Skip to main content

Dear Conservatives: 

It was a tough night for you folks, I understand.  That bewildered and beaten sensation you are feeling right now is what many Liberals felt in November of 2004 when we thought for sure we were going to win and got the rug yanked out from under us.  We really thought that given the absolute clusterf*ckery of the current incumbent, there was no way, and I mean NO WAY that the American people would re-elect him.  And yet …

Now I in no way mean to compare the current President with his predecessor.  They are nothing alike.   That said it is impossible not to see some similarities in the election.   We had an incumbent who, though popular with his base was deeply distrusted by the other side and wasn’t fairing well with independents.  His opponent was not wildly popular with his party but was seen as being acceptable to independents and with a reasonable resume and gosh darn it, even if the guy does have the likability of a discarded shoe, he is generally inoffensive.  This should be a cake walk right?  

More below the commie squiggle. 

What I really want to do is dispel three basic arguments for you right now.   The first one of course would be that the evil Democrats and Obama’s Chi-town mafia mercilessly attacked Romney from the get-go with unfair accusations of him being a vulture capitalist, profoundly out of touch and a flip flopper of epic proportions.   Alright, that isn’t entirely untrue.   The problem with that argument is two-fold however.  Firstly, the accusations are not unfair and I know this because they have the benefit of being true.  I mean, you saw the guy right?  You saw him change his positions over and over again with cameras rolling.   You saw him say incredibly stupid things about trees being the right height, not knowing much about NASCAR but gosh he knows some NASCAR owners who are just swell and casually making ten thousand dollar bets on national TV right?   And that is just the tip of the iceberg.   Secondly, these were YOUR arguments.   Gingrich, Bachmann, Cain and Santorum all leveled these arguments at Romney during your primaries.  It was your guys saying it for Pete’s sake.  

The second argument is that Obama has presided over wrecking the economy and downgrading the US Credit Rating.   Okay this one is utter nonsense and you guys know it.  When he took office the economy was losing jobs at a rate of 800,000 per month.   It was going to take at least 6-12 months just to stop the bleeding never mind getting people back to work.  Once his policies actually got a chance to start working they did create jobs.  As a matter of fact if you take out the first 12 months of his Presidency, he created nearly 5 million of them and he did this in spite of the most obstructionist Congress I have ever seen.  As to the Credit downgrade, well folks that one is all on you.  It was Congress who picked that fight, apparently with the complete misunderstanding of what exactly a debt ceiling is.  You see, the debt ceiling is basically an agreement to pay back money we have already borrowed and spent.  It is not saying, “hey let’s go borrow this money later”.  It is sort of like losing a hand of poker and then saying you aren’t really sure if you should pay the amount you wagered.  People get testy when you do stuff like that.  

Argument three is that Romney went to the center and didn’t convey a true Conservative message.   Well I have some news for you.  Remember Murdock and Akins and West and the myriad of other “true conservatives” you guys bullied the party into nominating?  Well they all got beat pretty handily.  Now as a Liberal I would love to see you guys proudly fly the “true conservative” flag and double down in every election as you are basically putting yourself out of business as a national party.  And really that is the whole point.  I know Conservatives love to tell each other that America is really a nation of center-right wingers who get duped now and then by those evil Liberals but the truth of the matter is that this is a load of bull.   Most Americans like Social Security.  They like Medicare and Medicaid.  They feel sick when they watch people shout “let him die” during Republican debates about uninsured citizens.  They are appalled when you boo American service men and women because they are gay.  They are down right ashamed when you talk about making people walking down the street produce their “papers” because of the color of their skin or call women sluts and prostitutes because they want to know they can be insured for prescriptions.  They shake their heads in dismay when your candidate talks about borrowing money from their parents to start up businesses when they know themselves they don’t have that kind of money to loan their kids.  The truth is my Conservative friends that America is not a center-right country but a center-left country when actual policy is debated rationally and factually.  If you insist on ignoring this you will continue to lose by larger and larger margins. 

The reason you got thumped was that your message was not one that the American people agreed with and your nominee was one of the most duplicitous and unprincipled politician we have seen in recent memory.  They do not want more tax cuts for obscenely wealth Americans.   They don’t want to voucherize health care and social security.  They certainly don’t want the private sector to take over our children’s education and reduced regulation for Wall Street raiders who almost took our entire economy down with their greed.    They do not want to funnel hundreds of billions of dollars to defense contractors and more wars five thousand miles away.  Lastly they absolutely do not want government to invade their bedrooms, reproductive organs or privacy.  

America wants and needs vigorous discussion about the problems we face.  We need well reasoned and though out solutions that can only be achieved through the exchange of different ideas and co-operation.  The American people watched for four years as your party absolutely refused to budge on almost every issue we faced.  They watched as you publicly stated that your legislative agenda for the entire first term of the President was to ensure that he did not get a second one.  They saw you filibuster every attempt at meaningful change and you repudiate Health Care ideas that your own party espoused as a solution only a few years before and that your most recent nominee called a model for the nation to emulate when he put it in place in Massachusetts.  They watched you cravenly sacrifice the good of the citizens who elected you in order to make the President look bad.  

America watched as your nominee said one thing and then directly contradicted himself the next, then deny ever having had the opinion to begin with.   They watched him flip flop on everything from the nature of blind trusts, the need for transparency in government, reproductive rights, immigration, health care, the auto bailout, Bin Laden, Afghanistan, climate change, tax policy, Medicare, social security and too many other topics to mention and then you were aghast when the American people deemed him untrustworthy.  They watched him avoid giving any substantial details on any policy he offered and you were shocked when the American people deemed him secretive.  Lastly they watched him talk to a room full of doners when he didn’t think there were any cameras present and throw almost half of the country under the bus and you were amazed when they didn’t like what they saw.  

I am sorry Conservatives.  I do truly feel your pain.  Liberals had to do some serious soul searching following our 2004 loss and had to adjust to some harsh realities.  The reality we had to deal with was an opposition party that would say and do just about anything to win an election and that you had to back up a campaign with not just message but a certain amount of spine.  In other words, you taught Democrats that we had to learn how to throw an elbow.  Now it’s your turn to learn that being able to throw an elbow matters, but if you have a bad message when the other guy throws one right back at you, you can’t win national elections.  If you continue to ignore the realities of what the electorate wants simply because of the shrillest voices in your party, you will keep losing and there is no quick fix like simply adding a Hispanic to the next ticket.  You have allowed the lunatics to run the asylum.  You need to take it back.   

Sincerely,  The folks who just kicked your ass

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (17+ / 0-)

    There is a time to think and a time to act and this gentlemen, is no time to think! Bud Boomer

    by celtic pride on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 06:37:18 PM PST

  •  This is my first comment on Daily Kos.... (12+ / 0-)

    I've been reading here daily for 4 1/2 years, and am constantly in awe at what I read.  I'm very shy and never thought I'd post a comment (I hope I do it correctly)

    That said, what you wrote here, celtic pride, is perfect.

    I'm stealing it, if you don't mind, and sending it to my very dispondent family members.

    Thank you for putting into words what I couldn't.

  •  Actually, I don't think these "similarities" are (0+ / 0-)

    correct.

    That said it is impossible not to see some similarities in the election.   We had an incumbent who, though popular with his base was deeply distrusted by the other side and wasn’t fairing well with independents.  His opponent was not wildly popular with his party but was seen as being acceptable to independents and with a reasonable resume and gosh darn it, even if the guy does have the likability of a discarded shoe, he is generally inoffensive.  This should be a cake walk right?  
    Bush in 2004 had inherited a vibrant, healthy economy from Bill Clinton and ran it into the ground quickly.  The only reason he was re-elected was because people were hesitant to switch horses with 2 wars going on simultaneously.    Contrast to Obama, who inherited the worst economy of our lifetimes and had to clean up a huge mess.    Totally non-similar here.

    Also, most Americans, an overwhelming majority of Americans, blamed Bush and the GOP for the state of the economy, even to this day.  When the question of "blame" is polled, "Bush" is usually at 65%, OBama at worst at around 30%.  To this day.   So, I really don't see the equivalence here.   "Should be a cakewalk"?  Not in your wildest dreams, even with the best candidate the GOP could have brought forward.  That is indeed the reason none of the "big name" Republicans dared to run (Christie, Daniels, J. Bush, etc.), because they knew that even though we are in a difficult economy, their own party and their last party leader carried the brunt of the blame for it, making a run against Obama an uphill struggle from the very beginning.  

    Otherwise, good post, just can't let the false meme stand that anyone should have entertained the notion that this election would be a cakewalk for Romney or any Republican based on Obama "being popular with the base, but deeply distrusted by the other side and wasn't fairing well with Independents."    It is very hard to unseat a sitting President in any election year, but even harder when the one topic the other party has to go on is really a Trojan Horse, because the state of that topic (the economy) was blamed on that very same party trying to make the case (at least by a majority of Americans.)  

    Besides, Independents are not what they used to be, truly independent from the two parties but open to voting for either side based on issues.   Hidden within that demographic are now many tea-partiers who claim that their party has left them, has been too moderate, so the fact that a good chunk of Independents does not care for Obama is baked in because of the tea-party loons that make up a large part of the Independent realm.  

    •  It took awhile to notice (0+ / 0-)

      that the economy was so bad. It had never been easier to obtain a mortgage, and that created the illusion of prosperity. Meanwhile, the price of everything jumped 20% or more every year: health insurance, college, energy, housing...

      The rug was pulled out from under us when a highly leveraged economy built around complicated and rigged investments collapsed. Also:

      The only reason he was re-elected was because people were hesitant to switch horses with 2 wars going on simultaneously.  
      We were told point blank that voting against a sitting president during war time is treasonous. The same people who were cowered in 04 are now empowered Tea Party types.

      "A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself." - Joseph Pulitzer

      by CFAmick on Thu Nov 08, 2012 at 08:54:06 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  The proof for both yours and celtic prides (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      celtic pride

      excellent analysis is the almost total invisibilty of George W. Bush during the entire primary and final election process.
      None of the Rethugs could put enough daylight between themselves and good ol' W (and Cheney), their erstwhile 'heros and saviors'.
      A substantial majority of American voters are still aware of the taint of W and his party still lingering on.
      What is mindboggling is that almost the same (losing) percentage of Americans still voted against their own interests and apparently have learned nothing in the last decade.

      BTW: A most excellent dairy, I'm stealing it too!  ;]  (not that even it will do any good changing their sclerotic minds)

      "Double, double, toile and trouble; Fire burne, and Cauldron bubble... By the pricking of my Thumbes, Something wicked this way comes": Republicans Willkommen im Vierten Reich! Sie haben keine Bedeutung mehr.

      by Bluefin on Fri Nov 09, 2012 at 02:45:27 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site