Skip to main content

It's a time honored tradition for pundits -- before the counting is even done, the question is asked -- "but is it a MANDATE?!"  Ah yes, the "mandate."  The notion that a presidential victory could be so decisive that even the minority party would acknowledge the wisdom of the American electorate and be forced to back the President's policies.

Remember how, in 2000, after losing the popular vote, President Bush moved to the center and worked with Congress on a centrist agenda after he acknowledged that he lacked a "mandate"?  Me neither.

Remember how, in 2008, after losing both houses (including a supermajority in the Senate) and the Presidency in a relative landslide the Republican minority decided not to obstruct the democratic agenda due to the "mandate"?  Me neither.

The fact is that a "mandate" is a concept that died in the 80's.  The pundits gotta get with the times.  President Obama doesn't have a mandate because mandates exist in the land of rotary dial phones and vacuum tube TVs.  They might as well exist in the land of unicorns and fairies.

But that doesn't stop the pundits.  They are all over the networks warning Obama not to lead as though he has a mandate.  Ask yourselves this -- if, God forbid, Romney had won the popular vote by over 3 million and colored a map red to include over 330 EVs, would the media be warning him not to govern as though he had a mandate?  Get serious.  It would be a "landslide," a "wave election," and most importantly a "mandate."  The media would be wrong, though.  Mandates don't exist anymore.  Victories sure do though.  Elections have consequences.  How sweet it is.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site