no problem with it, though, because he has no core.

So you were stuck with someone who has no core and you complained about it, but you caused it. The people you really like are straight-up unelectable and enough people in your party know that, so the party establishment squashes their candidacies. You complained about that, too, but come on, let's be honest: they saved you from yourselves. The people you did like didn't stand a freaking chance.

Demographics in this country are changing. Rabid hatefulness of anything that isn't Straight White Male and Christian isn't going to fly for long. Is rabid hatefulness too strong a description for you? How about prejudice? racist homophobic religiocentric masochism? General schmuckishness?

However you want to put it, your point of view isn't going to win the future. Your point of view is going to lose, by more and more as time goes on. Because it sucks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site