Skip to main content

Torah Reading:  Genesis:  Chapters 23 to 25:18
Haftarah:  First Kings Chapter 1: 1-31

This week's Torah reading opens with the death of Sarah.  Her husband Abraham rises from his mourning and goes to the Hittites, offering to purchase the cave of Machpelah from Ephron the Hittite:

Ask him to sell me the cave of Machpelah that he owns, the one at the end of his land. Ask him to sell it to me at its full price for a burial plot, with you as witnesses."  Ephron was part of the local Hittite community. Then Ephron the Hittite spoke up, answering Abraham with all the Hittites who were part of the town council listening:  "Oh no, my master! I couldn't do that. The field is yours - a gift. I'll give it and the cave to you. With my people as witnesses, I give it to you. Bury your deceased wife."  Abraham bowed respectfully before the assembled council and answered Ephron: "Please allow me - I want to pay the price of the land; take my money so that I can go ahead and bury my wife."  Then Ephron answered Abraham, "If you insist, master. What's four hundred silver shekels between us? Now go ahead and bury your wife."  Abraham accepted Ephron's offer and paid out the sum that Ephron had named before the town council of Hittites - four hundred silver shekels at the current exchange rate.
Genesis 23: 9-16.

Thus, our father Abraham declined Ephron's offer of a gift, and insisted on paying what was apparently the full market price of the land.  Why did Abraham decline the offer of  the gift?  One explanation is that Abraham understood that Ephron and his fellow Hittites were being kind to their neighbor who had just lost his wife, they truly felt sorry for him, so they offered to give him this land so he could bury his wife.  But Abraham did not want to take advantage of his neighbors, who might come to regret having giving away their land without a price.  Abraham insisted on being fair and just to them, by paying the full price of the land, and not to take advantage of their kindness.

We are obligated, not only by the laws of Torah, and not only by the laws of our cities, states and nations, to buy and sell with honesty and not to be deceitful in our economic dealings.  We may not like Wal-Mart, but we do not walk into Wal-Mart and attempt to shoplift, and all of us would agree that anyone who steals merchandise from any retailer, small or large, should be criminally prosecuted.  Four years ago our economy almost collapsed into a second great depression, triggered largely by crooks on Wall Street and investment bankers with their credit default swaps and hedge fund and other crooked dealing that enriched themselves while leaving millions of others impoverished.  And economic fairness also applies to the relationship between the so-called "job creators" and the vast majority who feed, house, and clothe their families from the wages they earn working for these "job creators."

Much of the Talmud is devoted to the regulation of the marketplace and of the workplace.  The rabbis developed a legal system to ensure that buyers and sellers, and employers and workers, do not use their economic muscle to impoverish the poor, and to ensure that we deal with one another fairly, honestly, and with dignity.  In Baba Metzia, Babylonian Talmud, 83a we read:

Some porters were hired to move a barrel of wine belonging to Rabbah bar [son of] Bar Huna, and they [negligently] broke the barrel.  Thereupon he [Rabbah bar Bar Huna] seized their garments; so they went and complained to Rav.  'Return them their garments,' he ordered.  'Is that the law?' he [Rabbah bar Bar Huna] inquired.  'Yes,' Rav rejoined, and quoted Proverbs 2:20 'Follow the way of the good.'  Rabbah returned their garments but still refused to pay them their wages.  The porters returned to Rav and told him:  'We are poor men, we have worked all day, and are in need: are we to get nothing?' Rav ordered Rabbah 'Go and pay them.'  'Is that the law?' Rabbah asked. 'Yes,' was his reply, quoting the second half of Proverbs 2:20 'and keep the path of the righteous.'
This Tuesday, a narrow majority of Americans (ignore the very artificial electoral vote) rejected a philosophy and political party determined to remove most of the regulations that regulate fairness in the market place, as well as most or all the laws that ensure that workers receive a fair and livable wage, a safe workplace, and are protected in their right to form unions to negotiate for decent working conditions.  Somehow, I think Rav and most of the rabbis, but not Rabbah bar Bar Huna, would have approved.

Shabbat Shalom  

Originally posted to Elders of Zion on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00 PM PST.

Also republished by Street Prophets .

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (13+ / 0-)

    "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

    by Navy Vet Terp on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:10 PM PST

  •  I really enjoyed that. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Navy Vet Terp

    Been so long since I stopped by for a bit of Talmud that I'd forgotten how fun it is to learn about it.

    All those centuries ago these people had figured out that some rules and regulations are necessary to keep the marketplace working fairly and smoothly to the benefit of all.

    And yet, today some people still have not got that figured out. "Free market! Free market!" That's gone a bit beyond the definition of "slow learners" hasn't it?

    “The right of the people peaceably to assemble, to consult for the common good, and to petition the government, or any department thereof, shall never be abridged.”

    by Marko the Werelynx on Fri Nov 09, 2012 at 12:24:18 AM PST

    •  The trouble with the free market (2+ / 0-)

      is that it's expensive!

      It's much easier to make money by throwing a game than by winning.  The whole economy collapsed because a few folks made it impossible for themselves to lose.  And now they want us to let them do it all over again.

      Nice drosh, NVT.

      Republicans want to make government small enough to fit in your vagina..

      by ramara on Sat Nov 10, 2012 at 05:45:25 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Or you can have a hissy fit (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        Like Robert Murray, CEO of Murray Energy Co., who had forced his employees to serve as a backdrop at a Romney rally without pay, or be fired, and now has laid off over 150 workers "and far more will come."  His letter said "we are forced to go into survival mode" as a result of the "redistribution, national weakness and reduced standard of living and lower and lower levels of personal freedom - the takers outvoted the producers."  Instead of kicking the walls in his mansion, this man is taking his political extremism out on the lives of workers, forcing hundreds and likely more into misery.

        When a CEO runs his company in such a way as to render his company harmful to the public interest, it's time for the state to step in with its powers of eminent domain.  The state can then resell the firm to the highest bidder, excluding Mr. Murray from the bidding.

        "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

        by Navy Vet Terp on Sun Nov 11, 2012 at 06:44:25 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  I know (0+ / 0-)

          I was appalled at that story.  The man seems to have an emotional age of around 5, and has no business being in a position of authority.

          But is it really a situation where eminent domain can come in?  The thought never crossed my mind.  (Of course I'm not a lawyer...)

          Republicans want to make government small enough to fit in your vagina..

          by ramara on Sun Nov 11, 2012 at 09:19:14 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  this is really superb (0+ / 0-)

    I am reminded of a story (off hand, don't remember the citation in Talmud, would have to look up)....about a wealthy man who had his servants lay silk carpets on the ground for him to walk on, and after he'd walked on them, he would let them keep him. For some reason, he lost his wealth, and as a result his daughter lost her dowry and had to go about the town picking barley seeds out of manure (which apparently had some value)....The moral of the story was that giving to the poor is like a preservative for one's wealth - you give tzedekah in part as a karmic insurance policy. Which is to say, that when it comes to money, there is a strong sense of social responsibility - you can be rich, you just can't be a jerk about it.

    •  grrr (0+ / 0-)

      Need to edit more carefully.

      I mean: After he walked on the carpets, he would let the servants keep the carpets.

      There are many stories in the Talmud that critique conspicuous consumption and indifference to the poor.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site